Confused by this article on Luke Parker

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neilfws
    Senior Player
    • Aug 2009
    • 1834

    Confused by this article on Luke Parker

    Love Parker's game this season and good to see him in the media...but...

    Sydney forward Luke Parker enjoys a giant season

    First, sure he's played more forward this year, but "Sydney forward"? Still a midfielder, surely.

    Second, why "a giant season"? Are they referring to our talls? Surely they haven't made the mistake of... I note they write "Sydney" throughout, never "the Swans".

    No name attached to this generic AAP article. Seems like it was thrown together by someone who doesn't know much, using some quotes.
  • swansrob
    Senior Player
    • May 2009
    • 1265

    #2
    Maybe the article's been edited, but in the fourth paragraph he referred to as a "tenacious midfielder/small forward" and the Swans are name-checked.

    Comment

    • stellation
      scott names the planets
      • Sep 2003
      • 9723

      #3
      I agree it's not the greatest bit of writing, but to fair it does refer to him as a midfielder in the article.
      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

      Comment

      • GongSwan
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2009
        • 1362

        #4
        Thrown together from his presser, can't expect too much from hte Melbourne media about Swans
        You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

        Comment

        • neilfws
          Senior Player
          • Aug 2009
          • 1834

          #5
          Originally posted by swansrob
          Maybe the article's been edited, but in the fourth paragraph he referred to as a "tenacious midfielder/small forward" and the Swans are name-checked.
          Originally posted by stellation
          I agree it's not the greatest bit of writing, but to fair it does refer to him as a midfielder in the article.
          Both correct. I guess it's a case of bad headline, slightly better main text.

          Comment

          Working...