What did you get right/ wrong?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hartijon
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2008
    • 1536

    What did you get right/ wrong?

    This season
    1.Got the Swans missing the finals right .I made the call after the Doggies disaster but amazingly they still could have made them well after this if they hadn't made some terrible turnovers and if the umpires had given us an even break.
    2. Got it right moving Jesse to the forwards and bringing in Pyke or Currie as our second ruckman.this worked fabulously well and I always thought we should be exploiting the luxury of extra height that we have.
    3. Got Grundy totally wrong! Wrote him off as a dud backman who should be in the forwards! WRONG!
    4. Got Hall wrong. Never thought he would brain fade so quickly or that the Club would drop him! Big surprise for me.
    5.Things which could still go either ways are

    Barlow..i don't think he has got it... could be wrong and hope I am.
    Moore..needed that stint in the 2's but still makes critical mistakes
    Pyke..I am calling "Its time" time he kicked a ball,marked and tackled.
    C. OBrien ..champion over worked and starting to brittle up
    Roos plan...it's changed or has it? why can the same sides always rip us apart?

    How did the rest of you call 2009 ? What mistakes or clangers did you make and what did you get right?
  • Hartijon
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2008
    • 1536

    #2
    I mean Craig Bolton not C. Obrien!!!

    Comment

    • Primmy
      Proud Tragic Swan
      • Apr 2008
      • 5970

      #3
      Originally posted by Hartijon
      I mean Craig Bolton not C. Obrien!!!
      LOL

      However, interchangeable.
      If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

      Comment

      • BSA5
        Senior Player
        • Feb 2008
        • 2522

        #4
        Got our position roughly right (between 8th and 13th, and with the way the season panned out, a win or loss either way would have almost taken us anywhere between those positions).

        Got Grundy wrong: I too thought he was being wasted in the backline. I did, however, rate him overall, which is more than a lot of people can say.

        I thought Bird would have another good but unremarkable year due to fitness issues (i.e. time on ground). Got that one right. I reckon, so long as his shoulder isn't too bad (does anybody have any details on that?), with another good preseason under him he should be right to start playing a bigger role in the guts.

        Thought Jack would be played in a more attacking role this year. Got that one wrong, but only sort of. He was freed up a bit, but not quite to the extent I was expecting.
        Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #5
          Right: Ablett needs DNA testing and the "ex"-junkie is still a tool.

          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • Plugger46
            Senior Player
            • Apr 2003
            • 3674

            #6
            Right:

            - Grundy. He's a player but I thought as a forward so I got the latter part wrong.

            Wrong:

            - Where we'd finish. Thought we'd be playing in an EF again.
            - Schmidt to cement his spot in the 22. Injuries meant that he didn't get the chance.
            Bloods

            "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

            Comment

            • Cardinal
              Regular in the Side
              • Sep 2008
              • 932

              #7
              Right - Cuz would have added some dynamism to our midfield

              Wrong - Swans would make the 8

              Comment

              • 2005
                : IN THE OUTER :
                • Dec 2007
                • 604

                #8
                Right : Said we would finish 13th, pretty close.
                Jesse White will become a star.
                Dan O Keefe wont play a game.
                Mike Pyke is a dud.
                LRT is a footballer.
                Nick Malceski will struggle to make any impact.



                Wrong : Heath Grundy : by a country mile.
                Ryan OKeefe : Fantastic season, now glad he stayed
                Rhyce Shaw : Still hate the look of him, though great year.
                John Longmire : Didnt think he would be the man.
                Est 1874
                SMFC
                09.18.33.2005

                Comment

                • Hartijon
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2008
                  • 1536

                  #9
                  Originally posted by AnnieH
                  Right: Ablett needs DNA testing and the "ex"-junkie is still a tool.

                  So cruel but unfortunately true!

                  Comment

                  • pinkemu
                    Silver member, not Gold
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 419

                    #10
                    Right - the new membership structure was a major stuff up (in Sydney).

                    Comment

                    • Armchair Coach
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 95

                      #11
                      Wrong-We'd be in the bottom 4. Hannebury wouldn't play senior Football.

                      Right-We wouldn't make the finals. This would be Hall's last year with Sydney.

                      Comment

                      • Primmy
                        Proud Tragic Swan
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 5970

                        #12
                        Right:
                        Barlow is a work in progress,
                        White would one day be a gun,
                        O'Keefe is not as bad as painted and would always do his utmost good.
                        Kirky has a lovely smile.
                        BBB's wiring was a worry
                        Membership and Marketing was getting it wrong, and something was going to collapse.
                        Tadhg would go home
                        We don't have enough legs.
                        Roos would consider retirement
                        We need a couple more indig on deck to provide unpredictability

                        Wrong:
                        MOD wouldn't get a game.
                        Smiffy may have to wait another year.
                        LRT was only just (sooo happy I was stuff all with that one)
                        Ves would run riot
                        Rhyce was unreliable
                        Pyke wouldn't get a game until 2011
                        Mal was a winner
                        MickyO couldn't kick over 40 metres.
                        If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                        Comment

                        • Plugger46
                          Senior Player
                          • Apr 2003
                          • 3674

                          #13
                          Originally posted by 2005
                          Dan O Keefe wont play a game.
                          Mike Pyke is a dud.
                          Nick Malceski will struggle to make any impact.
                          Highly debatable that all of these will be right long-term.
                          Bloods

                          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                          Comment

                          • RogueSwan
                            McVeigh for Brownlow
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 4602

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Primmy
                            We need a couple more indig on deck to provide unpredictability
                            I am sorry if I am being precious, but this statement doesn't sit well with me.
                            It is stereotyping a race.
                            You don't have to be 'indig' to be unpredictable, just remember our recently retired champ. Leapin'.
                            And being 'indig' doesn't mean you are unpredictable, see our no.37.
                            I am guessing that you mean we need a couple of quick guys with flair. That could be Jack, Veszpremi and even Monty if he gets fit again. Again these are not 'indig' players.
                            "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                            Comment

                            • Primmy
                              Proud Tragic Swan
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 5970

                              #15
                              I am talking about the unadulterated flair that Mick & Adam have, that Robbie, Troy, Derek had/have. That Liam, has in buckets. Most of the indig blokes have a degree of flair that cannot be taught. Its nothing to do with stereotyping - in the world of AFL its a fact. And I would love to see guys from Sydney and/or NSW being included in the Swans lineup. I am not saying Jack, Ves or Monty cannot be Adam or Mick, I am saying it would be great to see a bigger mix in our lineup.
                              If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                              Comment

                              Working...