Worst win we've had for a long time.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • giant
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2005
    • 4731

    #31
    Yes, Scott, yes it was.

    I've lived thru some awful crap with the Swans but that makes three games in a row where I haven't managed to keep watching till the end - and we won two of those games! Playing with no confidence, no system and only occasional moments of ticker. Need something or someone to turn this on its head or it all ends in tears.

    Comment

    • barry
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 8499

      #32
      Horse has a lot to answer for. We recruit a forward (Johnson) as an early draft pick. We play him in defense in the reserves for a few years. Then when he gets a game he's played forward.

      Perfect way to confuse a young player. Ordinary coaching. Blind freddy could tell you the positions open in the seniors this year are forward. Why wasnt Johnson played up forward in the 2's for all of 2011?

      Comment

      • swansrule100
        The quarterback
        • May 2004
        • 4538

        #33
        Originally posted by goswannie14
        I stand by my belief that they will merge with the GC within 5 years.
        would gold coast want to merge with that rabble?
        Theres not much left to say

        Comment

        • Plugger46
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2003
          • 3674

          #34
          Don't knock winning games - that's as relieved as I've been since the EF last year. We'll get some players back and we'll get better. I don't think we've played particularly well all year and we're 6th, a game and % out of the top 4
          Bloods

          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

          Comment

          • dimelb
            pr. dim-melb; m not f
            • Jun 2003
            • 6889

            #35
            Originally posted by barry
            Horse has a lot to answer for. We recruit a forward (Johnston) as an early draft pick. We play him in defense in the reserves for a few years. Then when he gets a game he's played forward.

            Perfect way to confuse a young player. Ordinary coaching. Blind freddy could tell you the positions open in the seniors this year are forward. Why wasn't Johnston played up forward in the 2's for all of 2011?
            I suspect because he already knows how to do that, as we saw on Saturday. I also suspect it's about versatility. No more one-trick ponies.
            He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

            Comment

            • Primmy
              Proud Tragic Swan
              • Apr 2008
              • 5970

              #36
              Originally posted by Big Al
              I never know whether a Swans match is any good until I see the replay. Too focused on the result to worry about the aesthetics of the game.
              +1
              If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

              Comment

              • laughingnome
                Amateur Statsman
                • Jul 2006
                • 1624

                #37
                Originally posted by goswannie14
                I stand by my belief that they will merge with the GC within 5 years.
                And I stand with you in that belief, save for the 5 years. The media deal assures 9 games a round, so for North to merge/fold within 5 years would require another team to be invited into the league. But no suprises if it happens in time for the next deal.


                Originally posted by swansrule100
                would gold coast want to merge with that rabble?
                It worked for Brisbane when they merged their up-and-coming list with the few Fitzroy players that were still there that could (or would) cut it. Plus the F/S bonuses.
                10100111001 ;-)

                Comment

                • Primmy
                  Proud Tragic Swan
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 5970

                  #38
                  Originally posted by barry
                  Horse has a lot to answer for. We recruit a forward (Johnson) as an early draft pick. We play him in defense in the reserves for a few years. Then when he gets a game he's played forward.

                  Perfect way to confuse a young player. Ordinary coaching. Blind freddy could tell you the positions open in the seniors this year are forward. Why wasnt Johnson played up forward in the 2's for all of 2011?
                  they all have to earn their strip. Its not a given. And the kid was really only playing his first year of the game at a higher level, and the best way to learn about how to be a defensive forward is to learn how to play down back. He could already take a safe mark. He could already kick a straight ball. He had a lot to learn about everything else. And he played hot and cold all last year which generally means an above the shoulders issue. You have ressie players who are itching to play anywhere anytime, learn and learn, like Sam Reid and Hanners, and then you have some others. I have no issue with the way his talent/game has been handled. Mature bodies does not automatically mean a mature attitude.
                  If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                  Comment

