Mitchell watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16739

    Mitchell watch

    It's not too soon (or too optimistic) to be keeping an eye on the progress of Tom Mitchell, is it?

    Apparently he gathered 41 possessions and laid 8 tackles playing for the Claremont Colts at the weekend.
  • Rod_
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 1179

    #2
    Good news

    Seems he will be worth the father son selection

    Rod_

    Comment

    • Jeffers1984
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4564

      #3
      Does anyone know what kind of style midfielder Tom is? Is he one of those mega classy silky smooth gut running types like Cousins/Murphy?
      Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

      Comment

      • hammo
        Veterans List
        • Jul 2003
        • 5554

        #4
        It could be a long 18 months!
        "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

        Comment

        • Primmy
          Proud Tragic Swan
          • Apr 2008
          • 5970

          #5
          Ooohhh goody, Mitchell watch. No its not too soon Liz. Its going to be a few years before we can indulge in a Kelly watch (or a Roosy, or Luffy and I hear they are possibilities maybe, but oh boy can't wait for the O'Loughlin, Barry, and Kirky possibilities, no pressure of course) , so lets practice on Tom. Stats welcome.
          If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

          Comment

          • giant
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2005
            • 4731

            #6
            At least he's playing for the right team - the mighty Claremont Colts!

            Comment

            • Reggi
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2003
              • 2718

              #7
              Originally posted by Primmy
              or a Roosy, or Luffy a
              Roos played 98 games? Don't think his boys will be eligible for us, bizarelly
              You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

              Comment

              • laughingnome
                Amateur Statsman
                • Jul 2006
                • 1624

                #8
                Originally posted by Reggi
                Roos played 98 games? Don't think his boys will be eligible for us.
                Brisbane (Fitzroy) will obviously lay first claim to the next generation of Roos, but not all hope is lost. If Sydney thinks they have a case for it they can appeal for an exemption to the AFL on the grounds that a) Paul Roos played 98 games for us and b) has coached Sydney/South Melbourne in more games then anyone else (200 by season's end). But The Swans would have to fight for it, and there's no telling if it would be successful or not.
                10100111001 ;-)

                Comment

                • Triple B
                  Formerly 'BBB'
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 6999

                  #9
                  Originally posted by laughingnome
                  Brisbane (Fitzroy) will obviously lay first claim to the next generation of Roos, but not all hope is lost. If Sydney thinks they have a case for it they can appeal for an exemption to the AFL on the grounds that a) Paul Roos played 98 games for us and b) has coached Sydney/South Melbourne in more games then anyone else (200 by season's end). But The Swans would have to fight for it, and there's no telling if it would be successful or not.
                  Is there any precedent for that or are u just making it up?

                  I doubt other clubs would be happy and I wouldn't blame them one bit.

                  Of course it is all irrelevant unless they prove to be gun juniors.

                  I doubt they may have the hunger, after all, they've graced the winners dias on GF day already.
                  Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                  Comment

                  • ugg
                    Can you feel it?
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15963

                    #10
                    Roos played 87 games for us. Plugger might be the player you're thinking of on 98 games. A few notable names also just missed out

                    Schwass, Schneider 98
                    Nick Davis 97
                    Jason Ball 90
                    Capper 89
                    Schauble 88
                    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                    Reserves WIKI -
                    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                    Comment

                    • BSA5
                      Senior Player
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 2522

                      #11
                      We could get our hands on Roos' kids through the Academy anyway. Assuming it's anything like the NSW Scholarship scheme, it would trump, or at least be equal to, the Father/Son rule.
                      Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                      Comment

                      • hammo
                        Veterans List
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 5554

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BSA5
                        We could get our hands on Roos' kids through the Academy anyway. Assuming it's anything like the NSW Scholarship scheme, it would trump, or at least be equal to, the Father/Son rule.
                        This is correct. The scholarship scheme would also mean using a lower draft pick than may be required under f/s.
                        "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16739

                          #13
                          Originally posted by hammo
                          This is correct. The scholarship scheme would also mean using a lower draft pick than may be required under f/s.
                          Under existing scholarship scheme yes, but under the new academy, the same bidding process will apply as the FS rule.

                          Comment

                          • laughingnome
                            Amateur Statsman
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 1624

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Triple B
                            Is there any precedent for that or are u just making it up?

                            I doubt other clubs would be happy and I wouldn't blame them one bit.
                            Well, if you go back to the start of it all Barassi Junior was a Demon owing to a direct appeal to the VFL. Under the Zone he was Carlton's to pass up on. More recently this is a rare occuance but there is nothing to stop it happening. What grievance could, say, Geelong have to such an appeal? It does not affect their chances of recruiting the player and any precedent set would rarely be enacted given most coaches are of the age whereby their children are already in or past the system. If either of Roos' kids was a serious option I can't imagine why the Swans wouldn't explore every option available to them, and this is one. As others have mentioned the Acadamy is another.
                            10100111001 ;-)

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Triple B
                              I doubt they may have the hunger, after all, they've graced the winners dias on GF day already.
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              Working...