Proof the umpires robbed us........
Collapse
X
-
There is poor umpiring in every game, we don't really know if it changes the outcome of the game when we won the free count by double, although most of them came in the first q when we were actually crushing them. We should have been further in front and it wouldn't have even been an issueYou can't argue with a sick mind - Joe WalshComment
-
There is poor umpiring in every game, we don't really know if it changes the outcome of the game when we won the free count by double, although most of them came in the first q when we were actually crushing them. We should have been further in front and it wouldn't have even been an issue
Generally, a poor decision has very little impact on the outcome of a game and I understand we should have been further ahead.
However, two poor decisions in the last minutes of a game, which costs us 2 goals (one for and one against) has a huge impact.
Those poor decisions cost us the game.Comment
-
There is poor umpiring in every game, we don't really know if it changes the outcome of the game when we won the free count by double, although most of them came in the first q when we were actually crushing them. We should have been further in front and it wouldn't have even been an issue
However I cant agree that the Swans can feel satisfied that such poor decisions were made at critically the dying minutes of a close game. whereupon it impacted directly on the scores. Hawthorn should not have got the goal for the push in the back decision. An extraordinarily poor decision for a so called first rate professional umpire to make. The no 50 metre decision was more in the area of grey. However it represented the first time I have ever witnessed an umpire state that the throwing away of a ball was not intentional.in the context of consistency a very bad 'non' decision
And pure free kick counts is not a measure of the quality of the umpiring. How many frees went against the Hawks that were both clearly wrong and impacted on the scoreline? None that i am aware.
What REALLY bugs me is the limited reporting of the highly significant decisions in the newspapers' reports of the game. It is like the jouros are too timid to write about it, (with exceptions, but even still the reporting seems like an afterthought)Last edited by top40; 28 August 2012, 05:12 PM.Comment
-
At one level these comments are balanced and sensible.
However I cant agree that the Swans can feel satisfied that such poor decisions were made at critically the dying minutes of a close game. whereupon it impacted directly on the scores. Hawthorn should not have got the goal for the push in the back decision. An extraordinarily poor decision for a so called first rate professional umpire to make. The no 50 metre decision was more in the area of grey. However it represented the first time I have ever witnessed an umpire state that the throwing away of a ball was not intentional.in the context of consistency a very bad 'non' decision
And pure free kick counts is not a measure of the quality of the umpiring. How many frees went against the Hawks that were both clearly wrong and impacted on the scoreline? None that i am aware.
What REALLY bugs me is the limited reporting of the highly significant decisions in the newspapers' reports of the game. It is like the jouros are too timid to write about it, (with exceptions, but even still the reporting seems like an afterthought)Comment
-
Someone umping at under 14 level would have got those calls correct. The crowd howl was the loudest ive ever heard."He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.Comment
-
Proof the umpires robbed us........
I thought we had a fair run with the umps in the first quarter and a bit when we got off to a good start. A lot of decisions I thought were pulled out of thin air seemed to go our way. Can't recall what the were now, but remember thinking " geez, we're getting everything so far ! " in terms of free kicks. I refuse to blame poor umpiring decisions for a loss. We were in a position to win that game and we let it slip. The umpires didn't pile on 6 hawthorn goals in the space of 10 minutes in the 2nd qtr. The things our players and coaching staff did and didn't do had far more bearing on the game than any poor or non decision by the umps IMO. That being said, I was still extremely proud pf pur boys after the game and not too disheartened. We took it right up to them and nearly got there. I think we will beat the cats this week, and will have two home finals to look forward to.Comment
-
I think a fair indication of the bizarre nature of the free and the non-50 metre penalty was Longmire's open mouth and dropped jaw after each incident.First time I have seen him look that stunned since he has been coach and both in the last quarter of the same match.Go figure!!
The upside of the decisions is that we have every reason to believe that we can beat this mob, especially with a better centre square set-up when Jude gets back.We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!Comment
-
Heard on SEN Radio
I think a fair indication of the bizarre nature of the free and the non-50 metre penalty was Longmire's open mouth and dropped jaw after each incident.First time I have seen him look that stunned since he has been coach and both in the last quarter of the same match.Go figure!!
The upside of the decisions is that we have every reason to believe that we can beat this mob, especially with a better centre square set-up when Jude gets back.Comment
Comment