NAB AFL Pre-Season/Rookie Drafts
Collapse
X
-
Not sure, at last reports Coney was still on the list and I have not seen anything to suggest de-listed him to remove the last year of his international rookie contract.
They would not be paying him so you would expect that they have retained him as the second international rookie in the hope he may want to come out in 2010 and give it another go.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Comment
-
I think rojo is referring to the new Irish recruit Chris McKaigue. A report in on an Irish site said he just left Ireland to commence pre-season training here.Comment
-
Wouldn't get too hung up on Port train-on list, though. Most players who train with them are never picked up; and conversely, they regularly rookie players (even SA boys) who weren't training with them!
Sadly, I have absolutely no idea whether NSW boys (or boys who lived in NSW for a while) who are no longer NSW residents, qualify for the local rookie rule. Because we (absolutely outrageously) picked up the delisted SA boy Smokey Davis under the local rookie rule a few years back, I suspect that origin doesn't matter (or help) and all that matters is that you're a current resident of NSW and have been here continuously for X period. We should definitely take Malcolm Lynch from under the noses of the Bulldogs, if I'm wrong and the rules are more liberal.
Presuming always that he misses in the PSD, I fear that Matthew Panos won't last past the first 5 GC selections; he's far more capable of walking in and being competitive at VFL league level from round 1, 2010, than most 18yo rookie prospects in the pool. If he does last past GC, I'm quietly confident that he'll make it to the Swans' first selection. If we want him.Comment
-
Not sure, at last reports Coney was still on the list and I have not seen anything to suggest de-listed him to remove the last year of his international rookie contract.
They would not be paying him so you would expect that they have retained him as the second international rookie in the hope he may want to come out in 2010 and give it another go.
DST
Incidentally, is that nominal list of 9 rookie slots that the AFL say we have available, really accurate? I believe that all other clubs are getting 2 extra rookie slots as a sop for the concessions to GC17, to take them up to a maximum combined list size of 46 (usually 44). See Brisbane, the only other club operating under the same rules as us, who have 40 players on their senior list but allowance for another 9 rookies (i.e. 46 plus 3 local rookies). Shouldn't we be allowed to have 11 on our rookie list next year, if we want to?Comment
-
Sadly, I have absolutely no idea whether NSW boys (or boys who lived in NSW for a while) who are no longer NSW residents, qualify for the local rookie rule. Because we (absolutely outrageously) picked up the delisted SA boy Smokey Davis under the local rookie rule a few years back, I suspect that origin doesn't matter (or help) and all that matters is that you're a current resident of NSW and have been here continuously for X period. We should definitely take Malcolm Lynch from under the noses of the Bulldogs, if I'm wrong and the rules are more liberal.
No idea whether that rule still exists in the same form - if so we could conceivably list the likes of DOK, Laidlaw and Brabazon that way if we wanted to.
But I don't think there has ever been any flexibility to use it for the likes of Lynch or Ryan Davis who have been on other club's lists and not residents of Sydney in the last few years.Comment
-
looks like Playfair is moving into Media / Marketing anyway ??
ie the Play Fair segments and no interest from other clubs no doubt !"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Thanks Ugg, that's the one. Good to hear he is on his way. Seemed like he had completely gone off the Swan's radar - maybe just because of the excitement surrounding the draft. Having a 'happy' Tadgh around should help him settle in.Comment
Comment