Judd four :-)

[707]

We don't need to tag him, nice!

[barry]

Should have got more.

It was one of those incident I just couldnt watch.... like when someone does a knee.

[Beerman]

Carlton should give him an extra week for stupidity! Why a player who has that much class feels the need to resort to acts like that is beyond me. Good for the Swans though.

[Dosser]

I like Judd as a player but it seems you don't want to be on the ground with your eyes or arm unprotected if he is around.

[Cheer_Cheer]

He only seems to do these things when someone is holding the victim down.. I am glad we wont be seeing him in 3 weeks time.. I would hate to see him grabbing, gouging or whatever one of our boys..

[Dirtyburt]

Zeibell gets the same 4 weeks going for the ball as Judd does for a dog act. No justice

[swanspant12]

No judd against us Brilliant. Murphy, Carazzo, Simpson, Scotland, Robinson, McClean their only true midfielders. I want to absolutely flog this mob. So sick of losing to them recently. Jack, Kennedy, Hannebery, Bolton, Jetta, McVeigh, Parker, Bird, O'Keefe we should have enough rotation to flog them in the midfield.

[BSA5]

Kieran Jack is going to have a field day!

[giant]

Great shame, would have loved the challenge. No really.

OK maybe not.

[swanspant12]

Great shame, would have loved the challenge. No really.

OK maybe not.

Stuff that, i wanna beat them comfortably

[Cheer_Cheer]

Stuff that, i wanna beat them comfortably

This year % is going to make a big difference.. So yeah.. I would love to rip Carlton to pieces..

[Red]

This year % is going to make a big difference.. So yeah.. I would love to rip Carlton to pieces..

Carlton could well win the next two (against Bulldogs & Tigers) which would give them Finals hope. It would be sweet then if The Swans went and emphatically crushed those hopes

[GongSwan]

I still think he should have got more, attacking a defenceless player is weak. He should have got more than Wellingham(who got the discount). The whole system sucks really

[liz]

It is really hard to know what the right sentence was because we have nothing remotely similar to compare it to. But once the tribunal came down and determined it was indeed intentional, I was slightly surprised that he only got four weeks, given he had a 30% loading that could have been added (at the tribunal's discretion).

[Go Swannies]

I'm with you Liz. I thought they'd want to make a firmer statement and he'd get seven (the rest of the season). Apparently he got 3 and 1 for his loading. Same as a head high when there seemed much more intent here and the AFL argued it was bringing the AFL into disrepute - the same claim as made against Hall, I think.

Carlton are apparently talking about appealing so it may yet be 7.