I'm not a particular fan of the 9 point goals, though they are inoffensive enough in the NAB Cup, I suppose. But if we're going to have them, I really like the change they've made this year. It used to be that if you got a 50m penalty, and scored directly from it, you would get 9 points even if you kicked it from the goal square. At least now they are making players actually earn the extra 3 points by insisting that they have to kick them from outside 50m. And I like the fact that players get a choice too.
There are stll too many being given, though, and I fear this might carry over into the season proper. The one against Jude was clearly a 50m penalty (and a bit of a brain fade from Jude). And the one to Malceski was fair enough too, though maybe tough on the offending player (also J Bolton I think!) as he was already committed in the air and couldn't have done much to avoid the contact. But the one against JPK, while technically there, was tough, no idea what the one to Krakouer was for, and we got a couple of very soft ones too - the not giving the ball back on the full is a rubbish reason to give a 50m penalty unless it is obvious the offending player is trying to waste time. Jude got one courtesy of this particular rule.
There are stll too many being given, though, and I fear this might carry over into the season proper. The one against Jude was clearly a 50m penalty (and a bit of a brain fade from Jude). And the one to Malceski was fair enough too, though maybe tough on the offending player (also J Bolton I think!) as he was already committed in the air and couldn't have done much to avoid the contact. But the one against JPK, while technically there, was tough, no idea what the one to Krakouer was for, and we got a couple of very soft ones too - the not giving the ball back on the full is a rubbish reason to give a 50m penalty unless it is obvious the offending player is trying to waste time. Jude got one courtesy of this particular rule.

Comment