We have the 3rd lowest 'Points For' in the league

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • No 14
    On the Rookie List
    • Sep 2006
    • 262

    We have the 3rd lowest 'Points For' in the league

    OK... we know we have a great defence... 5th best record for points against in the league (after 9 games) but...

    We are 14th for 'Points For'... just beat Adelaide (4 points), a few more ahead of Port (on average) and more than the Suns.

    If we are to make the top 4 we need to score more goals... if we were to play Geelong's strategy and leave someone in the goal square (who could mark) who would you recommend? Or is there an alternative strategy?
    _______________
    May the earth devour the West Coast Evils
  • ugg
    Can you feel it?
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 15961

    #2
    We had the 3rd lowest 'Points For' at the end of the 2005 regular season. And that's despite having a quality forward line in Hall, O'Loughlin, Davis, O'Keefe and Schneider.

    It's a good omen if you ask me
    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
    Reserves WIKI -
    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

    Comment

    • dimelb
      pr. dim-melb; m not f
      • Jun 2003
      • 6889

      #3
      Originally posted by No 14
      OK... we know we have a great defence... 5th best record for points against in the league (after 9 games) but...

      We are 14th for 'Points For'... just beat Adelaide (4 points), a few more ahead of Port (on average) and more than the Suns.

      If we are to make the top 4 we need to score more goals... if we were to play Geelong's strategy and leave someone in the goal square (who could mark) who would you recommend? Or is there an alternative strategy?
      When he is available, Pyke. Alternating with Mummy of course. Johnston and Reid could also rotate through that position as an alternative to sitting on the bench.
      Also it's worth noting that until the blowout against Hawthorn, we had the equal third lowest points against.
      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

      Comment

      • ShockOfHair
        One Man Out
        • Dec 2007
        • 3668

        #4
        Our percentage is a bit soft, though. We're 7th best on 100% a long way behind 6th (Essendon on 119%) and just ahead of Freo, Melbourne and Saints.

        The stat just reinforces what we know: the forward line is our weak spot.
        The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

        Comment

        • Peace
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2010
          • 598

          #5
          most of those teams have played goldcoast.... and thrashed em

          Comment

          • Donners
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2003
            • 1061

            #6
            Bah, GC will probably be up and running by the time we get them...

            Comment

            • Peace
              On the Rookie List
              • Mar 2010
              • 598

              #7
              yep..... we only get to play them once and its still another month away

              Comment

              • Cheer Squad
                Sydney Swans
                • Apr 2007
                • 1948

                #8
                Originally posted by Peace
                most of those teams have played goldcoast.... and thrashed em
                Originally posted by Donners
                Bah, GC will probably be up and running by the time we get them...
                Originally posted by Peace
                yep..... we only get to play them once and its still another month away
                Here's an opinion on our chances against the Suns in today's Herald...

                There's a long way to go, but history backs Swans action in September

                I don't know on what grounds Mr. Wu thinks we'll be "overwhelming" favourites to beat GC. They knocked us over unexpectedly at BOP earlier this year.

                Comment

                • DST
                  The voice of reason!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 2705

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Cheer Squad
                  Here's an opinion on our chances against the Suns in today's Herald...

                  There's a long way to go, but history backs Swans action in September

                  I don't know on what grounds Mr. Wu thinks we'll be "overwhelming" favourites to beat GC. They knocked us over unexpectedly at BOP earlier this year.
                  That was a planned loss, to avoid a trip to Perth the week after.

                  The bonus was we ended up staying in the comp anyway.

                  DST
                  "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                  Comment

                  • lwoggardner
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 141

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Cheer Squad
                    Here's an opinion on our chances against the Suns in today's Herald...

                    There's a long way to go, but history backs Swans action in September

                    I don't know on what grounds Mr. Wu thinks we'll be "overwhelming" favourites to beat GC. They knocked us over unexpectedly at BOP earlier this year.
                    Article ignores the fact that this season is 24 rounds, with byes all over the shop so any comparison to the ladder in round 10 of previous seasons is a bit of a stretch. That said, the one thing that might indicate the top 8 is set is this bit....

                    That gap is greater than it appears as ninth-placed Richmond have played one more game than Sydney.

                    Comment

                    • Nico
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 11328

                      #11
                      It appears to me our midfielders have gone missing from the forward 50.
                      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Nico
                        It appears to me our midfielders have gone missing from the forward 50.
                        This has been a trend for quite a while now. Whilst other clubs seem to be having a crack from the 50m line or further, we still insist on trying to spot up a player, and missing, or putting into the pockets for the impossible goal.

                        Comment

                        • stellation
                          scott names the planets
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 9718

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nico
                          It appears to me our midfielders have gone missing from the forward 50.
                          I may also add to that, it appears to me our midfielders are missing going into the forward 50 too. I would not enjoy playing as a forward to our midfield at the moment.
                          I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                          We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                          Comment

                          Working...