Tweet
just saw today that jharal yow yeh (broncos player, for those that dont know) has retired at just 24. he was a great young player (couple of origin and australia games) that was struck down by a series of injuries (ankle i think??) and his body just hasnt been able to cope. this is the stuff u hate seeing in any sport, no matter what team u follow. lets pray that alex pulls through the tough times he has to go through all over again, and realises his full potential as a sportsman.
-
-
I see that reports are now confirming AJ has re-injured the reco knee not the other good knee as some have reported. LARS restring and he'll be back playing mid year, plenty of time for our 2014 finals triumphs :-)Comment
-
In case anyone isn't already feeling @@@@ty enough about the AJ situation, check out the reserves match highlights up on the Swans' site. It's a very short video, which is an indictment on how the team performed, but the first play on show will make you weep.Comment
-
The article I read said traditional. They would be absolutely stupid to even consider LARS with AJ. Got to do a traditional one and hope it holds this time. I expect we won't see him back on the park till probably mid 2015, as they will take a lot of time to make sure they get it exactly right - as another injury like that will surely be the end of him as an afl footballer
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Sorry, why would they be stupid to go LARS? I'm not an expert some I'm genuinely in the dark. Just because like a few of our players, he's had a traditional fail. It also came with an infection (unlucky). Curious because it seems to me they were close the first time, probably erred on the side of caution? So went traditional...
If traditional is the best option (but also can fail) and AJ is young and has time on his side, why did we go with the "riskier" option of LARS the second time, and put forward a case to him for LARS the first time?
cheers for your reply.Comment
-
My mistake- I thought it was LARS first time around, but as Triple B pointed out, it was traditional, then hybrid LARS.
Stupid was probably the wrong word to use to describe doing another LARS - high-risk is probably a better description of what a LARS would be in my opinion. But with it being a traditional failing the first time round, then its probably just as high-risk. It's clear that the club aren't going to try and rush his recovery, so it would make sense to take the safest option to try and ensure the best result, which would be a traditional one I'd expect.Last edited by mcs; 21 March 2014, 08:28 AM."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Ok cheers for clearing that up.
Im sure the club will do whats right. I think the time is right now, that another one could be a career ender. So reset, take our time and push for a solid 12-18month recovery which will have him @ 23 as fit and ready to take his chance with a hopeful 10 year career ahead of him.Comment
-
There aren't any statistics on failure rates of the wide varieties of ACL reconstruction types, and there is nothing to say that LARS is any more risky than traditional, except that Doc Larkins seems to think so. The surgical methods vary as much as the materials used. Without knowing the specifics, it would seem that if AJ had an infection it had more to do with causes not related to the material used as infections are not normal regardless of the type of surgery. So we shouldn't prejudge what future treatment is best. If he has a LARS, then perhaps he can return in round 1 next year. If he has a traditional, he will likely miss most or all of next year as well.Comment
-
Can we change the thread title?
New interview. leaning towards hybrid lars again, still undecided. Will choose after knee settles down from cleanup and a trip to the US.
SwansTV: Alex Johnson injury update - sydneyswans.com.auComment
-
As someone whose own footy career was over before it began due to illness, I greatly admire Alex's resilience and determination to get back on the paddock. Let us hope it's all clear sailing for the lad from here on in. What I still don't understand is why was he permitted to play before his infected knee had cleared up?
Comment
-
Is it possible to at least put a date on this thread title? Every time I see it my heart sinks thinking he's done it AGAIN.He ate more cheese, than time allowedComment
Comment