Does the cap come in the new membership packs?
AFL sets interchange cap
Collapse
X
-
-
Great!
...no wait, I mean the opposite.
I can't see any way this improves the game. Sure it will open it up more, but it's open enough. As noted the endurance player will get places ahead of speed players, even more so than at the moment. No more burning off opponents or bursting from pack ball in hand.The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.Comment
-
You can just hear the collective shuffle of the feet of potential converts the first time this comes in during a Suns or Giants game. "You can'd do what now? I give up!"I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Comment
-
Yesterday on AFL 360 they showed the interchange averages over the last 10 years and can you believe in 2005 the AFL average was in the 30s!!Comment
-
A month or so back there was an article in one of the papers with the interchange averages for each team this year and surprisingly we were at the bottom with around 120 from memory. It could be due to the injuries that we have had this year?
Yesterday on AFL 360 they showed the interchange averages over the last 10 years and can you believe in 2005 the AFL average was in the 30s!!"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
The AFL is stacked with former players and former coaches so they constantly think things should go back to the way they were. Why should we think 30 is better than 130? Can't stand this pointless tinkering. It won't achieve what they want either, just like the sub didn't achieve what they wanted. They are just stacking up half-baked ideas on top of each other.Comment
-
Should go back to 19th and 20th men who permanently replace a player who comes off. Means the best players are always on the field and tests out the real endurance of players. Maybe we'd get back to some blokes playing in a position and get rid of this eyesore of thirty six blokes around the ball. People criticised the flood in the back line. The forward press is worse since the ball is trapped in the forward line and the outriders just send it back in if it ever is cleared. Supporters of the constant rotations say that the game has evolved to get rid of the flood. No it hasn't! The flood has just moved up the other end.Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.Comment
-
Should go back to 19th and 20th men who permanently replace a player who comes off. Means the best players are always on the field and tests out the real endurance of players. Maybe we'd get back to some blokes playing in a position and get rid of this eyesore of thirty six blokes around the ball. People criticised the flood in the back line. The forward press is worse since the ball is trapped in the forward line and the outriders just send it back in if it ever is cleared. Supporters of the constant rotations say that the game has evolved to get rid of the flood. No it hasn't! The flood has just moved up the other end.Comment
-
Yep, another stupid, unnecessary, complex rule to adjust to for another year, that the players hate, the viewers hate. That's like making two geniuses play chess against each other but capping total moves, so what we have left is not chess anymore, and the things that made chess good are now deprecated and useless."Take me down to the Paradise City where the grass is green and the Swans win pretty."Comment
Comment