Bevo Contesting MRP charges

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CJK
    Human
    • Apr 2006
    • 2170

    Bevo Contesting MRP charges

    According to the AFL and SEN Twitter.

    Good on the club
    -
  • AnnieH
    RWOs Black Sheep
    • Aug 2006
    • 11332

    #2
    What charges???
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

    Comment

    • CJK
      Human
      • Apr 2006
      • 2170

      #3
      Originally posted by AnnieH
      What charges???
      R21, AFL 2010 Swans V Bulldogs: Gameday & Autopsy

      2nd post
      -

      Comment

      • Plugger46
        Senior Player
        • Apr 2003
        • 3674

        #4
        Given what Josh Hunt got over the weekend (and Mummy earlier in the year), I thought Bevo was pretty lucky.
        Last edited by Plugger46; 24 August 2010, 12:09 PM.
        Bloods

        "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          #5
          The bastards.

          Bevo's finally come good!!!
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • laughingnome
            Amateur Statsman
            • Jul 2006
            • 1624

            #6
            Originally posted by Plugger46
            Given what Josh Hunt over the weekend (and Mummy earlier in the year), I thought Bevo was pretty lucky.
            As I said in another thread, Hunt's was a spear tackle. Mummy's was what they call a "sling" (and a soft-as one at that). I haven't seen footgae of Bevo's one and must have missed it on the night.
            Last edited by laughingnome; 24 August 2010, 12:06 PM.
            10100111001 ;-)

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16773

              #7
              Originally posted by Plugger46
              Given what Josh Hunt got over the weekend (and Mummy earlier in the year), I thought Bevo was pretty lucky.
              How so?

              All the other tackles that have deemed to be reportable offences have had the "high" classification. Although the contact to the player from the offender wasn't high, the fact that the tackle resulted in the tacklee's head hitting the ground is deemed to create high contact. Whether or not one agrees with this (and whether or not one wonders why this appears to matter for some tackles but not others), Bevan's tackle wasn't deemed to be high contact so presumably Griffen's head didn't hit the ground.

              So Bevan appears to be the first player charged where, by the MRP's own assessment, the tackle was low impact and body contact and yet is against the rules. Given that tackling is not against the rules, Griffen should have expected contact as he was in possession, and there was no head high contact, it is very hard to understand what offence Bevan has supposedly committed that players don't commit every time they lay a tackle.

              Comment

              • CJK
                Human
                • Apr 2006
                • 2170

                #8
                Originally posted by liz
                it is very hard to understand what offence Bevan has supposedly committed that players don't commit every time they lay a tackle.
                The audacity to play for the Sydney Swans?
                -

                Comment

                • Plugger46
                  Senior Player
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 3674

                  #9
                  Originally posted by liz
                  How so?

                  All the other tackles that have deemed to be reportable offences have had the "high" classification. Although the contact to the player from the offender wasn't high, the fact that the tackle resulted in the tacklee's head hitting the ground is deemed to create high contact. Whether or not one agrees with this (and whether or not one wonders why this appears to matter for some tackles but not others), Bevan's tackle wasn't deemed to be high contact so presumably Griffen's head didn't hit the ground.

                  So Bevan appears to be the first player charged where, by the MRP's own assessment, the tackle was low impact and body contact and yet is against the rules. Given that tackling is not against the rules, Griffen should have expected contact as he was in possession, and there was no head high contact, it is very hard to understand what offence Bevan has supposedly committed that players don't commit every time they lay a tackle.
                  Looked just as bad to me but I suspect the club have a better idea than I do.

                  Maybe I need to look at it again but it looked like Griffen's head hit the ground to me.
                  Bloods

                  "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16773

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Plugger46
                    Looked just as bad to me but I suspect the club have a better idea than I do.

                    Maybe I need to look at it again but it looked like Griffen's head hit the ground to me.
                    But the MRP's own assessment says it didn't.

                    Comment

                    • Kirkari
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1036

                      #11
                      What a bad joke they are at the MRP. Absolutely bloody hopeless. Fingers crossed on a good outcome but I'm not holding my breath.
                      Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

                      Comment

                      • msb
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Mar 2006
                        • 827

                        #12
                        Why bother? He can take a reprimand and still play this week.

                        Comment

                        • dimelb
                          pr. dim-melb; m not f
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 6889

                          #13
                          Originally posted by msb
                          Why bother? He can take a reprimand and still play this week.
                          Precedent.
                          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                          Comment

                          • ugg
                            Can you feel it?
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15970

                            #14
                            He can still play even if he doesn't beat the charge because of his 5 year good record earning him a 25% discount.
                            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                            Reserves WIKI -
                            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                            Comment

                            • GoSouth33
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 695

                              #15
                              I do remember him making a tackle which slid down the legs and he gave away a free. I commented about his rugby league background being to blame. Surely, this wasn't the incident????
                              Run2Live,Live2Run

                              Comment

                              Working...