i don't know what you guys are on about, Ross Gibbs played 253 games for Glenelg in the SANFL & I saw most of them, a f'ing great player who drifted down from the backpocket to kick goals. The only player in the SANFL to kick 5 goals playing as a back pocket. Kicked 8 if i remember rightly as a RR. So Bryce could have played for the Crows but did not pick him as first draft choice (a balls up) and Carlton (who had first pick) got him. the Crows went for his Glenelg team mate James Sellar who as far as I know failed to play a game. There was confusion as to the AFL rules on father/son for interstate clubs at the time and under the rules at the time because his father only played for Glenelg & not Crows he may not have been elegable. Still not sure on that one but I think either a Crows stuff up or the father/son rules only in reality applied to the VFL or ex-VFL clubs, not a level playing field.
Planning for father / sons
Collapse
X
-
-
i don't know what you guys are on about, Ross Gibbs played 253 games for Glenelg in the SANFL & I saw most of them, a f'ing great player who drifted down from the backpocket to kick goals. The only player in the SANFL to kick 5 goals playing as a back pocket. Kicked 8 if i remember rightly as a RR. So Bryce could have played for the Crows but did not pick him as first draft choice (a balls up) and Carlton (who had first pick) got him. the Crows went for his Glenelg team mate James Sellar who as far as I know failed to play a game. There was confusion as to the AFL rules on father/son for interstate clubs at the time and under the rules at the time because his father only played for Glenelg & not Crows he may not have been elegable. Still not sure on that one but I think either a Crows stuff up or the father/son rules only in reality applied to the VFL or ex-VFL clubs, not a level playing field.Comment
-
and confusion still lingers with some.....Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09Comment
-
i don't know what you guys are on about, Ross Gibbs played 253 games for Glenelg in the SANFL & I saw most of them, a f'ing great player who drifted down from the backpocket to kick goals. The only player in the SANFL to kick 5 goals playing as a back pocket. Kicked 8 if i remember rightly as a RR. So Bryce could have played for the Crows but did not pick him as first draft choice (a balls up) and Carlton (who had first pick) got him. the Crows went for his Glenelg team mate James Sellar who as far as I know failed to play a game. There was confusion as to the AFL rules on father/son for interstate clubs at the time and under the rules at the time because his father only played for Glenelg & not Crows he may not have been elegable. Still not sure on that one but I think either a Crows stuff up or the father/son rules only in reality applied to the VFL or ex-VFL clubs, not a level playing field."I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Yeah, the Crows have had what, a grand total of 0 father sons. Carlton we're lucky - Murphy could've been a Lion yeah, and Gibbs in S,A.
As for us, Nick Davis played 98? I think Schneider 98 also.Comment
-
Last edited by dimelb; 27 September 2011, 04:09 PM.He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)Comment
-
I'm pretty sure we can't do that, but as the Roos boys are in the Acadamy, they can decline an offer from Brisbane and we get a free shot at them thanks to the Acadamy.Comment
-
I remember when the Swans developed an allegience with the Swifts a few years back it was suggested we should 'introduce' a few of our potential 100+ gamers to a selection of the more athletic girls in the Swifts.
The guys would have to pledge that if the resultant offspring was a boy they would do all in their power to develop them as future Swans.
For the girls part, we would give them seasons tickets, a cap and a scarf so everybody would know who they root for...Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Father Son is an interesting one. I have a feeling that this current rule massively favours previously stable well performing clubs against teams like us. Before the 2000s we just did not have a lot of 100+ gamers, whereas C/wood Carlton, Essendon had plenty, so my feeling is the current 100 game rule might seriously benefit some clubs over others. Some of our 'great' players did not get there.
Jackson Colemann sone of Glenn is in this years but does not qualify for us. Anyway would be interesting to see some analysis some day. Geelong certainly have been massive beneficiaries, with Scarlet, Ablett, Hawkins, Callan, Blake etc.
I have a feeling the current rule is unfair. In the 80s probably we had a handful of 100+ gamers, Wright, Round, Browning, Bayes, Murphy, Mitchell, Roberts, Carter, can't think of many others whereas I would think other clubs would have 4-5 times as much
Apologies at home sick this week, was more interesting than work, just feel this rule is prejudicedYou don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby ZieglerComment
Comment