Regarding players going to GWS...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jono2707
    Goes up to 11
    • Oct 2007
    • 3326

    #46
    Originally posted by royboy42
    Let's hope we can keep our half of the family first. The Ben part would be an added bonus.
    If we had a Pendles I would consider throwing half our salary cap at him too.... I reckon Ben is very close behind on the Pies list of players to keep next year, so I'm not getting my hopes up. With Grundy, LRT & AJ, we are looking ok down back in terms of talls anyway at this stage. I would like to see us pick up another AJ type in the draft for development, otherwise I think getting Ben Reid would not be something we'd move heaven and earth for.

    Comment

    • BSA5
      Senior Player
      • Feb 2008
      • 2522

      #47
      I'm hoping that Ben has a few niggles and is in and out of the side, doesn't get on with Buckley, Nathan Brown and Lachie Keefe turn it on down back, and Collingwood manage to keep Pendles by throwing bucketloads of money at him. That's pretty much the perfect situation for luring Ben to Sydney.
      Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

      Comment

      • Primmy
        Proud Tragic Swan
        • Apr 2008
        • 5970

        #48
        I hope the PTB go after ben, even if just to muddy the waters and give Eddie an apoplexie.....for the fun of it and entertainment of the redandwhiters.
        If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

        Comment

        • royboy42
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2006
          • 2078

          #49
          Originally posted by Primmy
          I hope the PTB go after ben, even if just to muddy the waters and give Eddie an apoplexie.....for the fun of it and entertainment of the redandwhiters.
          I surrender...PTB?

          Comment

          • Bas
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 4457

            #50
            Originally posted by royboy42
            I surrender...PTB?
            +1 No idea.

            Pendlebury is simply seeing what life at collingwood will be like with Buckley in charge. If he likes, he will stay and if not it will be GWS.

            Very clever business move on his part. GWs is building a list that will worry the Swans in a few years.

            Ben Reid at the Swans would be a dream.
            In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

            Comment

            • Kirkari
              On the Rookie List
              • Aug 2009
              • 1036

              #51
              Powers that be.
              Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

              Comment

              • Bas
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4457

                #52
                Originally posted by Kirkari
                Powers that be.
                Oh, bit of an anti-climax to our suspense.

                I thought it might have meant:

                Pinching Trade Bureau; or
                Procured Trade Booty; or
                Prophylactic Torsion Bruiser - which has nothing to do with football but paints an interesting mental picture.
                In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                Comment

                • Bas
                  Veterans List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 4457

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Primmy
                  I hope the PTB go after ben, even if just to muddy the waters and give Eddie an apoplexie.....for the fun of it and entertainment of the redandwhiters.
                  Fast forward to October 2012-

                  "Hello Eddie, this is a Procured Trade Booty call!"
                  In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                  Comment

                  • BRISWAN
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 304

                    #54
                    Originally posted by Scottee
                    Just a thought. Wouldn't it be smarter of GWS and the Swans to help each other rather than undermine each other? Wouldn't it be better to have 2 high profile clubs in Sydney rather than one? By deciding to get players from elsewhere rather than Sydney aren't we improving the local competition?
                    If the 2 teams are going to be shafting each other the competition will be weakened and it will make the career path of Sydney players uncertain. We have already noted that there are opportunities for co-operation that will be mutually advantageous (Seaby for picks, possibly Bevan and Moore as well). These players would not have to relocate and could expand the nucleus of experienced players for GWS in the early years. The Swans need to get some young blood and can afford to wait a couple of years for development. GWS can't wait too long.
                    Help an opposition club........you're kidding

                    Perhaps we could play a draw with the G.W.$ ?????????

                    Give them nothing and treat them the same way we want our players to treat them on the field...............take no prisioners !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • nomae
                      Regular in the Side
                      • May 2006
                      • 523

                      #55
                      Originally posted by BSA5
                      I'm hoping that Ben has a few niggles and is in and out of the side, doesn't get on with Buckley, Nathan Brown and Lachie Keefe turn it on down back, and Collingwood manage to keep Pendles by throwing bucketloads of money at him. That's pretty much the perfect situation for luring Ben to Sydney.
                      I really hope this happens. Doesn't seem ridiculously out of the question either. Yet let's just hope it doesn't happen the other way around :/

                      Comment

                      • cookie
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 50

                        #56
                        From what I hear rumour wise GWS is done and dusted for there uncontracted players and have locked up 3 players for the 2013 season and are not looking at getting any more big name players. If the rumours are true they will have goldstein, hurley and pendlebury in 2013. And if true means that all our players are safe. But as always time will tell

                        Comment

                        • 707
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6204

                          #57
                          Originally posted by cookie
                          From what I hear rumour wise GWS is done and dusted for there uncontracted players and have locked up 3 players for the 2013 season and are not looking at getting any more big name players. If the rumours are true they will have goldstein, hurley and pendlebury in 2013. And if true means that all our players are safe. But as always time will tell
                          GWS have taken a very different approach to recruiting. Wouldn't surprise if they only targetted a very small number of mature players at the end of this year.

                          Remember, like GCS, they have 30+ very highly rated kids to try and get games into and to fit into their best 22 within 2-3 years. They also have quite a few high draft picks in the 2012 ND.

                          Whilst they have an inflated but decreasing salary cap for about 5 years, they still need to pay increasing amounts to improving young talent and they have already "burnt" plenty of the excess $ on Scully and co.

                          So I reckon they will only target 2-3 mature players this year, possibly a good ruckman and a couple of key position players to provide structure whilst the kids develop. We may be safe from a raid.

                          Comment

                          • swansrob
                            Senior Player
                            • May 2009
                            • 1265

                            #58
                            Originally posted by cookie
                            From what I hear rumour wise GWS is done and dusted for there uncontracted players and have locked up 3 players for the 2013 season and are not looking at getting any more big name players. If the rumours are true they will have goldstein, hurley and pendlebury in 2013. And if true means that all our players are safe. But as always time will tell
                            Goldstein has signed an extension, so this rumour is now officially debunked.

                            Comment

                            Working...