AFL sets interchange cap

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MightyBloods
    Regular in the Side
    • Feb 2012
    • 532

    #16
    Does the cap come in the new membership packs?

    Comment

    • chalbilto
      Senior Player
      • Oct 2007
      • 1139

      #17
      I wouldn't mind the rotation cap if it was in place with 4 on the bench and no sub.

      Comment

      • Bloody Hell
        Senior Player
        • Oct 2006
        • 3085

        #18
        Great!

        ...no wait, I mean the opposite.

        I can't see any way this improves the game. Sure it will open it up more, but it's open enough. As noted the endurance player will get places ahead of speed players, even more so than at the moment. No more burning off opponents or bursting from pack ball in hand.
        The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

        Comment

        • aardvark
          Veterans List
          • Mar 2010
          • 5685

          #19
          Originally posted by chalbilto
          I wouldn't mind the rotation cap
          Is that the one with the propeller on top?

          Comment

          • stellation
            scott names the planets
            • Sep 2003
            • 9716

            #20
            You can just hear the collective shuffle of the feet of potential converts the first time this comes in during a Suns or Giants game. "You can'd do what now? I give up!"
            I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
            We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

            Comment

            • Swansongster
              Senior Player
              • Sep 2008
              • 1264

              #21
              Originally posted by aardvark
              Is that the one with the propeller on top?
              No. It is the one you wear backwards (for Gen Ys).

              Comment

              • Mel_C
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4470

                #22
                Originally posted by ugg
                Considering we've are one of the sides that utilise the interchange the most over the past decade or so, how does this impact on our game style, our structures and personnel going forward?
                A month or so back there was an article in one of the papers with the interchange averages for each team this year and surprisingly we were at the bottom with around 120 from memory. It could be due to the injuries that we have had this year?

                Yesterday on AFL 360 they showed the interchange averages over the last 10 years and can you believe in 2005 the AFL average was in the 30s!!

                Comment

                • mcs
                  Travelling Swannie!!
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 8126

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Mel_C
                  A month or so back there was an article in one of the papers with the interchange averages for each team this year and surprisingly we were at the bottom with around 120 from memory. It could be due to the injuries that we have had this year?

                  Yesterday on AFL 360 they showed the interchange averages over the last 10 years and can you believe in 2005 the AFL average was in the 30s!!
                  Funny how much the game changes and how quickly. But the AFL is hastening the constant changing by changing rules constantly when there isn't the need to do so.
                  "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                  Comment

                  • alt_mattr
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 169

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Mel_C
                    Yesterday on AFL 360 they showed the interchange averages over the last 10 years and can you believe in 2005 the AFL average was in the 30s!!
                    The AFL is stacked with former players and former coaches so they constantly think things should go back to the way they were. Why should we think 30 is better than 130? Can't stand this pointless tinkering. It won't achieve what they want either, just like the sub didn't achieve what they wanted. They are just stacking up half-baked ideas on top of each other.

                    Comment

                    • The Big Cat
                      On the veteran's list
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 2310

                      #25
                      Should go back to 19th and 20th men who permanently replace a player who comes off. Means the best players are always on the field and tests out the real endurance of players. Maybe we'd get back to some blokes playing in a position and get rid of this eyesore of thirty six blokes around the ball. People criticised the flood in the back line. The forward press is worse since the ball is trapped in the forward line and the outriders just send it back in if it ever is cleared. Supporters of the constant rotations say that the game has evolved to get rid of the flood. No it hasn't! The flood has just moved up the other end.
                      Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        #26
                        if forwards aren't ineterchanged after every goal that will reduce the number somewhat.

                        Comment

                        • bodgie
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 500

                          #27
                          Originally posted by The Big Cat
                          Should go back to 19th and 20th men who permanently replace a player who comes off. Means the best players are always on the field and tests out the real endurance of players. Maybe we'd get back to some blokes playing in a position and get rid of this eyesore of thirty six blokes around the ball. People criticised the flood in the back line. The forward press is worse since the ball is trapped in the forward line and the outriders just send it back in if it ever is cleared. Supporters of the constant rotations say that the game has evolved to get rid of the flood. No it hasn't! The flood has just moved up the other end.
                          Or just 16 on the field (get rid of a few crowding mids who all look and play like each other) and keep 4 on the bench with unlimited rotation

                          Comment

                          • Bloodthirsty
                            On the Rookie List
                            • May 2013
                            • 607

                            #28
                            Yep, another stupid, unnecessary, complex rule to adjust to for another year, that the players hate, the viewers hate. That's like making two geniuses play chess against each other but capping total moves, so what we have left is not chess anymore, and the things that made chess good are now deprecated and useless.
                            "Take me down to the Paradise City where the grass is green and the Swans win pretty."

                            Comment

                            Working...