Official teams v Richmond

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    Official teams v Richmond

    SYDNEY SWANS v RICHMOND
    Sydney Swans
    B: Craig Bolton, Lewis Roberts-Thomson, Rhyce Shaw
    HB: Martin Mattner, Heath Grundy, Nick Malceski
    C: Jarrad McVeigh, Brett Kirk, Kieren Jack
    HF: Ryan O?Keefe, Adam Goodes, Josh Kennedy
    F: Jesse White, Daniel Bradshaw, Jarred Moore
    Foll: Shane Mumford, Jude Bolton, Ben McGlynn
    I/C: Lewis Jetta, Tadhg Kennelly, Dan Hannebery, Mark Seaby
    Emg: Nick Smith, Ted Richards, Paul Bevan

    No change

    Richmond
    B: Shane Edwards, Kelvin Moore, Chris Newman
    HB: Alex Rance, Luke McGuane, Dean Polo
    C: Dustin Martin, Brett Deledio, Trent Cotchin
    HF: Ben Cousins, Jack Riewoldt, Mitch Morton
    F: Ben Nason, Jayden Post, Richard Tambling
    Foll: Troy Simmonds, Daniel Jackson, Shane Tuck
    I/C: Ty Vickery, Daniel Connors, Matthew White, Relton Roberts
    Emg: Adam Thomson, Robin Nahas, Tom Hislop

    In: Cousins, Roberts, Tuck, Polo, Rance, White
    Out: Will Thursfield (leg), Mitch Farmer (leg), Tom Hislop, Jake King, Adam Thomson, Robin Nahas
    Last edited by Triple B; 8 April 2010, 05:41 PM.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    #2
    I like the words "no change".
    Does God believe in Atheists?

    Comment

    • dimelb
      pr. dim-melb; m not f
      • Jun 2003
      • 6889

      #3
      Good. No change necessary - yet.
      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

      Comment

      • Aaron
        Regular in the Side
        • Jan 2009
        • 805

        #4
        Well. NO change but interestingly, Seaby listed in the interchange while Mumford is in the starting 18.

        Comment

        • CJK
          Human
          • Apr 2006
          • 2170

          #5
          I'll play; No change
          -

          Comment

          • liz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16778

            #6
            Originally posted by Aaron
            Well. NO change but interestingly, Seaby listed in the interchange while Mumford is in the starting 18.
            Not sure it is overly interesting. Roos has pretty much said that the named players are pretty much randomly listed on the official team lists. I don't think there is ever much correlation between who is listed on the bench on a Thursday night with who actually starts on the bench.

            Comment

            • Mike_B
              Peyow Peyow
              • Jan 2003
              • 6267

              #7
              Originally posted by liz
              Not sure it is overly interesting. Roos has pretty much said that the named players are pretty much randomly listed on the official team lists. I don't think there is ever much correlation between who is listed on the bench on a Thursday night with who actually starts on the bench.
              Not at all. The only thing that means anything is if a 25 man squad is named, the emergencies will come from the 7 man interchange, so you can count on 18 of the players taking part in the game (barring late withdrawals) but whether they start on the ground or the bench come the bounce is only determined on game day.

              I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

              If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

              Comment

              • Bleed Red Blood
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2003
                • 2057

                #8
                Unchanged is pleasing.

                For the tiges, omitting King, Hislop and Thomson takes away almost all of their inside players (Tho they did bring in Tuck).
                Look at their centre line - Martin, Deledio, Cotchin. So talented. Such a waste.

                Comment

                • Jeffers1984
                  Veterans List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 4564

                  #9
                  Thursfield is a big out for them. Decent enough defender.
                  Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

                  Comment

                  • Nico
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 11339

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Aaron
                    Well. NO change but interestingly, Seaby listed in the interchange while Mumford is in the starting 18.
                    Seaby must be hanging on by the skin of his teeth after a lousy 135 Super Coach points. It's about time he showed some form.
                    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                    Comment

                    • teddys mum
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 130

                      #11
                      The inclusion of Cuzzy will lift the Tigers I reckon
                      up the guts

                      Comment

                      • Trickster
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 377

                        #12
                        Originally posted by teddys mum
                        The inclusion of Cuzzy will lift the Tigers I reckon
                        It will but not enough

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16778

                          #13
                          Originally posted by teddys mum
                          The inclusion of Cuzzy will lift the Tigers I reckon
                          He looked a long way from top fitness in round 1 and a week off is unlikely to have helped him much. At the height of his powers, his greatest strength was that he was still running all over the place when almost every other player had tired. He's not capable of that at the moment.

                          He's still a quality player but at the moment one to be respected rather than feared.

                          Comment

                          • hammo
                            Veterans List
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 5554

                            #14
                            Originally posted by teddys mum
                            The inclusion of Cuzzy will lift the Tigers I reckon
                            They are a terrible team. Anything less than a 1o goal win will be a disappointment.
                            "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                            Comment

                            • Yuri H
                              That One Over There
                              • Aug 2005
                              • 588

                              #15
                              Originally posted by teddys mum
                              The inclusion of Cuzzy will lift the Tigers I reckon
                              At this point Cousins is good tabloid gossip fodder, but on-field not that much a worry
                              (he said ... confidently)

                              Comment

                              Working...