Changes for Rnd 16 V The Eagles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • top40
    Regular in the Side
    • May 2007
    • 933

    #16
    Originally posted by Dirtyburt
    Sounds like a Benny hill sketch
    What a predictable response from "Dirtyburt"

    Comment

    • Swanner
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2006
      • 186

      #17
      I actually think lrt has been very important in getting our forward structure right. I think we need Armstrong in for his pace even as a sub. Who ever misses out will be very unlucky.

      Comment

      • Nico
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 11339

        #18
        Bird stays in because we need all the run with players we can muster against the WCE. LRT goes to the backline to help cover for all their talls. So who plays on Cox and Nicnat when they are resting up front. They are bound to try to stretch our lack of height down back. What I noticed against North was that they were caught quite a bit for pace and on the hop with North's quick rebound. They got back into it as North started to run out of legs. So we need to work the ball quickly into our forward line and through the midfield.
        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

        Comment

        • Captain
          Captain of the Side
          • Feb 2004
          • 3602

          #19
          Originally posted by Nico
          Bird stays in because we need all the run with players we can muster against the WCE. LRT goes to the backline to help cover for all their talls. So who plays on Cox and Nicnat when they are resting up front. They are bound to try to stretch our lack of height down back. What I noticed against North was that they were caught quite a bit for pace and on the hop with North's quick rebound. They got back into it as North started to run out of legs. So we need to work the ball quickly into our forward line and through the midfield.
          Not sure we lack height down back?

          Grundy, Richards, Johnson and as you say maybe LRT. Looks pretty strong on the height front to me!

          Comment

          • longmile
            Crumber
            • Apr 2011
            • 3367

            #20
            I'm sorry but LRT was shocking last night. He seemed to fall over every time he ran towards the ball. LRT is a backman not a forward, he has no forward instincts. Spangher would take LRT's role perfectly. I'd love to see Everitt and LRT out for Spangher and TDL and then we actually have what could be a threatening forward line which could see us take the final step to being premiership contenders. How good would we be if Rohan wasn't injured! Our depth this year has been outstanding! Very excited for the next 2-3 yrs.
            But overall good game last night and always great to knock the Pies off the top of the ladder!
            However I doubt there will be any changes for next week, as Parker is probably still another week away and Longmire would never drop LRT, only Mattner coming in for Armstrong or maybe give Johnson a rest.

            Comment

            • Dirtyburt
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Apr 2012
              • 853

              #21
              Originally posted by longmile
              I'm sorry but LRT was shocking last night. He seemed to fall over every time he ran towards the ball. LRT is a backman not a forward, he has no forward instincts. Spangher would take LRT's role perfectly. I'd love to see Everitt and LRT out for Spangher and TDL and then we actually have what could be a threatening forward line which could see us take the final step to being premiership contenders. How good would we be if Rohan wasn't injured! Our depth this year has been outstanding! Very excited for the next 2-3 yrs.
              But overall good game last night and always great to knock the Pies off the top of the ladder!
              However I doubt there will be any changes for next week, as Parker is probably still another week away and Longmire would never drop LRT, only Mattner coming in for Armstrong or maybe give Johnson a rest.
              Why would we rest Johnson?

              Comment

              • Kirkari
                On the Rookie List
                • Aug 2009
                • 1036

                #22
                Originally posted by longmile
                ...and Longmire would never drop LRT, only Mattner coming in for Armstrong or maybe give Johnson a rest.
                Longmire will drop LRT just as soon as LRT's not delivering what he's asked to every week, or when there's a better option available for a given game. (I just have this saved so I can copy and paste now.)

                Parker's a good chance to come back next week, even with the big ground. He's just such a good little player. He was clearly on another level in the Reserves and with a bye, I can't see them leaving him out just on lacking a bit of fitness. He'll probably be the sub. Everitt had a couple of wobbles but overall probably did enough to keep his spot. Armstrong is likely to be the unlucky one.

                Assuming Marty's back, Mal is also be dropped again - though I liked most of his game too.

                Going over to watch so this week is going to seem like a looong wait!
                Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

                Comment

                • Kirkari
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 1036

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Dirtyburt
                  Why would we rest Johnson?
                  Because, to quote Rhyce Shaw, he's held together with sticky tape. Though unless he's actually injured, I don't see it.
                  Superman still wears Brett Kirk Pyjamas

                  Comment

                  • ShockOfHair
                    One Man Out
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 3668

                    #24
                    I'm happy for LRT to stay in the team because a) we're winning and b) he seems like a nice guy. I thought he was OK yesterday in those moments when he was on his feet.
                    In the last two games TV commentators have showered unprompted praise on LRT. Words like "swingman" and "important to the team structure" were used, though no-one has come right out and said he's playing well.
                    The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                    Comment

                    • teddys mum
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 130

                      #25
                      Barring injuries, no changes is my bet - although I wish we could squeeze TDL in who would go well at Subi.
                      up the guts

                      Comment

                      • teddys mum
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 130

                        #26
                        Considering we aren't playing the pies or hawks at the MCG this home and away season, then next week will surely be the hardest game we are likely to play outside of finals
                        up the guts

                        Comment

                        • Doctor
                          Bay 29
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 2757

                          #27
                          While there are a lot of valid reasons behind not changing a winning team, and Horse has consistently demonstrated his selection policy, I think TDL has to come into consideration for next week. I think we're a little tall and not quite mobile enough for Subiaco (or whatever it's called this week). I'm not going to nominate a fall guy, because everyone's putting in right now and it's too easy to single individuals out and turn the thread into a witch hunt. Wish we had Gaz for next week though.
                          Today's a draft of your epitaph

                          Comment

                          • Aaron
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 805

                            #28
                            The forecast for next Sunday in Perth will be a few showers and not sure when McVeigh need to play Dad's duty - So some factors in the the changes

                            Comment

                            • crackedactor
                              Regular in the Side
                              • May 2012
                              • 919

                              #29
                              Unfit Parker

                              Originally posted by mcs
                              I'd doubt Parker will be in next week - by all reports he looked pretty short of a run today in the reserves (I didn't get up in time to see any of it), and you don't want to risk an unfit player at the big expanses of Subiaco. Bird struggled a bit today, but has had an excellent season, and is so important in close for us as well.
                              Agree 100%. The big Subiaco ground will definetly find out a player who is not fully fit. Parker has missed too much football. I would include Mattner for Everitt. Cannot drop Malecski as he played his best game for about 3 years. Everitt will be stiif, because he did not play that bad. Bird had a poor game, but he has had some good ones in the past and in Subiaco you need endurance to last the 4 quarters, which Bird has. This is the first time this season that I find it diifcult to drop anyone!

                              Comment

                              • Bloody Hell
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 3085

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Dirtyburt
                                No, LRT yet again showed why he is one of first on the team sheet. Fantastic exhibition of second efforts, working to get to a contest, holding the ball in the forward line, bringing the ball to ground as boundary line outlet. He was very very good
                                Yeah...Full Forward kicks zero goals in flogging.
                                The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                                Comment

                                Working...