Changes for Port Adelaide (Official teams named)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain
    Captain of the Side
    • Feb 2004
    • 3602

    #76
    There is a lot of Smith love, which is fine. However is he in our best 22 when everyone is fit? Maybe. He definitely deserves his spot right now and is playing well. However someone needs to be dropped for when Kennelly, Bradshaw, McGlynn, Moore, Seaby, Bolton etc etc come back.

    Playfair, Bevan and Pyke are obvious. After maybe Jetta, no one seems to be able to come up with the remaining 2.

    To me, Smith or Bird would be the next cabs off the rank.

    Unfortunate as I like them both. Good problem to have but.

    Comment

    • Peace
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2010
      • 598

      #77
      malceski and mattner will have to lift from their most recent form if they want to stay in the side for this 2nd half od the season... eski didnt have a great one last week.

      if mcglynn is fit and ready to go then bring him in for bevan or playfair.... he can hide amongst the grass down there in the vast open spaces! hopefully can kick another bag too!

      Comment

      • Hartijon
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2008
        • 1536

        #78
        Originally posted by Captain
        There is a lot of Smith love, which is fine. However is he in our best 22 when everyone is fit? Maybe. He definitely deserves his spot right now and is playing well. However someone needs to be dropped for when Kennelly, Bradshaw, McGlynn, Moore, Seaby, Bolton etc etc come back.

        Playfair, Bevan and Pyke are obvious. After maybe Jetta, no one seems to be able to come up with the remaining 2.

        To me, Smith or Bird would be the next cabs off the rank.

        Unfortunate as I like them both. Good problem to have but.

        Don't worry
        Someone will be injured!

        Comment

        • BSA5
          Senior Player
          • Feb 2008
          • 2522

          #79
          Originally posted by Captain
          There is a lot of Smith love, which is fine. However is he in our best 22 when everyone is fit? Maybe. He definitely deserves his spot right now and is playing well. However someone needs to be dropped for when Kennelly, Bradshaw, McGlynn, Moore, Seaby, Bolton etc etc come back.

          Playfair, Bevan and Pyke are obvious. After maybe Jetta, no one seems to be able to come up with the remaining 2.

          To me, Smith or Bird would be the next cabs off the rank.

          Unfortunate as I like them both. Good problem to have but.
          Of the current team, Smith and Bird would be selected before (in no particular order):

          Jetta
          Mattner
          Bevan
          Playfair (not like for like, but restructuring is always possible)
          Pyke (see above, but a little more murky)

          Our best 22 at full fitness is as such:

          B: Smith, LRT, C.Bolton
          HB: Kennelly, Grundy, Malceski
          C: Hannebery, Kirk, Jack
          HF: McGlynn, Goodes, O'Keefe
          F: Rohan, Bradshaw, White
          R: Mumford, McVeigh, J.Bolton
          I/C: Seaby, Shaw, Kennedy, Bird

          Emerg: Moore, Jetta, Mattner

          If I've missed anybody obvious, let me know. I really like Mattner as a player, I am by no means one of those jumping up and down demanding he be dropped every week, but we're developing as a side and his form of late hasn't been great. At full fitness, he probably just misses out. Smith is definitely ahead of him.
          Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

          Comment

          • Matty10
            Senior Player
            • Jun 2007
            • 1331

            #80
            Originally posted by BSA5
            B: Smith, LRT, C.Bolton
            Do you have Smith in the team ahead of Mattner as a defender, or as a shut-down / run-with player?

