Welcome Jed Lamb, Luke Parker, Alex Johnson, Matthew Spangher

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sirius_black
    On the Rookie List
    • Nov 2010
    • 10

    #61
    Originally posted by ugg
    More on Lamb

    Article from June, talking about his transition to a forward (involves a Butcher!) This Lamb's not so sheepish
    From the co-inkydink files.... Have a look at who Jed is evading in the accompanying photo for that article - Alex Johnson!!

    Taken from the curtain-raiser for the Hawks v Bloods at the 'G, if i recall.
    Bring Back Jamie Lawson.

    Comment

    • Dalai Lama
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Nov 2008
      • 632

      #62
      "spring" Lamb and "nosey" Parker?

      Comment

      • sprite
        Regular in the Side
        • Jan 2003
        • 813

        #63
        Originally posted by DST
        We have a list of 40 players + rookies.

        In that list we require forwards, backs, utilities, midfielders, young, old, developing, mature.

        In 2011 some will be first choice, some will be groomed to be first choice and others will be back-up.

        If the club feels that over the entire list of 40 plus players that it has enough developing KP talls and wants some futher insurance cover for this year and the next, then so what.

        It's remarkable that we can spend so much time on her bitching about such a minor decision, when we have just drafted another 3 young kids to the 4 we drafted last year who will have the final say on where our club will be in 3 years time than Spangher ever will.

        For the record, out of the smalll amount of mature aged players in the country capable of playing some decent back-up football in a KP defender role he was about the best around.

        DST
        Ah once the voice of reason comes to the fore.

        What do folks want a list of 18 - 20 year old that is constantly turned over.. in search of the elusive star
        sprite

        Comment

        • aardvark
          Veterans List
          • Mar 2010
          • 5685

          #64
          Spangher is our "Premiership Barometer" If we have to play him we won't win the Premiership.

          Comment

          • Big Al
            Veterans List
            • Feb 2005
            • 7007

            #65
            Originally posted by aardvark
            Spangher is our "Premiership Barometer" If we have to play him we won't win the Premiership.
            Not necessarily my friend. We did win a premiership with Bevo in the side. Case closed
            ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

            Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

            Comment

            • aardvark
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2010
              • 5685

              #66
              Originally posted by Big Al
              Not necessarily my friend. We did win a premiership with Bevo in the side. Case closed
              Ha.... If we win a premiership with Spangher playing I will personally deliver a slab of your choice to your front door........so long as you share

              Comment

              • Xie Shan
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2003
                • 2929

                #67
                Originally posted by aardvark
                Spangher is our "Premiership Barometer" If we have to play him we won't win the Premiership.
                John Worsfold disagrees

                ?You would expect O?Loughlin to have a little bit more footy smarts over Spangher and a little bit more strength, but I know who?s more likely to play in an AFL premiership right at this point.?
                He is certainly more likely to play in a premiership now given the state the Eagles' list is in these days!!

                And yes that was the match Hall knocked out Staker.

                Comment

                • cookie
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 50

                  #68
                  Longmire talks about the selection of Spangher and how it will help our depth and how our defenders are not getting any younger

                  Last edited by cookie; 20 November 2010, 06:17 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Peace
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 598

                    #69
                    this forum will be having plenty of spanga banga's in 2011 if he under-performs.

                    Comment

                    • Primmy
                      Proud Tragic Swan
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 5970

                      #70
                      Originally posted by cookie
                      The way some people are going on you would think pick 73 would get us an absolute gun. Most players around this range dont ever play a senior game, and the ones that do make it often need time to develop and are better off to be rookie selections. So given we wanted a ready made player - Spangher is a a very good selection at 73.
                      Ahm Back! Carked Computer!.

                      quite frankly I think Spangher at 73 is a pretty good deal. We got a grown up, and at the same time he is only 23, but a grownup in footy terms.. We got a big unit who is game fit. We got a guy who wants to come to Sydney and has already acknowledged this is the club that can help a bloke get the best out of himself. We got someone who has an ex teammate here who can be useful as an encouraging mentor. We also got someone I had rather thought in the past had a bit of "something", and for the life of me I cannot tell you why....just one of those things. And I like his face.

                      I mean, 73! Could be a bargain buy. Especially at this stage of player selection
                      Last edited by Primmy; 20 November 2010, 08:42 PM.
                      If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                      Comment

                      • Bleed Red Blood
                        Senior Player
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 2057

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Peace
                        this forum will be having plenty of spanga banga's in 2011 if he under-performs.
                        Only if he gets games undeservedly. LRT, Grundy and Bolton will be picked if they're fit to play. Spangher, Reid, Everitt could all play key roles in defense if one of the former group goes down with an injury (or bad form rut for that matter) so the best performed of those in our reserves games should be in to the team. That's always going to be subjective and people will no doubt say oh man that guys clumsy or have no sympathy if he gets caught holding the ball cause everyone could clearly see he was about to get caught and he was just so damn slow. same things we're said of lrt. just like any other new draftee, he could never play a game for us. but he fits a criteria we need right now. also i think this means the end of richards in the eeniors. I think he should go to gws, he still he has a lot to offer a footy club.

                        Comment

                        • sharp9
                          Senior Player
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2508

                          #72
                          So...just to prove how right I was with my "West Coast is toxic under Worsfold" comment.....notice that the article is headlined 'I have faith in players" in which he specifically references 3 players who he de-listed within 2 years (Spangher, McKinley and MacNamara). I always thought he was complete pooh as a coach...never gotten over his pig-headedness at not putting a spare man back even with a minute to go in the 2006 QF...what a dunce. Perfect case of winning a Cup "in spite" of the coach. A tough/cheaty bastard as a player...first one picked (gulp - except for the '94 GF :-) ) but has no feel for people (IMHO!!!!!) just the same as a similar player in Voss. Only difference is Voss was not gifted as good a midfield as you will ever see.
                          "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11348

                            #73
                            Originally posted by sharp9
                            So...just to prove how right I was with my "West Coast is toxic under Worsfold" comment.....notice that the article is headlined 'I have faith in players" in which he specifically references 3 players who he de-listed within 2 years (Spangher, McKinley and MacNamara). I always thought he was complete pooh as a coach...never gotten over his pig-headedness at not putting a spare man back even with a minute to go in the 2006 QF...what a dunce. Perfect case of winning a Cup "in spite" of the coach. A tough/cheaty bastard as a player...first one picked (gulp - except for the '94 GF :-) ) but has no feel for people (IMHO!!!!!) just the same as a similar player in Voss. Only difference is Voss was not gifted as good a midfield as you will ever see.
                            The Ben Cousins story says it all. Drug taking was rife in 2005/2006 and the heirachy had to know what was going on. Uhhhmm, cough, cough....isn't Worsfold a chemist? I am happy to see the cheats languish at the bottom forever.
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Jewels
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3258

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Peace
                              this forum will be having plenty of spanga banga's in 2011 if he under-performs.
                              Why? He was our final selection after two years of what looks like wonderful drafting of some great young talent, he was taken to add depth and depth only. No-one on here has claimed he's going to be a champion or win a Brownlow or two, there hasn't even been the "future leader of the club" tag put on him.
                              The two articles explaining the reasons for Spanghers selection, looks to me like the drafting/coaching panel felt there was some explanation needed.
                              If he under performs, it's no biggy really.

                              Comment

                              • Peace
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Mar 2010
                                • 598

                                #75
                                i wont be grilling him, i always take the positive view

                                Comment

                                Working...