RWO rules reminder (Updated May 28th)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GongSwan
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2009
    • 1362

    #46
    Originally posted by Dirtyburt
    Sorry, my fault, it was just meant ti be a bit of harmless fun.
    I got a good laugh out of the whole topic, even if it was OT, I actually love the bits of OT banter that go on, removes me from the this player should go, or that ressies player should play rants. Fair enough to have an opinion tho
    You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #47
      Big Al is the source of many world wide problems.
      But we can only deal with the ones we have control over.

      Again, this was pointing the finger at individuals, as there are several threads that have gone astray.
      A little bit of banter is fine, but some people just like to read the footy stuff, and get annoyed by the dribble.

      Thanks!!

      Comment

      • Frog
        Retired from RWO
        • Aug 2005
        • 1898

        #48
        This is obviously not being adhered to, read or otherwise ingested by a number of RWO members as some see fit to air their dirty laundry on the boards.

        If something is in contravention of the rules, report it. We have mechanisms in place to do so. Your moderators have lives also, we cannot see everything first hand. We have now had reports that are disturbing. Reports of personal attacks and threats of visits or continuing debates outside RWO.

        This stops now (at least on our boards).

        The next member to personally attack another RWO member (adjudicated by the administrators of the site) will earn themselves a holiday.
        The next member to physically threaten another member of these boards will get a permanent holiday.

        We lost, get over it. We will lose again.
        There is another team in Sydney. Get over it. Or find a rock to crawl under.

        Cheer, cheer,
        Rick (Frog)

        Comment

        • Wardy
          The old Boiler!
          • Sep 2003
          • 6676

          #49
          Sorry Frog. I must learn to resist the temptation of bitkng back You guys do a great job. Again apologies . Alex
          I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
          Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
          AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

          Comment

          • AnnieH
            RWOs Black Sheep
            • Aug 2006
            • 11332

            #50
            You get a gold medal when your thread gets moved to the sandpit.



            (Damn, it seems I've missed some action! Where? When? Who? How?)
            Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
            Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

            Comment

            • aardvark
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2010
              • 5685

              #51
              Originally posted by AnnieH
              You get a gold medal when your thread gets moved to the sandpit.
              Maybe we should rename the Main board the Sandpit and visa versa......save time moving all those threads

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #52
                The way I see forums.
                There are several different types of posters.
                1) The one who's here to pass on their 2 cents along with everyone else and enjoy the banter
                2) The one who's here to shove their opinion down everyone's throat and gets upset if people disagree or get bored with the monotony of the poster
                3) the one who's here to read only the ON TOPIC threads.
                4) The mods/admins who are here, voluntarily, to try and keep the peace.

                Posters in 1) and 3) get tired of posters in 2).

                Posters in 4) get tired of posters in 1) and 3) who are then complaining about the posters in 2. (although we are appreciative of their assistance in pointing out problematic posts). It takes the enjoyment and fun out of coming here.

                Posters in 2) get tired if posters in 4) telling them that we don't play like that here.

                Posters in 4) then cop the wrath of the posters in 2) for trying to do their job, and sometimes from posters in 1) and 3) because posters in 4) don't appear to be doing their job.

                Posters in 4) wish there was a poster 5) group so they could cop the abuse, but that doesn't exist.

                So to posters in 1), 3) and 4), thank you keep up the good work, and we love you for your contributions.

                Posters in 2) lift your game.

                To everyone, we've said it before and we'll say it again:
                please keep threads mostly on topic.
                Please keep personal attacks out of posts, no matter how small, coz people tend to bite back, and that's when things get out of control.

                Thanks. (poster 4))
                Oh and just for your interest, I'm a mod/admin on several other sites besides RWO, so I think I have a pretty good idea about what goes on in Forums, and I see this behaviour all the time. I prefer to lose people in group 2) than the others, as group 2) cause the most work and headaches for all other groups.
                I know too many good contributors to RWO and the others sites I'm on who have walked away due to one or two clowns from group 2)
                Last edited by ScottH; 29 May 2012, 01:27 PM. Reason: fixed numbering

                Comment

                • aardvark
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5685

                  #53
                  I think there should be a "Poster 6" for those who don't like being categorised........runs and hides

                  Comment

                  • ScottH
                    It's Goodes to cheer!!
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 23665

                    #54
                    Originally posted by aardvark
                    I think there should be a "Poster 6" for those who don't like being categorised........runs and hides
                    Maybe we should have a 6) for funny looking creatures!!

                    Comment

                    • aardvark
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 5685

                      #55
                      Originally posted by ScottH
                      Maybe we should have a 6) for funny looking creatures!!

                      Comment

                      • Big Al
                        Veterans List
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 7007

                        #56
                        Originally posted by ScottH
                        Maybe we should have a 6) for funny looking creatures!!
                        People in Cat 7 are terribly afflicted by this. I am sadly one of those.

                        ImageUploadedByTapatalk1338260862.682025.jpg
                        ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                        Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16763

                          #57
                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          I prefer to lose people in group 3) than the others, as group 3) cause the most work and headaches for all other groups.
                          3? Or 2?

                          Comment

                          • ScottH
                            It's Goodes to cheer!!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 23665

                            #58
                            Originally posted by liz
                            3? Or 2?
                            Thanks liz.
                            That was a big oopsie.
                            At least I know someone read it and understood it.

                            Comment

                            • Triple B
                              Formerly 'BBB'
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 6999

                              #59
                              So it was a typo??

                              I thought nothing of it and just assumed you were saying those in type 3) were a PIA because they were forever complaining that threads were going off topic.... lol
                              Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                              Comment

                              • Ruck'n'Roll
                                Ego alta, ergo ictus
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 3990

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Triple B
                                So it was a typo??
                                I thought nothing of it and just assumed you were saying those in type 3) were a PIA because they were forever complaining that threads were going off topic.... lol
                                So can we take it that you consider yourself as a type 1 RWOer?

                                Comment

                                Working...