Kennelly

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain
    Captain of the Side
    • Feb 2004
    • 3602

    Kennelly

    Can go back to Ireland.

    He adds stuff all and is taking up the spot of a kid.
  • CJK
    Human
    • Apr 2006
    • 2170

    #2
    Wow - would not have had $ on Irish getting the first angst thread following on from the loss.
    -

    Comment

    • Robbo
      On the Rookie List
      • May 2007
      • 2946

      #3
      I said this before the season began. We already had 3 rebounding defenders in Shaw, Mattner and Malceski. Adding another one who is 30 years of age to a side that needs to rebuild was just ludicrous.

      Comment

      • Captain
        Captain of the Side
        • Feb 2004
        • 3602

        #4
        Originally posted by CJK
        Wow - would not have had $ on Irish getting the first angst thread following on from the loss.
        Why? Because he isn't a regular whipping boy like Shaw, LRT etc?

        He is injury prone, a poor defender, has lost his attacking ability and gives away stupid free kicks at crucial times.
        Last edited by Captain; 4 July 2010, 05:01 PM.

        Comment

        • Melbourne_Blood
          Senior Player
          • May 2010
          • 3312

          #5
          His form at the start of the year was really impressive and a lot of people were suggesting he might be the recruit of the year. He's clearly not 100% right. But I;d still have him over Shaw. Pace or not, he is a S.P.U.D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • Melbournehammer
            Senior Player
            • May 2007
            • 1815

            #6
            Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
            His form at the start of the year was really impressive and a lot of people were suggesting he might be the recruit of the year. He's clearly not 100% right. But I;d still have him over Shaw. Pace or not, he is a S.P.U.D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            for fear of repeatng myself shaw is playing far better than tadgh at the moment who is getting beaten for pace and his decision making is poor.

            Comment

            • Melbourne_Blood
              Senior Player
              • May 2010
              • 3312

              #7
              far better? Hardly. They both were poor, but Kennelly is coming back from injury, maybe he shouldn't be playing. Shaw doesn't have an excuse

              Comment

              • Captain
                Captain of the Side
                • Feb 2004
                • 3602

                #8
                Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                far better? Hardly. They both were poor, but Kennelly is coming back from injury, maybe he shouldn't be playing. Shaw doesn't have an excuse
                At least Shaw gets the ball and makes things happen. Yes his 2 shots on goal were poor, but at least he was getting the pill.

                Comment

                • neilfws
                  Senior Player
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 1818

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Captain
                  At least Shaw gets the ball and makes things happen.
                  Things like opposition goals, mostly.

                  Comment

                  • gossipcom
                    Senior Player
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 2585

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                    far better? Hardly. They both were poor, but Kennelly is coming back from injury, maybe he shouldn't be playing. Shaw doesn't have an excuse
                    Not defending either player since both were below par this week, but just in regard to the above statement, Shaw's been injured too - but has been playing through his hip (or calf) injury.
                    Last edited by gossipcom; 4 July 2010, 10:01 PM.

                    Comment

                    • ScottH
                      It's Goodes to cheer!!
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 23665

                      #11
                      Originally posted by neilfws
                      Things like opposition goals, mostly.

                      Comment

                      • goswannie14
                        Leadership Group
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 11166

                        #12
                        Originally posted by neilfws
                        Things like opposition goals, mostly.
                        No, that was Kirk.
                        Does God believe in Atheists?

                        Comment

                        • Ken Oath
                          Warming the Bench
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 117

                          #13
                          I have always thought for years Kennelly was and is the worst defender for Sydney, if not the whole AFL. Don't rate him as a defender, or a person.

                          Why he seems to be protected year in year out I'll never understand. Yes he can kick, great, well done, he's had 10 years of practice. But's thats about it.

                          He wasn't raised with the game, so he's awareness/tackling/1%-ers are terrible. Definately NOT up to AFL standards. Seriously, if I were a forward playing Sydney and Kennelly came to mark me I'd be jumping with joy knowing he's as soft as child, can't hold on to a tackle, has got no intensity about him, and he's coach won't drag him no matter what. If Sydney get on top then yes I'll have to chase him but if our team get's on top, I'm basically a free man. The lad is not accountable in defence when the opposition has the ball. I mean, it's obvious.

                          And the best part is he's always the first to talk to the media about the 'teams' poor performances like he's god's gift to AFL and sport in general.

                          I always understood why most people liked him, because he attacked from the half back line and is a likeable character. That's all well and good when your part of a really good team whose consistantly winning, and the pressure is all on the other team. But fast forward a few years and when the shoe's on the other foot and it's time to defend under pressure he is by far the worst 'defender' in the game.
                          And let me say that if you play in the backline you are a defender first, then an attacker. After 10 years playing I'm sure all those pro-kennelly's out there can remember his darting runs up the field but can you remember the last time he made a half decent smashing tackle? No. All he can do is put on an angry face and slap with one hand like a girl.
                          Not he's own fault as he wasn't raised with those bread and butter skills, but shouldn't be automatically picked because he has an '05 medal.

                          And now for something that will prob upset a few out there.
                          I'm sick to the teeth of him bringing up his late father & his early homesickness in every interview. Yes it was a tough time, but it's now been years since. He's a grown man, it's time to grow a pair & stop looking for sympathy all the time and get on with it. He's not the only one who's migrated here and lost a parent.
                          He earns a fortune, had he's year's break and walzed straight back in to the starting line up out of experience only, bout time he did something. But wait, he can't, because he's a defender who can not defend properly!!

                          If Kennelly's deserves his regular spot on talent, then LRT is an all-Aulstralian.

                          Comment

                          • dimelb
                            pr. dim-melb; m not f
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 6889

                            #14
                            Originally posted by goswannie14
                            No, that was Kirk.
                            Yesterday it was both, unfortunately.
                            But I'm not happy with Tadhg atm. We picked him for his run, carry and deliver, and he's not doing any of those well. Perhaps time in the twos to get his touch back? But he is slower than he used to be. And like one of our other 'runners' Malceski, he never was an outstanding defender. We are really missing B2, both for his own defence and for his generalship.
                            He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                            Comment

                            • Captain
                              Captain of the Side
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 3602

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Ken Oath
                              I have always thought for years Kennelly was and is the worst defender for Sydney, if not the whole AFL. Don't rate him as a defender, or a person.
                              Yep a totally rubbish defender. Just doesn't have the ability to spoil or position his body correctly which is probably a result of not knowing the game. What's worst is that he isn't even providing attack from the HB line like he used to.

                              I can't comment on him as a person, though his book sounded like he was a knob.

                              Comment

                              Working...