Changes for Rnd 17 V West Coast

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wolftone57
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2008
    • 5857

    #91
    Originally posted by chalbilto
    I would be rapt if Shaw was the sub.

    +2

    Comment

    • wolftone57
      Veterans List
      • Aug 2008
      • 5857

      #92
      Originally posted by aguy
      I agree. After watching that interview I think heeney will start. I also think shaw should start ( despite me thinking he is next to be dropped). I say that because I think ted often leads the back 6 on field and we need shaws experience to play that on field leadership role If it's not shaw then it would fall to Grundy and laidler and I'm not sure that either is ideal for that. McVeigh should play across half back but he is often further upfield so also not suited to that defenders marshalling role.

      So I ( kinda reluctantly) think that jones should be the sub for this one. I do however think (injuries aside) that we shouldn't wait till deep in the final qtr to make the sub. I would sub jones on for shaw mid third quarter
      Why would it fall to Grundy or Laidler? Surely smithy is a better leader than all of those including Rhyce. Reg is not the leader type but is playing well at mo. We need to stop that HB backward the defenders do. It is part of a badly flawed game plan.

      Comment

      • wolftone57
        Veterans List
        • Aug 2008
        • 5857

        #93
        Originally posted by dimelb
        I imagine Heeney will be the sub and Xav will be on for the full game (with visits to the bench). Good luck to them both and whatever happens on Sunday I think they're both part of our future.
        I doubt the logic of Heeney being Sub. He is far too dangerous to be sub. By the interview in Swans site he will be playing forward. Like to see him in the mids a bit.

        SwansTV - Heeney interview July 24, 2015 - sydneyswans.com.au

        Comment

        • aguy
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2014
          • 1324

          #94
          Originally posted by wolftone57
          Why would it fall to Grundy or Laidler? Surely smithy is a better leader than all of those including Rhyce. Reg is not the leader type but is playing well at mo. We need to stop that HB backward the defenders do. It is part of a badly flawed game plan.
          Yes smith had slipped my mind. My bad

          Comment

          • Triple B
            Formerly 'BBB'
            • Feb 2003
            • 6999

            #95
            Smith is in such terrible form I'd prefer he concentrates on getting his own @@@@ together...
            Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

            Comment

            • i'm-uninformed2
              Reefer Madness
              • Oct 2003
              • 4653

              #96
              Thank god for Bachar Houli, though someone should really check his betting account with that kick in
              'Delicious' is a fun word to say

              Comment

              • Flying South
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2013
                • 585

                #97
                Originally posted by Scottee
                Xav in the side means that Reid can go forward and enforce our height advantage in the forward line. If the mids can get on top we might have half a chance
                IMO one of our main problems is we don't have a balanced structure in our forward line. Playing Franklin, Nankervis, Goodes and Reid in our forward line is just way too tall. There is no defensive pressure. Sides have been able to rebound out our F50 way too easily. Without Rohan, Jetta needs to play a HF role along with Heeney crumbing. Need a balance of talls and smalls.

                Comment

                • dimelb
                  pr. dim-melb; m not f
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 6889

                  #98
                  Reid is listed at CHB.
                  He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                  Comment

                  • crackedactor
                    Regular in the Side
                    • May 2012
                    • 919

                    #99
                    MUST BE IN

                    Originally posted by wolftone57
                    I doubt the logic of Heeney being Sub. He is far too dangerous to be sub. By the interview in Swans site he will be playing forward. Like to see him in the mids a bit.

                    SwansTV - Heeney interview July 24, 2015 - sydneyswans.com.au
                    Heeney Has to be in.. It may be the only good thing in the game to watch.. if last week is any indication.Just Hoping we get within 5 goals. Love Heeney, really think he will be a superstar of the future.

                    Comment

                    • Scottee
                      Senior Player
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 1585

                      I would have thought that Lloyd is the obvious sub. He has done it before and had impact, his form and confidence are down. Sub might be just the role for him this week.
                      We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

                      Comment

                      • Bloodthirsty
                        On the Rookie List
                        • May 2013
                        • 607

                        Swans could get their season looking better with a win - will make a huge difference if we win. However, the inevitability of Freo in Perth or Hawks on MCG come finals time is all but a harbinger of doom.
                        "Take me down to the Paradise City where the grass is green and the Swans win pretty."

                        Comment

                        • annew
                          Senior Player
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 2164

                          Originally posted by Bloodthirsty
                          Swans could get their season looking better with a win - will make a huge difference if we win. However, the inevitability of Freo in Perth or Hawks on MCG come finals time is all but a harbinger of doom.
                          We beat Hawks at MCG earlier this year and nearly beat Freo - gotta be optimistic

                          Comment

                          • cherub
                            Warming the Bench
                            • May 2010
                            • 239

                            One week at a time. mantra for players, wise for fans. One injury to a key player and every side is vulnerable. Even Hawthorn. ( Though they might need two injuries).

                            Comment

                            • Bloodthirsty
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2013
                              • 607

                              I know I'm sorry I didn't mean to start this nice day off with negativity, but there is just so much talent at the Swans that comes around once every one or two decades and the thought of not capitalising with another flag is the key driver for concern. Win over Wet Coke will be huge, and very possible.
                              "Take me down to the Paradise City where the grass is green and the Swans win pretty."

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16778

                                Originally posted by Bloodthirsty
                                I know I'm sorry I didn't mean to start this nice day off with negativity, but there is just so much talent at the Swans that comes around once every one or two decades and the thought of not capitalising with another flag is the key driver for concern. Win over Wet Coke will be huge, and very possible.
                                It's possible but it's going to take one hell of a performance. We go into this game with four players having played fewer than 10 games. Indeed, three of them have played fewer than 10 in aggregate.

                                The timing of Tippett's injury is particularly unfortunate. It means the team has no choice but to go up against NicNat with two rucks with very little mobility - Pyke by dint of not being injury free.

                                Comment

                                Working...