Spangher gets a call up

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Big Al
    Veterans List
    • Feb 2005
    • 7007

    #76
    Originally posted by liz
    Should we not give him more than half a game before completely writing him off?
    Even stranger is that half was quite good.
    ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

    Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

    Comment

    • Sauce
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Jun 2011
      • 113

      #77
      seen better debuts. meh another middle of the road player with injuries.

      Comment

      • Plugger1300
        Warming the Bench
        • Feb 2010
        • 310

        #78
        Another postitive post from Big sauce
        cheer cheer

        Comment

        • Peace
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2010
          • 598

          #79
          Hey man, take a walk on the brighter side...

          Originally posted by Sauce
          seen better debuts. meh another middle of the road player with injuries.
          I've seen worse debuts, showed some positive signs in the first half for his first game playing with the seniors, hope the injury isn't too serious...

          Comment

          • giant
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2005
            • 4731

            #80
            Our expectations have got very low. What I saw was a player with the footy smarts of a lamington. His recruitment has not strengthened the quality of our list.

            Comment

            • wolftone57
              Veterans List
              • Aug 2008
              • 5838

              #81
              Originally posted by Primmy
              OK, so how many of us ressie watchers are feeling justifiably smug at present?
              We called for Spank to be included in the seniors, as a forward, and it looks like we are right on the money. Smug and Superior all at once!
              I agree he is going to be good once he gets the pace back & he leads well to a good posie.

              Comment

              • Sauce
                Suspended by the MRP
                • Jun 2011
                • 113

                #82
                Originally posted by giant
                Our expectations have got very low. What I saw was a player with the footy smarts of a lamington. His recruitment has not strengthened the quality of our list.
                How true this is.

                2010 was a good year for our discards from other clubs i guess we are hoping our luck continues.

                Comment

                • Big Al
                  Veterans List
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 7007

                  #83
                  Originally posted by giant
                  Our expectations have got very low. What I saw was a player with the footy smarts of a lamington. His recruitment has not strengthened the quality of our list.
                  What passages of play in that game demonstrated his lack of footy smarts???
                  ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                  Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                  Comment

                  • wolftone57
                    Veterans List
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 5838

                    #84
                    Originally posted by giant
                    Our expectations have got very low. What I saw was a player with the footy smarts of a lamington. His recruitment has not strengthened the quality of our list.
                    I think you must have watched another game, he lead well to crap delivery, he moved to posi well until he pulled up sore. It is quite normal for a player who has had a long lay off to pull up sore. He contributed to the team effort & hit the packs a couple of times which brought the ball to ground & gave the smalls an opportunity. We have in recent years had problems with getting enough height on the field & if Jesse can come good & this bloke deliver a whole game look forward to a great year next year.

                    We are in developmental stage this year & I am willing to wait at least three or four games to make a judgement as to where Matt Spangher is at but at least I will give him those games unlike you who haven't said anything constructive. Just negative criticism (TWICE)!!!

                    Comment

                    • wolftone57
                      Veterans List
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 5838

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Sauce
                      How true this is.

                      2010 was a good year for our discards from other clubs i guess we are hoping our luck continues.
                      The same I said to Giant applies to you nothing but negativity. How about being constructive for a change & if you think there is good reason to be deconstructive please make salient points. Come forward with some reasons for your criticism that will actually hold water.

                      Comment

                      • Melbournehammer
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2007
                        • 1815

                        #86
                        Honestly this board veers between the wildly negative and the bizarrely positive. Spangher played ok against a team of kids who have clearly hit the wall and can't wait for the end of the season.

                        It was neither a positive nor a negative return - it was simply adequate in a seventy point win.

                        As usual we are picking at the positions 19-22 on the field as though this will change the teams performance. Let's look instead at the fumbling half backs who are our first choice defensive team and how frequently they missed each other by hand and foot - and these are all in our best 15.

                        There was one occasion where Grundy, richards, Tadgh and smith were four on three and still coughed it up after hand balling to each others feet, backs and over their heads. I can only assume this was done to get a sense of what the game might be like if there was actual pressure on the field.

                        Accept spangher and Jesse for what they are big bodies who can play a kp but will not be world beaters and rely on the rest of the team to actually be that - and I'm looking at goodes and mcveigh as the startingpoints there as players who need to convert when they have taken marks inside fifty.

                        Comment

                        • Dosser
                          Just wild about Harry
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 1833

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Melbournehammer
                          Honestly this board veers between the wildly negative and the bizarrely positive. Spangher played ok against a team of kids who have clearly hit the wall and can't wait for the end of the season.

                          It was neither a positive nor a negative return - it was simply adequate in a seventy point win.

                          As usual we are picking at the positions 19-22 on the field as though this will change the teams performance. Let's look instead at the fumbling half backs who are our first choice defensive team and how frequently they missed each other by hand and foot - and these are all in our best 15.

                          There was one occasion where Grundy, richards, Tadgh and smith were four on three and still coughed it up after hand balling to each others feet, backs and over their heads. I can only assume this was done to get a sense of what the game might be like if there was actual pressure on the field.

                          Accept spangher and Jesse for what they are big bodies who can play a kp but will not be world beaters and rely on the rest of the team to actually be that - and I'm looking at goodes and mcveigh as the startingpoints there as players who need to convert when they have taken marks inside fifty.
                          I'm inclined to agree as that is what Geelong did for a few years. Mooney was a good KPP without being sensational. His big strength was his presence and ability to split packs. I will settle for that with either of these two.

                          Comment

                          • Primmy
                            Proud Tragic Swan
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 5970

                            #88
                            Actually started this thread because the ressie watchers were all for Spang playing up Forward instead of Down Back, where he usually struts, because we noted he was doing so in his ressie games, and it was working surprisingly well.

                            Strange how all your minds work. Still, nice to know we had a bit of inside observation and that it was genuine and we can sit smugly and say "we called that he was going to play up forward". That's about it really. He did his job, he helped the kid, he worked well with his team mates, he played his first senior game this season in a club that picked him up after he was delisted on the other side of the country, he looked like he was enjoying himself, he contributed to the setup without getting in anyones way, he had a bit of a strut. That's about as much as I was interested in.
                            If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                            Comment

                            Working...