Fevola a serious option?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cpt. Kirk
    Warming the Bench
    • Feb 2011
    • 351

    Fevola a serious option?



    I wouldn't mind him playing in the red and white, as long as his contract is for 1 year or 2 years but with 2 years any infringement to behavioral guidelines outlined in the contract made in the first year will terminate and void his contract going into the second year(if that is possible).

    Barry Hall was a big gamble but his issues were more on field and less controversial.
  • swansprincess
    On the Rookie List
    • Jun 2011
    • 306

    #2
    no. I don't think we need him. If we can get a new forward great; but I wouldn't be chasing fevola who has little discipline and not many years left. Not worth the gamble (no pun intended).

    Comment

    • teddys mum
      Warming the Bench
      • Apr 2010
      • 130

      #3
      Nope
      up the guts

      Comment

      • neilfws
        Senior Player
        • Aug 2009
        • 1822

        #4
        This keeps coming up. The club and most fans keep saying no. Can we put it to bed and never speak of it again?

        Comment

        • alison.z
          Regular in the Side
          • Aug 2006
          • 988

          #5
          Give Reid, Spangher and White some more games together and they could form a very formidable forward line - seen nothing but promising signs this week and last.

          Comment

          • Bas
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 4457

            #6
            Fevs a lover not a fighter.

            Pick him up in the pre-season draft. Won't bring any less than Bradshaw. He is at least trying very hard to get back into the top grade.

            To quote from the Drinker's Bible: "Those of you without sin, shout the first round".
            In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

            Comment

            • Donners
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2003
              • 1061

              #7
              Maybe the "no dickheads" policy works like the "no Homers" policy - you're allowed to have one.

              But no, I don't want him, I don't want Lovett, and I don't want any other proven idiots.

              Comment

              • goswannie14
                Leadership Group
                • Sep 2005
                • 11166

                #8
                I reckon 1-2 seasons, take the pressure off the young guys so they can develop. A forward line with Reid, Spangher, White and Fevola in it could be devestating.
                Does God believe in Atheists?

                Comment

                • pirouette
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 39

                  #9
                  no thanks

                  Comment

                  • dimelb
                    pr. dim-melb; m not f
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 6889

                    #10
                    Absolutely not. He will stuff up the development of our forward set-up.
                    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                    Comment

                    • Cheer_Cheer
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 739

                      #11
                      Yes, if there is sufficient due diligence..

                      Comment

                      • Captain
                        Captain of the Side
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 3602

                        #12
                        Yes.

                        Comment

                        • Dan
                          Warming the Bench
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 338

                          #13
                          If the players want him then yes, if not then no
                          I See It But I Don't Believe It!!!!

                          Comment

                          • DLBIA14
                            On the Rookie List
                            • May 2010
                            • 673

                            #14
                            Thinking about Fev, a move away from Melbourne and his young family is probably the stupidest thing to do. Thinking about us, do we really want a previously destructive influence surrounding our sweet, cleanskin players? Sure, he has talent, but almost like Carney he's too much of a risk. Believe me, as a Roosters fan, it really isn't worth it.

                            Anyway, we're plugging away quite well in the forwardline with a 3 pronged attack. Spang/Jesse/Reid and Goodes rotating in and out has been functioning quite well, no?

                            Comment

                            • hot potato
                              Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 1122

                              #15
                              Doubt whether Swans would consider it. Its a yes from me. I've never looked at him as a total loser.
                              "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                              Comment

                              Working...