Sydney's Big Spend on Gun Forward

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bas
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4457

    Sydney's Big Spend on Gun Forward



    Article in today's paper which sounds like journo crap to me.

    Even if we had $1 million to spend, there isn't anyone in the market to fill this void. You can forget Fev.

    Rather I think the Swans will continue with what we have and Reid will become the CHF and we will either have LJ or Jesse at FF or they will rotate through the position. Benny has been playing FF alot for most of the games that I've been to.

    It's an easy story to write on the back of Plugger and Hall though.

    I would take Franklin though. Not that he's going anywhere.

    Edit: Damn realised at the final second the Gun turned out to be Gin. We'll do with a Scotch, Whisky or Vodka forward as well!!
    In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16733

    #2
    Even if there was a gin forward available and wanting to come to Sydney, our first round pick this year is almost certainly not available for trading (Tom Mitchell).

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #3
      Well the titile got my curiosity going. Thought we'd found someone at Liquor land!!

      You're right though the power forward no longer exists.
      About the closest their is as a youngster, who may be available one day, is young Jack Reiwoldt.

      Comment

      • swansrule100
        The quarterback
        • May 2004
        • 4538

        #4
        either riewoldt would do, nick might like a change, but cant see him ever leaving stkilda, plus hes older i guess.

        could try and poach a future star like Hurley or Darling, or walker maybe???

        we will probably end up offering hally a four year deal.
        Theres not much left to say

        Comment

        • Jeffers1984
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 4564

          #5
          In Jesse we trust. Leave him at FF and have Pyke/Seaby relieving Mummy.
          Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

          Comment

          • Cheer Squad
            Sydney Swans
            • Apr 2007
            • 1948

            #6
            Originally posted by Bas
            http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/af...-1226068259827

            Even if we had $1 million to spend, there isn't anyone in the market to fill this void.
            It will be ironic if Israel Folau works out as a power forward for the Giants. He's started kicking goals for them in that position.

            Comment

            • CJK
              Human
              • Apr 2006
              • 2170

              #7
              What's a Gin Forward????
              -

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #8
                Originally posted by CJK
                What's a Gin Forward????
                Fevola

                Comment

                • Untamed Snark
                  Senior Player
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 1375

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ScottH
                  Fevola
                  That's a big dim forward
                  Chillin' with the strange Quarks

                  Comment

                  • ScottH
                    It's Goodes to cheer!!
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 23665

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Untamed Snark
                    That's a big dim forward


                    Article:Aug 2010
                    Riewoldt, 21, and the raging favourite for the Coleman Medal, agreed to a new three-year deal worth between $500,00 and $550,000 a season. It includes incentive clauses.


                    Be tough to get him anytime soon!!

                    Comment

                    • Ruck'n'Roll
                      Ego alta, ergo ictus
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 3990

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Jeffers1984
                      In Jesse we trust. Leave him at FF and have Pyke/Seaby relieving Mummy.
                      I wonder how many lone hand ruckmen are going to suffer injuries because of the increased workload? Mummy and Jolly so far.

                      I wonder how much damage, being used in the ruck as a pinch hitter is having on young talls. Jesse for certain.

                      Roos once noted that the vast majority of premiership teams fielded two ruckmen. It's amazing how a slight change to the interchange rule (and it is, when you think about it, a slight change) and all of a sudden some (not all) teams feel unable to "waste" a spot on a second ruckman.

                      So the big question is whether our coaching panel will ever go with two ruckman again?

                      Comment

                      • pig@fullforward
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Sep 2007
                        • 87

                        #12
                        I'm still backing Jessie, he just needs to get some confidence in his own ability and be left alone at FF

                        Comment

                        • Melbournehammer
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2007
                          • 1815

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                          I wonder how many lone hand ruckmen are going to suffer injuries because of the increased workload? Mummy and Jolly so far.

                          I wonder how much damage, being used in the ruck as a pinch hitter is having on young talls. Jesse for certain.

                          Roos once noted that the vast majority of premiership teams fielded two ruckmen. It's amazing how a slight change to the interchange rule (and it is, when you think about it, a slight change) and all of a sudden some (not all) teams feel unable to "waste" a spot on a second ruckman.

                          So the big question is whether our coaching panel will ever go with two ruckman again?
                          I reckon they will. but the second ruckman has to be multidimensional. self-evidently the weagles are managing to do it, because their second rucks are more than capable of playing on the ball as ruck rovers. Few other teams are not playing someone who can assist the number 1 ruck but whose primary position is somewhere else. we just need to find whether pyke can play somewhere else semi permanently. Seaby can certainly take a mark forwards and is a pretty good set shot kicker so we do have some capacity there.

                          Comment

                          • magic.merkin
                            Senior Player
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 1199

                            #14
                            I just have this itch, that they may feel it may be time for a Fevolution.

                            Comment

                            • rb4x
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Dec 2007
                              • 968

                              #15
                              I might be showing my age but I played in the era when we only had two substitutes. They were called 19th and 20th man. We always played two ruckmen then and the resting ruckman was usually deployed in the forward pocket. Ruck is probably the hardest position to play as you need to cover as much ground as a mid and get to ball ups and throw ins as well as taking the high contested mark. You need to be big to do the tap work and so your body is probably the least athletic on the oval yet you are asked to the most work and the toughest work at that. I know the game has got faster but does not that just make it tougher for the poor ruckman. He needs a rest which he gets by going to the pine which is fair enough as it is easier than the forward pocket. We then give away the ruck advantage by using a makeshift player in the ruck and stuff up his career development as well if it is a young guy like for instance Jesse or damage his confidence if it is LRT who is pretty clueless in the ruck. In my humble opinion we are crazy going with just one genuine ruckman and even more crazy if that one ruckman is Seaby who is not fit enough or fast enough to do the job for more than three quarters. If Seaby gets injured early on we are really going to be up the creek without a paddle. Rant over.

                              Comment

                              Working...