First huge test for new coach! 2nd ruckman or no?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Go Swannies
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2003
    • 5697

    #31
    Originally posted by Will Sangster
    It's pretty clear that you don't like Seaby and nothing will change that. Pyke improved remakably in 2010, but he needs to improve by the same margin again before he is on par with Seaby.

    I will be interested to see how we use the 3 ruckmen next season
    I do like Seaby. And he was playing well before he was injured. But so was Crouch, in an earlier age. I'm just making the point that things may have moved a lot in the past six months.

    But we do agree that it'll be interesting to see how the Swans fit all of the talls in the team. Maybe Myke will be given the task of learning a new position each year?

    Comment

    • royboy42
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2006
      • 2078

      #32
      At the time of his injury I thought Seaby was playing at least as well as Mumford. All things fitnesswise being equal in March, I would expect Seaby to be an automatic selection behind Mumford. How the club handles Pyke is up to them..thats why they're there and we're here.\, but he is a VERY handy third string or potential KPP.

      Comment

      Working...