New AFL Rules and Interpretations for 2016 Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barry
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 8499

    #46
    I see no reason to add new rules. Just inforce existing ones.

    Comment

    • Mug Punter
      On the Rookie List
      • Nov 2009
      • 3325

      #47
      Originally posted by barry
      I see no reason to add new rules. Just inforce existing ones.
      You enjoy the current blocking and general chaos at the ruck contest that sees ruckmen consistently being interfered with then barry?

      Comment

      • CureTheSane
        Carpe Noctem
        • Jan 2003
        • 5032

        #48
        Originally posted by Bloods05
        How did I know you'd be a fan of Family Guy? Uncanny!
        Giggity.
        The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

        Comment

        • barry
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 8499

          #49
          Originally posted by Mug Punter
          You enjoy the current blocking and general chaos at the ruck contest that sees ruckmen consistently being interfered with then barry?
          Doesnt bother me.

          Comment

          • Mug Punter
            On the Rookie List
            • Nov 2009
            • 3325

            #50
            Originally posted by barry
            Doesnt bother me.
            Fair enough, and it probably doesn't massively disadvantage the swans either. I guess I am just old fashioned and think back to when rucks were a pure one on one contest.

            Comment

            • Conor_Dillon
              On the Rookie List
              • Jun 2013
              • 1224

              #51
              If the third-man up is going to help clear congestion and make for more open footy then I'm all for it.
              Twitter @cmdil
              Instagram @conordillon

              Comment

              • Mel_C
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4470

                #52
                Originally posted by Conor_Dillon
                If the third-man up is going to help clear congestion and make for more open footy then I'm all for it.
                Yeah that's fine as long as the opposition ruckman isn't penalised for "blocking" the proper ruckman. This happened to us a number of times last year.

                Comment

                • cos789
                  Warming the Bench
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 222

                  #53
                  Originally posted by barry
                  I see no reason to add new rules. Just inforce existing ones.
                  How about removing laws. (They're not rules) One law not two.
                  Every stoppage should mimic the centre bouncedown i.e. exclusion zone until ball leaves umpire's hands.
                  Deliberate out - one law, remove reference to "pressure"
                  Kicked out - then kick it in - one law, remove reference to kick-in.
                  While we're at it, remove a multitude of laws and have kick-in as free kick 15m out.
                  give it to the game

                  Comment

                  • barry
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 8499

                    #54
                    Originally posted by cos789
                    How about removing laws. (They're not rules)
                    Its not called Aussie Laws

                    Comment

                    • cos789
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 222

                      #55
                      Originally posted by barry
                      Its not called Aussie Laws
                      Really Barry, is that the best you can do?
                      The game is formally called Australian Football and is governed by the "Laws of the game".
                      give it to the game

                      Comment

                      • Mug Punter
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 3325

                        #56
                        Originally posted by cos789
                        Really Barry, is that the best you can do?
                        The game is formally called Australian Football and is governed by the "Laws of the game".
                        Humour is not barry's strong point....

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #57
                          Are you really trying to tell me the game called "aussie rules" has no "rules"?

                          Comment

                          • Meg
                            Go Swannies!
                            Site Admin
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 4828

                            #58
                            Interesting comments in the attached article from AFL website re third man up in ruck contests.

                            I am a bit confused by this tactic (which became pretty common last year). Can someone clarify for me the rules around third-man-up situations. Am I right to think that an opposition player is not allowed to block the 'designated' ruckman, but can block an opposition player attempting to jump over the top ('the third man up')?

                            And in the case of Sandilands suspension this week, Sandilands was attempting to block Griffiths (who would have been the third man up) which was in itself a legitimate act - but he bumped Griffith high in the head which was the reason for the suspension? (Hard for Sandilands NOT to hit any player in the head - he should simply never attempt to bump).

                            Umpires would be happy to ban third-man up rucks, says Wayne Campbell - AFL.com.au

                            Comment

                            • Meg
                              Go Swannies!
                              Site Admin
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 4828

                              #59
                              Originally posted by cos789
                              The game is formally called Australian Football and is governed by the "Laws of the game".
                              Cos is correct that what most of us think of as 'rules' are formally known as 'laws' - the full title being 'Laws of Australian Football'.

                              I was aware of that in creating this thread but virtually everyone talks about the 'laws' as 'rules' so that's what I called this discussion. Even the AFL itself often refers to 'rules' on its website when technically they mean 'laws'. For example, the article setting out the changes for this year started off referring to a 'law' and then later on referred to a 'rule'.

                              On the other hand, what are formally 'AFL Game Rules' are what most of us would think of as regulations. For example as below on use of the stretcher.

                              It's all a bit confusing!


                              "7.3USE OF STRETCHER
                              7.3.1Health and Safety of Player
                              Any Player who is injured during a Match and who, in the opinion of a doctor, trainer or Official, requires the assistance of a stretcher, shall be attended by the Team?s training staff and a stretcher as soon as possible so as to ensure the health and safety of the Player."

                              Comment

                              • Mel_C
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 4470

                                #60
                                I saw another ridiculous interpretation of the deliberate out of bounds rule in the Melbourne v Port game. The ball was bouncing towards the boundary line and the players were running full speed towards the ball. The Melbourne player took possession of the ball as he got to the boundary line and obviously momentum took him over the line. The umpire penalised him!! Even the commentators couldn't believe it was paid.

                                Comment

                                Working...