LRT in 2005 GF

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sharp9
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 2508

    #31
    Judd had 29 disposals fro 2 effective kicks! One was an up an under to a man more than 20 metres in the clear on the HFF.....and the other was a really bad kick to a player on the lead....ball eventually got to him on the bounce. Judd got a ridiculous amount of clearances but only a handfull were made good use of (usually by dishing out the back to Wirrapanda). Appalling choice for NS. Buchanan was BOG by a country mile. I can't recall a single thing Fosdike did. Not one. I can think of at least 5 great moments from Buchanan. Remember that we won by a kick. Without question the player most missed if you removed one would be Buchanan.
    "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

    Comment

    • Doctor
      Bay 29
      • Sep 2003
      • 2757

      #32
      I agree on Embley in 06 but my recollection was that Fosdike was excellent all game and was my call at the time to win (FWIW). Good points about Buchanan though.

      Judd shouldn't have won but he did and that's that. I'm sure we'd rather have the Flag than the Norm Smith but it does annoy me somewhat that a Swan didn't win one. ROK winning last year was a nice bit of redemption.
      Today's a draft of your epitaph

      Comment

      • CJK
        Human
        • Apr 2006
        • 2170

        #33
        It's a nice footnote of our 'team first' ethos that in a winning GF side no one got the Norm Smith.

        On the other hand; *&*& Chris Judd
        -

        Comment

        • Nolie
          On the wing
          • Jul 2004
          • 522

          #34
          Originally posted by Plugger1300
          I have always thought Amon deserved the Medal - was the man for all the big moments. Now i may be slightly biased as i had $20 on him @ $71.

          Judd was inspirational anyone who thinks he wasn't one of the best 3 players on the ground is delusional.

          Fosdike
          Amon
          Judd
          Cox

          any deserved to win
          Some of these posts are way too conciliatory. The award to Judd was an outrage. Unfortunately at that time the media were still head over heels in love with him. The channel ten commentators, the irritating Stephen Quartrmain in particular, were masturbating themselves every time he touched it . "Judd's on fiire" wanks on Quartermain in the first quarter "How many touches has he had' . ""Nine" says someone. A few seconds later a very understated " LRT has had 9 possessions for the Swans".
          At another point in time Quartermain gives him credit for a "clearance" when he gets a free kick from a boundary throw in! Just BS.

          Someone has said it elsewhere whereas Judd had plenty of touches they were largely ineffective. Jared Crouch dispossesed him late, out-ran him, in the first quarter to give the swans the lead late. the Swans led at every break of the GF. Judd was exceptionally quiet for a long period when Crouch was on him but Crouch got little credit. Crouch hurt his ankle which helped Judd back in the game.
          Fosdike was Swans best possession getter and did many good things. He had more touches than Buchanan. But Buchanan did two brilliant things in the last quarter including a desperate tackle (I think on Judd from memory) and of course the winning goal.

          The NS should have gone to Fosdike, Buchanan, LRT and Judd in that order. Someone suggested Cox was the Eagles' best. I shall have to r-watch the game.
          Even Paul Roos after the game said it was dissapointing that the NS did not go to a player on the winning team.

          But umpires and judges get it wrong. In fact I think they mistook or thought that Hanneberry was O'keefe (they both have blond hair) in the 2012 GF. Got them mixed up. O'keefe got the NS but it was probably meant to be Hanners.

          Comment

          Working...