2015 Vs 2016
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
What was our percentage last year? I think a couple of uncharacteristic big wins early on helped set the tone.
Also, I feel like this year is the first time in years that we've demonstrated that we have a plan to beat the Hawks. Our recent victories have felt very much like flukes that relied on them having key outs. This year is different and it gives me hope.
I am still not overconfident about this year though. The kids will find it tough in finals and a few injuries could weaken us drastically.
Still, so far so good and the future does look bright.Comment
-
What was our percentage last year? I think a couple of uncharacteristic big wins early on helped set the tone.
Also, I feel like this year is the first time in years that we've demonstrated that we have a plan to beat the Hawks. Our recent victories have felt very much like flukes that relied on them having key outs. This year is different and it gives me hope.
I am still not overconfident about this year though. The kids will find it tough in finals and a few injuries could weaken us drastically.
Still, so far so good and the future does look bright.Comment
-
Mean margin this year is 32.27 points, versus 25.09 for first 11 rounds last year.Comment
-
For mine, a major influence on the game style has been the exit of Jetta. We would often try to play through him as a playmaker, and required him to put the jets on, but he would often double back and slow the progression up. He became a very lateral player in the last two seasons with the Swans. Lloyd has directly taken his role, and he is playing more run and gun.
Two other things:
- We seem to have really worked on our "handles". We don't need a lace out handball these days, it can be to the toes, but Kennedy (unbelievable in this facet), Mitchell, Parker, and Hannebery seem to be able to snatch it one grab. So instead of giving the opposition the opportunity to close us down, where other teams have a little fumble, the play flows on.
- Breaking tackles to break the lines: that is, we seem to be able to shake off the first tackler a lot more than other teams, and it instantly creates an overlap. With quick ball movement by hand, it creates a free runner, and the forwards have been given excellent service this year as a result of the initial wiggle of the hips.
And thirdly, long down the line is no longer the go-to play.. #thankfulC'mon Chels!Comment
-
The differences; less injuries, improvement of less experienced players and young players who have been able to slot straight in.Comment
-
Biggest difference is expectations for mine, followed by not dealing with the booing every week.
Still not expecting us to really challenge at the pointy end, but we've done well so far.He ate more cheese, than time allowedComment
-
For mine, a major influence on the game style has been the exit of Jetta. We would often try to play through him as a playmaker, and required him to put the jets on, but he would often double back and slow the progression up. He became a very lateral player in the last two seasons with the Swans. Lloyd has directly taken his role, and he is playing more run and gun.
Two other things:
- We seem to have really worked on our "handles". We don't need a lace out handball these days, it can be to the toes, but Kennedy (unbelievable in this facet), Mitchell, Parker, and Hannebery seem to be able to snatch it one grab. So instead of giving the opposition the opportunity to close us down, where other teams have a little fumble, the play flows on.
- Breaking tackles to break the lines: that is, we seem to be able to shake off the first tackler a lot more than other teams, and it instantly creates an overlap. With quick ball movement by hand, it creates a free runner, and the forwards have been given excellent service this year as a result of the initial wiggle of the hips.
And thirdly, long down the line is no longer the go-to play.. #thankful
And good point about the ability of many of our players to break tackles. If the first player misses, then somebody has to leave their man and this creates another immediate option. Possibly a benefit of having a midfield core that are largely in their prime playing years.Comment
-
Someone mentioned the dark days of the early 90s, I remember going to a Thursday training session at the SCG in about 1993 and I was the ONLY supporter there. Players looked at me as they jogged around the oval as if I was an oddity.
Remember players breaking from training routines to do boxing with some old boxer, Simon Garlick is the player I remember doing it.
Yes, dark days indeed :-( But this year is looking :-) Just need to put away GWS this week.Comment
-
As was said booing was hard for the whole team but also:
Jetta and Towers were dead weight
Losing Buddy was enough but then to lose Parker and Jack on top was just too much.
Having said that, still should have beaten Freo but then would have been smashed by Hawthorn.Comment
-
Comment
-
C'mon Chels!Comment
Comment