            Comment

            • ernie koala
              Senior Player
              • May 2007
              • 3251

              #81
              Originally posted by BSA5
              Of the current team, Smith and Bird would be selected before (in no particular order):

              Jetta
              Mattner
              Bevan
              Playfair (not like for like, but restructuring is always possible)
              Pyke (see above, but a little more murky)

              Our best 22 at full fitness is as such:

              B: Smith, LRT, C.Bolton
              HB: Kennelly, Grundy, Malceski
              C: Hannebery, Kirk, Jack
              HF: McGlynn, Goodes, O'Keefe
              F: Rohan, Bradshaw, White
              R: Mumford, McVeigh, J.Bolton
              I/C: Seaby, Shaw, Kennedy, Bird

              Emerg: Moore, Jetta, Mattner

              If I've missed anybody obvious, let me know. I really like Mattner as a player, I am by no means one of those jumping up and down demanding he be dropped every week, but we're developing as a side and his form of late hasn't been great. At full fitness, he probably just misses out. Smith is definitely ahead of him.
              I pretty much agree with your full strength squad. The player who would appear most vulnerable , on recent form, would be Kirk (though he would have to play many more poor games before being considered for dropping). That would mean Kennedy to the centre and any one of your emergencies on to the interchange bench.
              Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

              Comment

              • BSA5
                Senior Player
                • Feb 2008
                • 2522

                #82
                Originally posted by Matty10
                Do you have Smith in the team ahead of Mattner as a defender, or as a shut-down / run-with player?
                Either. Primarily in defence, but if the job needs to be done in the midfield, he can do that too.
                Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                Comment

                • Reggi
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 2718

                  #83
                  HAving re-watched the game

                  White played one of his better games. Playfair bloody hell, need one so drop Playfair

                  Bevan is next out. For mine get back Kennelly & Mcglynn especially on the larger ground
                  You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

                  Comment

                  • UglyDuckling
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 452

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Matty10
                    Do you have Smith in the team ahead of Mattner as a defender, or as a shut-down / run-with player?
                    i would have smith in the middle he has been excellent as a run with player, he shuts down better than jack, where jack hurts the opposition the other way by popping up for a goal.

                    bolton, lrt, grundy, shaw, mal and kennelly thats your back 6 maybe smith, rohan rotate through the backline to give the others a chop out.

                    Comment

                    • Reggi
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2718

                      #85


                      Kennelly must train to play, McGlynn to return
                      You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

                      Comment

                      • RogueSwan
                        McVeigh for Brownlow
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 4602

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Reggi
                        ..Kennelly must train to play, McGlynn to return
                        Give Irish another week off, we don't really need to rush him back. He wasn't playing to his high standard before the injury anyway. Don't risk the Tiger, save him for the Wobbles.

                        but more importantly -
                        Roos added that full-forward Daniel Bradshaw won't be considered this week, but he should be fit to return after the break.
                        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                        Comment

                        • Peace
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 598

                          #87
                          i agree, we dont need him for this game as long as malceski and mattner snap out of their recent poor form.

                          Comment

                          • undy
                            Fatal error: Allowed memo
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 1231

                            #88
                            I'm suprised no-one has suggested that Maxfield is dropped. He's been useful off the bench, but spent a LOT of time on the ground in the last 5 minutes of the game without getting a touch, generally occupying space (and organising the boys). I thought that the Swans may have been facing a please-explain from the AFL.
                            Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

                            Comment

                            • Primmy
                              Proud Tragic Swan
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 5970

                              #89
                              Originally posted by undy
                              I'm suprised no-one has suggested that Maxfield is dropped. He's been useful off the bench, but spent a LOT of time on the ground in the last 5 minutes of the game without getting a touch, generally occupying space (and organising the boys). I thought that the Swans may have been facing a please-explain from the AFL.
                              SSShhhhhh, don't mention the war!!!
                              If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                              Comment

                              • ugg
                                Can you feel it?
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 15963

                                #90
                                Originally posted by undy
                                I'm suprised no-one has suggested that Maxfield is dropped. He's been useful off the bench, but spent a LOT of time on the ground in the last 5 minutes of the game without getting a touch, generally occupying space (and organising the boys). I thought that the Swans may have been facing a please-explain from the AFL.
                                Dr Nathan Gibbs did a good job of manning the mark when LRT went down. He should get the credit for Hille missing his set shot.
                                Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                                Reserves WIKI -
                                Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                                Comment

                                Working...