Review - the Super Group

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • giant
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2005
    • 4731

    Review - the Super Group

    No, not LRT-Walsh-Nankervis-Membrey, the other Super Group. How did they go?

    My thoughts:
    - KT was fantastic against an under-sized defence, but will be shattered if he's our only "pack target" down there - perhaps partly a role for Myke when he returns? (though it looks like they want the ruckman on the pine when he's not rucking)
    - Buddy look like a man released on Friday - no longer the only show in town and loving it. Still went to him too often and when he had too many defenders on him, but against a team other than the Hawks he'll kick a million goals on that form.
    - Goodes struggled the most - seemed to be grappling with what his role was, and maybe that's because no one quite knows yet. What he did do was often pretty damn good tho!
    - In some ways Sammy was the most impressive. Other than centre bounces, his ruck work looked quite sharp and he looked well up & about (certainly compared to the week before!). Almost held a number of great grabs - may yet be the cream of the crop!

    How did others rate them?
  • jetts32
    On the Rookie List
    • Oct 2012
    • 200

    #2
    I actually like KT as the option for pack mark; he's obviously an elite contested mark and not the greatest speed so if we can't hit up Buddy, Reid or Goodes on the lead, that's a good way to go!
    Reid is an great at getting his hands on it in a contested situation. He'll get better with experience though.

    Goodes will take time with such a long time out but if he can stay healthy he'll be so important all around the ground, he seems to be brilliant every time he gets the ball.

    Buddy is Buddy - he'll win us games like that, or he'll be completely shut off defensively. Which allows the other 3 to be open (which is a win either way, because the other 3 are still very, very dangerous) buddy has also got better at contested marks which was a week point at Hawthorn!

    Reid was very impressive; showed good signs in ruck, took a couple of good marks down in defence and he'll get better up forward with experience - Reidy is very important to us!

    Love having these guys in one team, very hard to match up on. They all move very well for their size, even Tippet for his size I reckon could turn a lot of ruckman around.

    Hopefully they all stay healthy!

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16760

      #3
      As a first outing it was a pretty reasonable effort. I was worried they would be totally un-cohesive first up but they all seemed to understand their roles and there wasn't too much getting in each others' way. We did butcher some chances by either looking for Buddy when a shot by a midfielder would have been a better option, or by just general indecisiveness.

      It needs to get better but I am confident it will, even if there are weeks in the short term when it works less effectively than on Friday.

      Comment

      • Ludwig
        Veterans List
        • Apr 2007
        • 9359

        #4
        No need to comment individually on the big 4, because they're all very good, and some even great. You can see from the performance the incredible potential of Tippett and Buddy working in tandem. When they are on, they are the best at their positions. Tippett is a monster forward that kicks better than Cloke. And Buddy is ................... well, ...... Buddy. He's unique. There's never been another one quite like him. I wouldn't say he's better that Goodes, but definitely in the same class. Players like Adam and Buddy don't play a position, they create their own position.

        Comment

        • CureTheSane
          Carpe Noctem
          • Jan 2003
          • 5032

          #5
          I was pretty damn excited at the first quarter.
          However, there was a huge element of that coming from the midfield.
          Still if you forget about Buddy's behinds, we're looking a bit ominous.

          Last time Goodes came back it took a long time for him to really get going. Not saying that will be the same again, but it could be a slower road than we would hope for.
          With Pyke back, and the 4 or 5 talls rotating through the forward line, it will possibly create a very hard forward structure to effectively match up.
          The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

          Comment

          • dimelb
            pr. dim-melb; m not f
            • Jun 2003
            • 6889

            #6
            On ch 7's Game Day Andrew Welsh was commenting on our game and said the Swans forward line could be the best ever.
            He also said Hannebery is back - very observant.
            He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

            Comment

            • Doctor
              Bay 29
              • Sep 2003
              • 2757

              #7
              Any big 4 or similar needs a moniker of sorts. The simplest way is to use initials and then manipulate them until you get something you like. To that end, ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Sydney STAB!!

              (That's Sam, Tippett, Adam, Buddy)
              Today's a draft of your epitaph

              Comment

              • Bloody Hell
                Senior Player
                • Oct 2006
                • 3085

                #8
                Originally posted by liz
                As a first outing it was a pretty reasonable effort. I was worried they would be totally un-cohesive first up but they all seemed to understand their roles and there wasn't too much getting in each others' way. We did butcher some chances by either looking for Buddy when a shot by a midfielder would have been a better option, or by just general indecisiveness.

                It needs to get better but I am confident it will, even if there are weeks in the short term when it works less effectively than on Friday.
                There was alot of looking to hit up a man on the lead from people running INSIDE 50. Have a shot FFS!
                The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                Comment

                • dimelb
                  pr. dim-melb; m not f
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 6889

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Doctor
                  Any big 4 or similar needs a moniker of sorts. The simplest way is to use initials and then manipulate them until you get something you like. To that end, ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Sydney STAB!!

                  (That's Sam, Tippett, Adam, Buddy)
                  That's pretty good!
                  Just as well you didn't use all first names ...
                  He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                  Comment

                  • aardvark
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5685

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dimelb
                    That's pretty good!
                    Just as well you didn't use all first names ...
                    Shhhh don't let the Melbourne Media get a hold of that one, they'd have a field day!

                    Comment

                    • ScottH
                      It's Goodes to cheer!!
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 23665

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Doctor
                      Any big 4 or similar needs a moniker of sorts. The simplest way is to use initials and then manipulate them until you get something you like. To that end, ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Sydney STAB!!

                      (That's Sam, Tippett, Adam, Buddy)
                      BATS??

                      Or SKAB

                      Comment

                      • ernie koala
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2007
                        • 3251

                        #12
                        Or.... BASK in the Bondi sun.
                        Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                        Comment

                        • ScottH
                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 23665

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ernie koala
                          Or.... BASK in the Bondi sun.
                          And when they start to fail, you can add an ET to it.

                          Comment

                          • Syd Swan
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 140

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ScottH
                            And when they start to fail, you can add an ET to it.
                            FART (Franklin, Adam, Reid & Tippet)

                            Comment

                            • Untamed Snark
                              Senior Player
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 1375

                              #15
                              FAST
                              Franklin, Adam, Sammy, Tippett
                              Chillin' with the strange Quarks

                              Comment

                              Working...