2010 Rate the Season: #5 Ryan O'Keefe

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bloody Hell
    Senior Player
    • Oct 2006
    • 3085

    #16
    Originally posted by AnnieH
    A while ago, in this place, if you put up a poll "ROK is hot" was always an option.
    Wait till Goodesy's turn!!
    Indeed. Dare say I contributed to my fair share.

    Wouldn't -

    10 - ROK is hot

    Make more sense.
    The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

    Comment

    • laughingnome
      Amateur Statsman
      • Jul 2006
      • 1624

      #17
      Originally posted by Bloody Hell
      Wouldn't -
      10 - ROK is hot
      Make more sense.
      Naw, in my book "10 - Can do no wrong" implies he is hot AND awesome on the field. "1 - ROK is Hot" implies that his season was horrible but he's still a spunk. Either way, ROK is hot.
      10100111001 ;-)

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        #18
        Originally posted by laughingnome
        Naw, in my book "10 - Can do no wrong" implies he is hot AND awesome on the field. "1 - ROK is Hot" implies that his season was horrible but he's still a spunk. Either way, ROK is hot.
        Right on brother!!
        Hilarious.
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • 707
          Veterans List
          • Aug 2009
          • 6204

          #19
          6 - great start but faded under weight of nagging injury? Please get well for 2011, a game breaker when fit

          Comment

          • Velour&Ruffles
            Regular in the Side
            • Jun 2006
            • 897

            #20
            Originally posted by RogueSwan
            5 - Whilst not mightily pissed off it has annoyed me. In hindsight it was a selfish and un-BLood like. Even un-Pebbles like. Would his ommission and Bevo's inclusion in the SF have made 6 points of difference? Who knows? It probably would have.

            Now just s'pose ....
            We would have then played the Aints with Bradshaw having his kicking straightened up. A tight win then a GF against the Pies, a game we would have had a great chance of winning because the Pies would have been over confident and caught unawares by the Bloods. Bevo would have kicked two telling goals in the final quarter and the Swans would have been 2010 premiers.
            But of course this didn't happen because Pebbles was playing injured.
            One of the best laughs I've had for ages. Our record against the Pies is so damn good I expect we would have flogged them by several hundred points.
            My opinion is objective truth in its purest form

            Comment

            Working...