Bombers vs Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Doctor
    Bay 29
    • Sep 2003
    • 2757

    #16
    Let's hope the Bombers play like they've lost their aura of invincibility rather than a hurting team playing for pride on the rebound.
    Today's a draft of your epitaph

    Comment

    • GongSwan
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2009
      • 1362

      #17
      Let's hope Horse tweaks teh game plan a little to suit the slightly longer ground. I don't think our mids are as effective on the longer grounds at kicking goals
      You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

      Comment

      • nomae
        Regular in the Side
        • May 2006
        • 523

        #18
        Mitchell for Parker?

        Comment

        • GongSwan
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2009
          • 1362

          #19
          Originally posted by nomae
          Mitchell for Parker?
          Only played half a game of ressies this week, no chance
          You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

          Comment

          • aardvark
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2010
            • 5685

            #20
            Originally posted by GongSwan
            Only played half a game of ressies this week, no chance
            Maybe a slight chance now Benny is out as well??????

            Comment

            • Matt79
              Bring it on!
              • Sep 2004
              • 3143

              #21
              I would think Spahnger is almost a certainty and perhaps Nipper a chance too. Malceski or Everitt to possibly come in with the sub vest too.

              Looking at 2-3 changes. May look like this IMO

              IN: Spangher, Gordon, Malceski
              OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke
              Swannies for life!

              Comment

              • aardvark
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2010
                • 5685

                #22
                Originally posted by Matt79
                OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke
                Pyke has 40 hit outs and 10 possessions and he's getting dropped. A little bit harsh don't you think?

                Comment

                • jono2707
                  Goes up to 11
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 3326

                  #23
                  2 forced changes is enough. Pykey was good and he'll stay, especially with Mummy still a bit short of a run...

                  Comment

                  • Lucky Knickers
                    Fandom of Fabulousness
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 4220

                    #24
                    Originally posted by nomae
                    Mitchell for Parker?
                    Originally posted by GongSwan
                    Only played half a game of ressies this week, no chance
                    Wonder if the coaches will start trying to up his work rate to bring him in to cover for Parker. Seems perfect cover for him.

                    Comment

                    • Kirkari
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1036

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Matt79
                      I would think Spahnger is almost a certainty and perhaps Nipper a chance too. Malceski or Everitt to possibly come in with the sub vest too.

                      Looking at 2-3 changes. May look like this IMO

                      IN: Spangher, Gordon, Malceski
                      OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke
                      Can't see Pyke getting dropped when that combo worked so well, even in the wet. You'd think under the roof would be even better for three talls.

                      I don't know why Malceski was dropped so who knows if he's done what he needs to do to come back in. Both Spang AND Nipper might just be one wild child too many and too soon. So I'm going to vote for Spang and Mal for Parker and McGlynn.
                      Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

                      Comment

                      • Matt79
                        Bring it on!
                        • Sep 2004
                        • 3143

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Kirkari
                        Can't see Pyke getting dropped when that combo worked so well, even in the wet. You'd think under the roof would be even better for three talls.

                        I don't know why Malceski was dropped so who knows if he's done what he needs to do to come back in. Both Spang AND Nipper might just be one wild child too many and too soon. So I'm going to vote for Spang and Mal for Parker and McGlynn.
                        My concern comes with the Bomber's speed and carry. I don't think we can go with 3 talls despite being under the roof. We need some more run and carry this week.
                        Swannies for life!

                        Comment

                        • top40
                          Regular in the Side
                          • May 2007
                          • 933

                          #27
                          Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
                          2012: NAB Cup lost to Ess 2 points Etihad.....

                          C'mon Swannies, play well in Melbourne and we're in the top two by the end of the round.

                          Its been a long time since the Swans beat a top 6 team in Melbourne in an Away game. The last time was 5 years ago, when they beat 3rd place Hawthorn in Round 11 at the MCG. In effect, for the past 12 years, all of the Swans' Away wins in Melbourne against a top 6 side have been only against two clubs, the Hawks and the Demons:

                          2007 Round 11 v Hawthorn (3rd) MCG
                          2006 Round 19 v Melbourne (3rd) MCG
                          2005 Round 16 v Melbourne (4th) Docklands
                          2004 Round 20 v Melbourne (3rd) Docklands
                          2002 Round 21 v Melbourne (5th) MCG
                          2001 Round 15 v Hawthorn (2nd) MCG

                          The last time Sydney beat a highly ranked Essendon team in Melbourne was way, way back in Round 12, 1989, (nearly quarter of century ago), when they beat then the 4rd place Bombers at Windy Hill 55 to 50.

                          I agree: c'mon Swans, just for once can we have a good win in the Victorian capital against a quality team.

                          Comment

                          • swansrob
                            Senior Player
                            • May 2009
                            • 1265

                            #28
                            Originally posted by top40
                            Its been a long time since the Swans beat a top 6 team in Melbourne in an Away game. The last time was 5 years ago, when they beat 3rd place Hawthorn in Round 11 at the MCG
                            Elimination Final last year?

                            Comment

                            • top40
                              Regular in the Side
                              • May 2007
                              • 933

                              #29
                              Originally posted by swansrob
                              Elimination Final last year?
                              "Away" with a capital "A" meaning within the context of the Home and Away season.

                              Comment

                              • DLBIA14
                                On the Rookie List
                                • May 2010
                                • 673

                                #30
                                Feeling a little sick in the stomach at the prospect of this game. No Goodes, no Parker, no Rohan, no McGlynn, a very hungry and much improved Essendon, a very un-Sydney like Sydney who seem to lack that characteristic desperation when the going gets tough this year, a bad record at Melbourne, a physically tough game against the Dogs, a 6 day break...

                                If we win this I think it might be miraculous. I really hope we get the job done, but I'm not hold out much hope. Whatever happens I hope it's not a close one like the last few games against the Dons. Real heart-racing sort of stuff and I don't know if I could take that.

                                Comment

                                Working...