Official AFL player ratings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #16
    Originally posted by Swansongster
    Outraged that they can ignore LRT.
    Given his lack of disposals in the last few weeks, it's understandable.

    Comment

    • Primmy
      Proud Tragic Swan
      • Apr 2008
      • 5970

      #17
      What he said. +1
      If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        #18
        Originally posted by satchmopugdog
        Marc Murphy....pluuueesse give me strength. Good but over-rated..we have McVeigh who is the equal of him let alone other clubs....I'd have Priddis ahead of him...I'd still have Judd over him...he hasn't enough of the mongrel

        Totes.

        Most of our midfield is way ahead of Murphy, having proven themselves in finals and grand finals. In fact, any Hawthron, Collingwood or Geelong midfielders is ahead of him.

        Comment

        • R-1
          Senior Player
          • Aug 2005
          • 1042

          #19
          Re: Official AFL player ratings

          The full rankings is up. Our midfield rates very highly.

          Interesting and thorough methodology too.

          Comment

          • alt_mattr
            On the Rookie List
            • Mar 2013
            • 169

            #20
            Mike Pyke has been shafted by the system. Something like this will always throw up nonsensical results somewhere but I wish it wasn't Pykey!!!!!

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              #21
              Originally posted by alt_mattr
              Mike Pyke has been shafted by the system. Something like this will always throw up nonsensical results somewhere but I wish it wasn't Pykey!!!!!
              Naitanui is rated the top ruck.
              Hannebery doesn't appear anywhere.
              And of last season's best back six, only Nic Mal and Ted appear on the defenders list. No Rhyce, no Nick Smith, no AJ. Amazing.
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • satchmopugdog
                Bandicoots ears
                • Apr 2004
                • 3691

                #22
                [QUOTE=R-1;610605

                Interesting and thorough methodology too.[/QUOTE]

                That sentence made my eyes glaze over and cross at the same time. Why must numbers dictate a players value?...because it appeals to black and white thinkers who like things to be right or wrong, no grey areas...value is not numerical.
                "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                Comment

                • i'm-uninformed2
                  Reefer Madness
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 4653

                  #23
                  Only just saw this crap. Rioli??!! There needs to be a weighting for the big games. As in, I did jack s... in a grand final, played a stinker and got smashed by my old school captain. Pants down brother.

                  Think about it. Rioli plays to the hype and how he performs against duds, what's the result? Rioli plays how he played against a real team and a real player, what's the result?

                  Oh yeah baby, we're premiers.

                  Case closed. Give him a zero score.

                  (Having said that, still wished we recruited him over Vez)
                  'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                  Comment

                  • i'm-uninformed2
                    Reefer Madness
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 4653

                    #24
                    I'm laughing harder.

                    Colin Sylvia better than Dan Hannebery . . . Too funny

                    Jack Watts ranked higher than Ted Richards as a defender . . . Spot it, I'm going to wet myself.
                    'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                    Comment

                    • mcs
                      Travelling Swannie!!
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 8190

                      #25
                      Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                      I'm laughing harder.

                      Colin Sylvia better than Dan Hannebery . . . Too funny

                      Jack Watts ranked higher than Ted Richards as a defender . . . Spot it, I'm going to wet myself.
                      Hehehe what a misrepresentation some of the ratings are! I know that any statistical based system will always struggle in the eye of fans, as it forgets the qualitative aspects of football and the unquantifiable parts of the game. But you can tell where the bias lies, as its just like Brownlow voting - 26 out of the top 30 are midfielders.

                      The defenders is where the stats really lie in my opinion (and fail to take into consideration non-quantifiable aspects). Shannon Hurn, Brent Reilly, Andrew Walker, Pearce Hanley and Jack Watts all better defenders than Ted Richards. Someone's having a laugh!
                      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                      Comment

                      • Nico
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 11348

                        #26
                        Originally posted by mcs
                        Hehehe what a misrepresentation some of the ratings are! I know that any statistical based system will always struggle in the eye of fans, as it forgets the qualitative aspects of football and the unquantifiable parts of the game. But you can tell where the bias lies, as its just like Brownlow voting - 26 out of the top 30 are midfielders.

                        The defenders is where the stats really lie in my opinion (and fail to take into consideration non-quantifiable aspects). Shannon Hurn, Brent Reilly, Andrew Walker, Pearce Hanley and Jack Watts all better defenders than Ted Richards. Someone's having a laugh!
                        None of those players featured in the Golden Fist Award. Spud will be outraged; Teddy won it.
                        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                        Comment

                        • 707
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6204

                          #27
                          Jack Watts better than Teddy - any chance we could get him to the Swans in this years trading? That would give us TWO top defenders next year :-)

                          Also, maybe we could swap that dud Hanners for Sylvia in the same trade package with the Tankers.

                          Ooooh, roll on 2014 if we could pull those trades off!

                          On a more serious note, I wonder what value the Tankers could get for Watts later this year? IMO I reckon he is worth a 20-25 pick and would be good value for a top team for that level of pick. He's going to end up a nobody if he stays at the Tankers.

                          Comment

                          • mcs
                            Travelling Swannie!!
                            • Jul 2007
                            • 8190

                            #28
                            Originally posted by 707
                            Jack Watts better than Teddy - any chance we could get him to the Swans in this years trading? That would give us TWO top defenders next year :-)

                            Also, maybe we could swap that dud Hanners for Sylvia in the same trade package with the Tankers.

                            Ooooh, roll on 2014 if we could pull those trades off!

                            On a more serious note, I wonder what value the Tankers could get for Watts later this year? IMO I reckon he is worth a 20-25 pick and would be good value for a top team for that level of pick. He's going to end up a nobody if he stays at the Tankers.
                            No doubt that in a better team he'll look a hell of a lot better player. I wonder if the same applies for Tom Scully as well.
                            "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                            Comment

                            • dimelb
                              pr. dim-melb; m not f
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 6889

                              #29
                              Originally posted by mcs
                              No doubt that in a better team he'll look a hell of a lot better player. I wonder if the same applies for Tom Scully as well.
                              From the little I've seen, Scully is looking pretty good right now. I bet he's glad he's not at Melbourne.
                              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                              Comment

                              Working...