Hannebery
Collapse
X
-
Bloods
"Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob SkiltonComment
-
Comment
-
He is a good kid, he has a fantastic pedigree (and don't say that doesn't count), he plays to win, he has a very well developed body, he is self assured, great powers of concentration, probably also puts the toilet seat down when appropriate, and he has already proven himself to be a leader (School Sports Captain). Its all there. However, WE THE PEOPLE, have to give it time to let all this talent shake down into its proper space. We are very fortunate to have some good kids coming through, whose journey we will enjoy. Don't think the PTB will let him burn out too early.If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhoodComment
-
Semantics I realize, but I don't really get why Lewis is a should and Josh is a could.
That said, t I agree with the overall sentiment; exciting times ahead indeed!I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Comment
-
Yes. I'm trying not to get carried away too soon (we know all the bad things that can happen to young footballers!) But he's terrific, most exciting prospect I've seen in years. I thought that sensational running goal yesterday was going to be one of those match turning-points; unfortunately, nobody else could get their skills together and close it out.Comment
-
You have to go to the base of the article, but Sheehan makes clear his view of the impending Rising Star winner . . .
Look out if Hawks actually find some form | Herald Sun'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Can someone educate me cos i'm a bit lost. When your rucks are completely dominating why do you need defensive midfielders. Surely you would have to be a good chance to get first use most of the time. Makes more sense than letting the opposition get it then trying to tackle them i think.Comment
-
That's a great one, why do we have defensive midfielders when our Ruckman are clearly winning the hit outs.Maybe we just need to bash the ball forward sometimes put them under immediate pressureCan someone educate me cos i'm a bit lost. When your rucks are completely dominating why do you need defensive midfielders. Surely you would have to be a good chance to get first use most of the time. Makes more sense than letting the opposition get it then trying to tackle them i think.Comment

Comment