The Battle for Granny Tickets

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnnieH
    RWOs Black Sheep
    • Aug 2006
    • 11332

    The Battle for Granny Tickets

    In a way ... I'm happy I don't have to go through the stress!!

    AFL fans battle for grand final tickets
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
  • j s
    Think positive!
    • Jan 2003
    • 3303

    #2
    Originally posted by AnnieH
    In a way ... I'm happy I don't have to go through the stress!!

    AFL fans battle for grand final tickets
    Des would like one - more specifically Jay would like one.

    Comment

    • Wardy
      The old Boiler!
      • Sep 2003
      • 6676

      #3
      My Geelong loving client got his 3 tickets that he went in the ballot for - he has been incredibly lucky to get them 3 years in a row. Yet there are many members that still missed out

      You would think now that something has got to give - we all know that the corporate dollar is king with the AFL and members of the actual competing clubs come a very poor last in the pecking order, but its time for the AFL to have a good hard look at things - to only allocate 25,000 to the clubs is appalling.

      Are they still stinging everyone with the $5 admin fee for registering - even though you may miss out altogether?
      I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
      Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
      AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        #4
        Originally posted by Wardy
        My Geelong loving client got his 3 tickets that he went in the ballot for - he has been incredibly lucky to get them 3 years in a row. Yet there are many members that still missed out

        You would think now that something has got to give - we all know that the corporate dollar is king with the AFL and members of the actual competing clubs come a very poor last in the pecking order, but its time for the AFL to have a good hard look at things - to only allocate 25,000 to the clubs is appalling.

        Are they still stinging everyone with the $5 admin fee for registering - even though you may miss out altogether?
        I think our system is fairest. Pay a premium to guarantee yourself a ticket if you want one.

        I'd die if we had a ballot for tickets.
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • Cher
          Born into the team
          • Feb 2003
          • 1474

          #5
          The sad thing is the people who have missed out three years in a row, where others have got tickets three years in a row.

          I can hear loudspeakers, I wonder what is going on over at K Park, I know that they had public training at about 11am. Ticket pick up was after 12 but its now 4pm.

          Helicopters annoy me but I guess I have to put up with them all week.
          CHER - Who has two types of blood cells "RED ones and WHITE ones"

          Comment

          • laughingnome
            Amateur Statsman
            • Jul 2006
            • 1624

            #6
            Originally posted by AnnieH
            I think our system is fairest. Pay a premium to guarantee yourself a ticket if you want one.

            I'd die if we had a ballot for tickets.
            It is fairer, but what happens when more then 12,500 members want a guaranteed seat? (25,000 between two clubs)
            10100111001 ;-)

            Comment

            • AnnieH
              RWOs Black Sheep
              • Aug 2006
              • 11332

              #7
              Originally posted by laughingnome
              It is fairer, but what happens when more then 12,500 members want a guaranteed seat? (25,000 between two clubs)
              This is where the smart club comes in ... they only sell 2,500 "guarantee" packages. The rest go to the little punters.
              Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
              Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

              Comment

              • Cher
                Born into the team
                • Feb 2003
                • 1474

                #8
                Geelong have a premium membership (Social club I think) where there is a guaranteed Grand Final ticket.
                According to Des's MIL there is a waiting list for that membership and another waiting list to get on the waiting list.
                No idea how many members there are who have this membership.
                CHER - Who has two types of blood cells "RED ones and WHITE ones"

                Comment

                • hot potato
                  Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 1122

                  #9
                  25,000 tickets for members of the competing teams is an absolute disgrace, the supporters help fund the game, we will always be grateful we got tickets in 1996, 2005 (especially grateful) and 2006. It's an awesome day.

                  HP
                  "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                  Comment

                  • goswannie14
                    Leadership Group
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 11166

                    #10
                    Heard on the radio the other day, think it was Coster from Geelong, that originally Waverley was planned to seat 147,000. Had that happened these problems would have been solved.
                    Does God believe in Atheists?

                    Comment

                    • AnnieH
                      RWOs Black Sheep
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 11332

                      #11
                      Originally posted by goswannie14
                      Heard on the radio the other day, think it was Coster from Geelong, that originally Waverley was planned to seat 147,000. Had that happened these problems would have been solved.
                      No they wouldn't have.
                      The AFL would find a way to give more tickets to corporates who have no interest in the game, team or results.
                      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                      Comment

                      • Norris Lurker
                        Almost Football Legend
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 2979

                        #12
                        Originally posted by goswannie14
                        Heard on the radio the other day, think it was Coster from Geelong, that originally Waverley was planned to seat 147,000. Had that happened these problems would have been solved.
                        That was the original plan.
                        A 147,000 stadium would give a capacity nearly double the MCG, which holds 76,000 plus MCC members (who are freeloaders, the AFL gets nothing for them and they may as well not be counted).
                        Unfortunately the MCC (the born-to-rule bunyip aristocracy), scuttled that and the chance is gone forever.

                        Follow me on Twitter - @tealfooty

                        Comment

                        • j s
                          Think positive!
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 3303

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Norris Lurker
                          That was the original plan.
                          A 147,000 stadium would give a capacity nearly double the MCG, which holds 76,000 plus MCC members (who are freeloaders, the AFL gets nothing for them and they may as well not be counted).
                          Unfortunately the MCC (the born-to-rule bunyip aristocracy), scuttled that and the chance is gone forever.
                          A 147,000 seat stadium would have been terrible - the bigger the stadium the worse the viewing - of necessity they get flatter and wider resulting in almost everyone being a lot further from the action. Compare Docklands with the MCG, Homebush (especially L6) with the SCG. Everone raves about the Gabba - a small stadium.

                          Comment

                          • Jewels
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 3258

                            #14
                            Originally posted by j s
                            A 147,000 seat stadium would have been terrible - the bigger the stadium the worse the viewing - of necessity they get flatter and wider resulting in almost everyone being a lot further from the action. Compare Docklands with the MCG, Homebush (especially L6) with the SCG. Everone raves about the Gabba - a small stadium.
                            I agree and disagree. In 05, we were three rows from the top in the Great Southern Stand, view was crap and the players were like ants. In 06, we were five rows from the front, view was fantastic. The thing is, the atmosphere and the thrill of actually being there was the same.
                            So whilst I agree with your point about the view, there is nothing on earth like being there and I would sit atop Sydney Tower if it meant "being there" and I think most fans, particularly the ones that have missed out on tickets, would agree.

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Jewels
                              I agree and disagree. In 05, we were three rows from the top in the Great Southern Stand, view was crap and the players were like ants. In 06, we were five rows from the front, view was fantastic.
                              That's subjective Jewels. When I was a teenager I loved sitting near the fence. Now I hate it, it's such a crap view of what is happening in the game. I was in the back row of the Southern Stand in 05. It was the best view in the ground IMO, because you could see what plays/players were available down field. I much prefer that view to seeing 36 players running behind/in front of each other from a seat near the fence.
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              Working...