Rookie Seelection details

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyRayCypress
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2012
    • 1379

    Rookie Seelection details

    Emma Glamazone Photo has provided details for next season

    Historic drop in rookie draft numbers as clubs lose faith
    Nothing like a good light bulb moment.
  • ugg
    Can you feel it?
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 15968

    #2
    We currently have 2 known rookies, Shane Biggs in Category A and Alex Starling will be drafted into Category B. This leaves a minimum of 3 more Cat A and a maximum of 2 more Cat B rookies.
    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
    Reserves WIKI -
    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

    Comment

    • ugg
      Can you feel it?
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 15968

      #3
      Daniel Robinson will be added to Cat B

      Reserves live updates (Twitter)
      Reserves WIKI -
      Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

      Comment

      • SPC
        Pushing for Selection
        • Jan 2011
        • 95

        #4
        Originally posted by ugg
        Daniel Robinson will be added to Cat B

        http://www.sydneyswans.com.au/tabid/...?newsid=150670
        What do you know about Daniel Robinson?

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16761

          #5
          If they were going to rookie list one of our scholarship players, I am not surprised it is Robinson. He did get good raps for his U18 championship performances and was also quite impressive in the limited number of NEAFL games he played. He's a bit of a Hannebery type - hard running (though I have no idea if his natural endurance is at the level Hanners' was when he first joined the club), solidly built, not overly quick but hard working. He mostly played at NEAFL level as a mostly 'outside' link up player rather than an extractor from contests but, like Hanners, he will put his head over the ball when he needs to. We'll need to see more of him to find out if he might become a true "inside" player in time.

          By reporting that Robinson has been added to the list, this presumably means that, at this stage, Stephen Weir hasn't. He was the other one who I thought might be in with a shot, and maybe he is still some chance.

          Comment

          • ugg
            Can you feel it?
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 15968

            #6
            Do you mean Stephen Wray or Jordan Weir?
            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
            Reserves WIKI -
            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16761

              #7
              Sorry, meant Stephen Wray

              Comment

              • ShockOfHair
                One Man Out
                • Dec 2007
                • 3668

                #8
                What's the reason for the contraction in rookie spots from next year? I'd have thought that clubs were making successful use out of rookie-ing a la Callinan and JPod.
                The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                Comment

                • Nico
                  Veterans List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 11337

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ShockOfHair
                  What's the reason for the contraction in rookie spots from next year? I'd have thought that clubs were making successful use out of rookie-ing a la Callinan and JPod.
                  Maybe free agency was a factor. I reckon the current rash of picking up used players will taper off and youth will again be the go in a couple of years.
                  http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16761

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ShockOfHair
                    What's the reason for the contraction in rookie spots from next year? I'd have thought that clubs were making successful use out of rookie-ing a la Callinan and JPod.
                    The contraction in rookie spots is nothing like what is being reported by several journalists. I am not surprised some are getting it wrong, but I am surprised at someone like Emma Quayle reporting it so poorly. There is a reduction in the three extra spots that were made available while the two new teams were set up. But this was only ever a temporary concession. It means that the standard number of normal rookies is now six. Things have been complicated by the simultaneous expansion of senior lists to a maxiumum of 40 - which really just eliminates the 'outside' veteran ' nominated rookie allowances. All clubs can now have 38-40 senior players and 4-6 "non-special" rookies, to a maximum of 44. Which is really not the drastic change that some journos are suggesting.

                    Comment

                    • Ludwig
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 9359

                      #11
                      Originally posted by liz
                      The contraction in rookie spots is nothing like what is being reported by several journalists. I am not surprised some are getting it wrong, but I am surprised at someone like Emma Quayle reporting it so poorly. There is a reduction in the three extra spots that were made available while the two new teams were set up. But this was only ever a temporary concession. It means that the standard number of normal rookies is now six. Things have been complicated by the simultaneous expansion of senior lists to a maxiumum of 40 - which really just eliminates the 'outside' veteran ' nominated rookie allowances. All clubs can now have 38-40 senior players and 4-6 "non-special" rookies, to a maximum of 44. Which is really not the drastic change that some journos are suggesting.
                      Thanks Liz. I've been searching the net for days and simply could not find this simple explanation of how the new system works.

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16761

                        #12
                        My information is based on what Ugg reported a few days ago, rather than any original research.

                        Comment

                        Working...