Changes for Rnd 16 V The Eagles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xie Shan
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 2929

    #76
    If Lewis Stevenson plays, will this game set a record for the most number of players named Lewis to take part in a match?

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16778

      #77
      Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
      Interesting that Walsh has been named on the extended bench. Could they be considering dropping Pykey for Walsh and using LRT as second ruck? Mummy has been working up close to full fitness. I don't wish to see this happen, ( im a big fan of the moose) but it may be an option they are considering.. Could also just be to show Walsh he is doing everything right in the 2's and is in line for a call up if a spot arises.
      I reckon they are just taking him over to give him some experience preparing with the senior team. He has had a pretty continuous last couple of months playing with the reserves so maybe they judge he doesn't need the extra training session the reserves will do over the weekend as much as some other players. And his form has been good enough to suggest that if he is required to come into the side for a late injury, he can play his role.

      Comment

      • liz
        Veteran
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 16778

        #78
        Originally posted by Xie Shan
        If Lewis Stevenson plays, will this game set a record for the most number of players named Lewis to take part in a match?
        Did we ever have all three of our Lewises play in the same game last year? I think Johnston only played a couple of games, so quite likely we didn't.

        Comment

        • Xie Shan
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2003
          • 2929

          #79
          I was wrong! All three of our Lewises played against North Melbourne last year.

          Comment

          • swanspant12
            On the Rookie List
            • Oct 2009
            • 593

            #80
            Originally posted by Dirtyburt
            LRT may be used in exactly that role to tag cox around the ground.
            Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.
            LRT. Lord Roberts-Thompson. He may look like the Munster, but looks can be deceiving.


            2012 Bloods Premiers.

            Comment

            • Go Swannies
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2003
              • 5697

              #81
              Originally posted by swanspant12
              Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.
              Pyke may have the speed but I don't think he has the smarts. I'm guessing LRT at least in our forward half and Reg in the back half.

              Comment

              • BillyRayCypress
                On the Rookie List
                • May 2012
                • 1379

                #82
                My money is that there will be no change to last weeks team.

                Makes no sense to have Mattner on the bench and then the person who replaced him last week in the side. Unless Mattner is a no go.

                If anyone came in I would hope that its TDL.
                Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

                Comment

                • Bloody Hell
                  Senior Player
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3085

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Dirtyburt
                  LRT may be used in exactly that role to tag cox around the ground.
                  We can only hope.
                  The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                  Comment

                  • Ruck'n'Roll
                    Ego alta, ergo ictus
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 3990

                    #84
                    Originally posted by BillyRayCypress
                    My money is that there will be no change to last weeks team.
                    I suspect so too.
                    If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
                    Will this make us top heavy?

                    Comment

                    • Dirtyburt
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 853

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                      I suspect so too.
                      If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
                      Will this make us top heavy?
                      I think they will not allow cox to drop back into the whole. I suspect that LRT will assigned the task of manning him when he is not in the square. Similar role he played on Gardiner in 2005

                      Comment

                      • Mr Magoo
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2008
                        • 1255

                        #86
                        If the order of the interchange sent out by the swans in the match preview is any indicator then it may be Everitt, Armstrong and Walsh will be the emergencies.

                        Would make sense - armstrong for mattner, tdl for everitt.

                        Comment

                        • Nico
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 11339

                          #87
                          Originally posted by swanspant12
                          Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.
                          Maybe they will tag team him. On the ball Pyke gets him, up forward LRT takes over.
                          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                          Comment

                          • ugg
                            Can you feel it?
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15970

                            #88
                            I don't think we will put LRT back on Cox, not from the start anyway. Whoever is on Cox or NicNat while they are playing as forward will require help and we may try and engineer a loose man, or the "plus one" as Rodney Eade likes to call it, in Mattner or Johnson to assist.
                            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                            Reserves WIKI -
                            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                            Comment

                            • giant
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4731

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                              I suspect so too.
                              If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
                              Will this make us top heavy?
                              THis is what I think will be occupying the minds of the match committee most - to LRT, or not to LRT. Would be a very handy back up defender if the resting rucks become a handful for Grundy/Ted, but may be exposed at Subi as one tall too many if played as a forward. Not easy.

                              Comment

                              • Go Swannies
                                Veterans List
                                • Sep 2003
                                • 5697

                                #90
                                Perth forecast -

                                Sunday A shower or two. Min 6 Max 19

                                Comment

                                Working...