Pavlich vs Riewoldt

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bleed Red Blood
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2003
    • 2057

    Pavlich vs Riewoldt

    Pavlich was taken at no4 in the 99 draft and has played 84 games, while Riewoldnt was taken at no 1 in the 2000 draft and has played 50 games.

    Who would you like on our team?

    Personally I would like Pavlich at the moment.
    8
    Pav
    0%
    5
    Riewoldt
    0%
    3
  • robbieando
    The King
    • Jan 2003
    • 2750

    #2
    Re: Pavlich vs Riewoldt

    Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
    Personally I would like Pavlich at the moment.
    Same here
    Once was, now elsewhere

    Comment

    • Mike_B
      Peyow Peyow
      • Jan 2003
      • 6267

      #3
      Pavlich for me as well...IMHO provides more options around the field than Riewoldt does at present....not to say I wouldn't take Nick if he was available though!

      I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

      If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

      Comment

      • Destructive
        Football Terrorist
        • Jan 2003
        • 976

        #4
        Pavlich.
        The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
        Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
        238 AFL Games.

        Comment

        • anne
          Regular in the Side
          • Sep 2003
          • 719

          #5
          If we had Pavlich we would win a flag.
          ---------||--ANNE--||----------

          Comment

          • lizz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16786

            #6
            Goodes

            Seriously, the value in players who are as tall, mobile and talented as these three is their ability to play all over the ground - almost improvising their position. But teams do need some structure and you can't have 18 playing where they feel like it. Maybe you can't have two.

            Pavlich is a very good player but how would adding him into the team affect Goodes ideal role. Would we be that much better off with two of them than we are with one.

            I'm not suggesting that we wouldn't want either of these, nor that the Swans wouldn't be a better team with them in. But I don't think the improvement would be clear cut.

            Comment

            • NMWBloods
              Taking Refuge!!
              • Jan 2003
              • 15819

              #7
              A tall, athletic, rebounding, key-position backman would add an awful lot to our team!
              Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

              "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

              Comment

              Working...