                  • GoSouth33
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 695

                    #39
                    Doubt that a merger could happen....The Suns have received all their draft concessions and will develop into a very competitive unit without North players. I think a merger might test the loyalty of current Suns members who are accepting them with current colours and logo. North turned their backs on the GC a while back perhaps they will head to Hobart where they're hoping to play a couple of games a year in a deal currently being explored.
                    Run2Live,Live2Run

                    Comment

                    • Melbournehammer
                      Senior Player
                      • May 2007
                      • 1815

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Primmy
                      they all have to earn their strip. Its not a given. And the kid was really only playing his first year of the game at a higher level, and the best way to learn about how to be a defensive forward is to learn how to play down back. He could already take a safe mark. He could already kick a straight ball. He had a lot to learn about everything else. And he played hot and cold all last year which generally means an above the shoulders issue. You have ressie players who are itching to play anywhere anytime, learn and learn, like Sam Reid and Hanners, and then you have some others. I have no issue with the way his talent/game has been handled. Mature bodies does not automatically mean a mature attitude.
                      I also think hes got a long way to go to become a regular. He gets outbodied really easily at the moment and is not quite quick enough to create enough space on a lead between him and the defender.

                      Playing him in defence may well be one of the ways to teach him how to outbody bigger players who may be slower at the NEAFL level than at AFL.

                      he reminds me a little of jason heatley circa 1997 - if you can get the ball in his hands he'll kick you a goal but you need to get it into his hands

                      Comment

                      • Nich
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2010
                        • 1291

                        #41
                        He'll need to work on his pace as well. It will all improve as his body gets stronger and more mature though. Facts are he turned 20 2 months ago. We have to remind ourselves sometimes, well I do anyway!

                        Comment

                        • ShockOfHair
                          One Man Out
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 3668

                          #42
                          Sure, we were rubbish, but North were a complete flop, the umpires were fabulously unpredictable and North fans are spewing. Lots of positives.
                          The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                          Comment

                          • Hartijon
                            On the Rookie List
                            • May 2008
                            • 1536

                            #43
                            To me the win showed we are one of the best teams around at defending a lead.Heroic defense again down to the wire.Well done backline and followers

                            It also showed we lack any potency in attack. We can't kick a decent lead. Our lack of forward structure was partly addressed with LJ at FF as raw as he is. Persist with this and with Reid at CHF and by this time next year we will have a potent forward line. Add TDL to the pocket and we are in business.If we don't settle the forward structure down expect to get slaughtered by any top 4 team and some othere too.Thank God for Mc Glynne!

                            It showed we have some good players who give their best regardless of the score.It showed LRT is not a ruckman or forward. It showed Goodes is having problems above the shoulders with his play.It showed North are rubbish.

                            It showed that if you choose the right sub,it can win you the game

                            Comment

                            • BSA5
                              Senior Player
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 2522

                              #44
                              There have been a lot of "very bad wins" this year. To be honest, I think this is a good thing. A number of times, we've found a way to win when it didn't seem possible. This can't be understated. 2005 followed a similar pattern, getting back into games when we really shouldn't have. We lost that ability in 07-09, and in fact it turned into the opposite: we couldn't win a close game no matter how we hard we tried. In 2010 we won a couple. But in 2011, suddenly, we've found a way to save games, to not get run down, to protect our lead, or stage a come back, and at least scrape a draw.

                              To me, this is the sign of a good team. Not necessarily a good team right at this second, but a team that will be good sooner rather than later.
                              Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                              Comment

                              • goswannie14
                                Leadership Group
                                • Sep 2005
                                • 11166

                                #45
                                Originally posted by laughingnome
                                And I stand with you in that belief, save for the 5 years. The media deal assures 9 games a round, so for North to merge/fold within 5 years would require another team to be invited into the league. But no suprises if it happens in time for the next deal.
                                That could be Tassie, or the other option is North relocates to there. Either way, I can't see them survivng as North melbourne..
                                Does God believe in Atheists?

                                Comment

                                Working...