He barlow, I mean, barely just played fair last week (and I don't mean the goodsport type fair). I think the selection committee live in the Bizzaro world from Superman comics where everything is opposite (cry when your happy etc..). I'm glad there isn't player called Badkick on the list, he'd get a gurnsey every week in Bizzaro world.
Playfair????
Collapse
X
-
-
Playfair's inclusion is nonetheless baffling particularly if we are putting up the white flag to Sandilands. If they throw him in ruck against him it is going to be very ugly for us. Likewise if he goes onto him when he moves forward. Uglier than Barlow! We have Bradshaw back,is Playfair to play White's role? I think so! If this is the case then we have better players ,in better form with Vez and MOD.If he is used as height in defence,Richards would have been better but he also probably has a niggle.I see the decision to play Playfair as one that might cost us dearly in a closely fought contest.Comment
-
Baffling is not the word- dreadful is the word for Playfair still being in the team. I thought last week he looked slow between the ears and on his legs, and he offered very little imo. Would have kept White in the team instead, and I am very worried about our tactic of just conceding the ruck for the sake of it."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Considering how long it is since he played, I thought he was fair. Given he was pretty effective with his disposals (80%), maybe taking his time to move the pill on was a sensible tactic last week. He's never going to rip the football world apart, but I think giving him another week to build some confidence is reasonable.Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.Comment
-
while we're on selections and Barlow was mentioned...I finally manged to get through the whole Geelong game (took over a week!) and the Barlow bashing is just over the top, unfair and frankly, inaccurate. He wasn't shizenausen actually....he wasn't very good, either....but he did do several good things (2 more contested markes than 16 other team mates put together, plus a nice goal). Completely underserving of the vitriol.
Look, he was in as the 22nd best player in the team...if 18 of the other 21 - from Superstars down - are dreadful then it's a bit bloody rich to pick on the 22nd guy and his 3 or 4 clangers. If someone was rating the players who had never seen a single Swan before, I am pretty sure that Barlow would not have rated bottom for the Swans on the day. Goodes and Smith were the only players in Red and White who broke even with their opponents. Barlow is probably done, but I, for one, am a bit sad about the circumstances....thrown in against Geelong with SEVEN first choice players out and the ones who are left playing like pathetic, scared butter fingered, headless chooks....and who gets to where the blame....Ed Barlow....not fair, not appropriate and very dissappointing from supporters of the "Bloods" culture. Vitriol sent at your players should be for Richmond fans and the like.
Remember when Barlow was the "Fridge"....'cos he was gonna be the White Goodes....wipes tear.
Fact is, neither were very good or added much to the team.Comment
-
barlow showed more once upon a time and is younger and would appear that he could develop into a player perhaps. Playfair is what he is, a hack who wouldnt get a game at richmondTheres not much left to sayComment
-
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
the completely unforgiving hatred towards playfair on here is really sad.
he comes back after 2 years and plays one game in an underperforming team, against one of the top 4 sides who have a very strong couple of defenders who didnt have bradshaw to man up on.... and you all think he should dropped for someone who is currently playing even worse? purely because you dislike the guy from 2 years ago.
sure if he plays rubbish in the next few games then i'll join your angry mob, but give the guy a break, he has put in a lot of effort behind the scenes with the younger swans and deserves a run, you know all the boys would be really happy that playfair is out on the field with them.Comment
-
the completely unforgiving hatred towards playfair on here is really sad.
he comes back after 2 years and plays one game in an underperforming team, against one of the top 4 sides who have a very strong couple of defenders who didnt have bradshaw to man up on.... and you all think he should dropped for someone who is currently playing even worse? purely because you dislike the guy from 2 years ago.
sure if he plays rubbish in the next few games then i'll join your angry mob, but give the guy a break, he has put in a lot of effort behind the scenes with the younger swans and deserves a run, you know all the boys would be really happy that playfair is out on the field with them.
your right he shouldne be personally attacked and hated. Just seems stupid he ever came on the list, then was allowed to stay showing nothing at all, but more talented people get the chop or miss selectionTheres not much left to sayComment
-
If you are going to use the internet better make yourself familar with this; Godwin's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-Comment
-
"As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment
Comment