Swans Confused by Tackling Rule
Collapse
X
-
-
The most annoying part in all this, is that the umpires not only change their interpretation from game to game but from quarter to quarter. Saturday night was a great example of what was legal in the first quarter, was a free kick by the third. Happens in every game to every team.
The rules and the confusing interpretations are a bloody joke! -
The current interpretation of the HTB rule is crap. We see far to many cases of a player taking possesion of the ball to be immediately wrapped up and driven into the ground by one or more opposition and being pinged for HTB without prior opportunity. Its rewarding the second to the ball players and needs an urgent redressing the the AFL.
I'm someone who can watch a game involving the Swans and be genuinely neutral about the merit of a free kick. We are as much recipients of the current poor interpretation as other clubs although in some games we get a bad run of decisions against.
The other rule hat is driving me crackers at present is the head high contact rule. Too many times a player is hitting his head into an oppositions leg when the opposition player is basically standing still and the diving player is the one initiating the contact but guess who gets the free? Whistle happy umpires ping the guy standing still - go figure!
I've just rewatched Saturday nights Poor Power game, we actually got a raw deal from the umps in this game. Not only a number of the dreaded HTB rules against us (more than they got) but not getting paid the blatant Daniel Motlop throw over his head, the blatant Danyle Pearce one handed throw plus a few others. No wonder the count was 30-16 in Poor Powers favour.Comment
-
And do you wanna know whats even more FRUSTRATING..the reactive AFL will change the rules again this weekend and we will see a complete new set of interpretations.
About time Gieshen get the sack, but Vlad loves his yes man..so no chance!Comment
-
Comment
-
I think dragging the ball in while the player is pinged in a tackle with no chance of disposal is a blight. One of my biggest bug bears.Comment
-
I still think Roosy should front the umpiring people and let them have it.
I've already offered to collect the fine money.
The umpires seriously @@@@ me.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
The most annoying part in all this, is that the umpires not only change their interpretation from game to game but from quarter to quarter. Saturday night was a great example of what was legal in the first quarter, was a free kick by the third. Happens in every game to every team.
The rules and the confusing interpretations are a bloody joke!Red & White forever.Comment
-
The most annoying part in all this, is that the umpires not only change their interpretation from game to game but from quarter to quarter. Saturday night was a great example of what was legal in the first quarter, was a free kick by the third. Happens in every game to every team.
The rules and the confusing interpretations are a bloody joke!
I'm not saying a one umpire solution is the way to go. One umpire is bad. Very bad. But at least he'll be consistant.10100111001 ;-)Comment
-
Consistency of application is only part of the issue in this instance. Do we actually want players to change their behaviour? Would that ultimately not just mean always trying to be second to the ball because if you get there marginally earlier than your opponent (or frequently, band of opponents) you are almost guaranteed to give up possession?Comment
-
Swans Confused by Tackling Rule
When I played and was an umpire for a time I was taught the one principle about our great game that should be timeless. The player who is going for the ball should be protected. We have the ridiculous situation now that players who secure possession being penalised for doing so.
The Jack free kick last game incensed me because he was the only player who wanted the ball, put his body on the line to get it and was then penalised. We've lost the plot as a game if players who are second to the ball get free kicks.
Watch the last 5 min of the Demons/Pies match. It was brilliantly umpired. They let the play go and let the players play footy. They could have pulled out technical frees all over the place but chose to let the play go. More power to them I say...And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SENComment
-
When I played and was an umpire for a time I was taught the one principle about our great game that should be timeless. The player who is going for the ball should be protected. We have the ridiculous situation now that players who secure possession being penalised for doing so.
The Jack free kick last game incensed me because he was the only player who wanted the ball, put his body on the line to get it and was then penalised. We've lost the plot as a game if players who are second to the ball get free kicks.
"Go for the ball, the umpire will protect you" is probably the most repeated phrase by junior coaches. Now a player gets the ball and the second man falls on his back and wins the free for holding the ball. Some players are making a mint out of looking as if they are going for the ball when their intention is to only draw the free for HTB.10100111001 ;-)Comment
-
Comment