Changes for Rnd.13 V Melbourne.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    #46
    Originally posted by aardvark
    I hate to say it but wouldn't we be better off with Towers as back up ruck than Nankervis if it's going to be a quagmire again?
    Agree and it wouldn't be a shock to me at all...
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

    Comment

    • The Big Cat
      On the veteran's list
      • Apr 2006
      • 2356

      #47
      On a different but encouraging note, The Age is reporting Mitchell will sign next week
      Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

      Comment

      • Markus26
        On the Rookie List
        • Apr 2015
        • 147

        #48
        Originally posted by The Big Cat
        On a different but encouraging note, The Age is reporting Mitchell will sign next week
        That would be fantastic! TM is turning into a consistent gun. Would love to have him in the red and white for years to come.

        Comment

        • Mug Punter
          On the Rookie List
          • Nov 2009
          • 3325

          #49
          Originally posted by aardvark
          I hate to say it but wouldn't we be better off with Towers as back up ruck than Nankervis if it's going to be a quagmire again?
          I'd like to see that.

          - - - Updated - - -

          Originally posted by The Big Cat
          On a different but encouraging note, The Age is reporting Mitchell will sign next week
          And I'd like to see that too. Do the deed Tom

          Comment

          • caj23
            Senior Player
            • Aug 2003
            • 2462

            #50
            Originally posted by aardvark
            I hate to say it but wouldn't we be better off with Towers as back up ruck than Nankervis if it's going to be a quagmire again?
            Yes definitely an option, although there is a trade off. Additional run vs what will probably be a lot of ball ups due to the conditions.

            A shame Reid injured himself as I think they would have used him as 2nd ruck

            Comment

            • Scottee
              Senior Player
              • Aug 2003
              • 1585

              #51
              I think its going to be harder to flood the backline without Swampy Marsh.
              We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

              Comment

              • Doctor
                Bay 29
                • Sep 2003
                • 2757

                #52
                Originally posted by Scottee
                I think its going to be harder to flood the backline without Swampy Marsh.
                I see what you did there! :-)
                Today's a draft of your epitaph

                Comment

                • longmile
                  Crumber
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 3366

                  #53
                  IN
                  Aliir Aliir, George Hewett, Tyrone Leonardis, Sam Naismith, Toby Nankervis, Dean Towers

                  OUT
                  Harry Cunningham (Omitted), Harrison Marsh (Hamstring), Kurt Tippett (Hamstring)
                  Last edited by longmile; 16 June 2016, 06:35 PM.

                  Comment

                  • longmile
                    Crumber
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 3366

                    #54
                    Brave but the right choice with Cunningham imo, he has looked sub-par this year

                    Also no Ted Richards, he must be getting a run in the reserves to get some match fitness

                    I'd imagine Aliir Aliir will come in with Hewett and one of Naismith and Nankervis
                    Leaning towards Naismith atm

                    Comment

                    • dejavoodoo44
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 8637

                      #55
                      Originally posted by longmile
                      Brave but the right choice with Cunningham imo, he has looked sub-par this year

                      Also no Ted Richards, he must be getting a run in the reserves to get some match fitness

                      I'd imagine Aliir Aliir will come in with Hewett and one of Naismith and Nankervis
                      Leaning towards Naismith atm
                      Yes, I think that I'd like to see how Naismith goes. Though I suspect that since they've also included Nankervis, then the selectors are still undecided as to who comes in for Tippett and what role Sinclair will play. Of course, there's another possibility, which is: Aliir in for Tippett and Towers in for Marsh. But I do hope that they don't go down that path.
                      In regards to Cunningham, I've always seen him as a role player, rather than a future star, and he often plays his role well. But last week, his role was probably to shut down some of the run of the GWS half backline. Since that didn't happen, it's off to the NEAFL this week.

                      Comment

                      • Ludwig
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 9359

                        #56
                        Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                        Yes, I think that I'd like to see how Naismith goes. Though I suspect that since they've also included Nankervis, then the selectors are still undecided as to who comes in for Tippett and what role Sinclair will play. Of course, there's another possibility, which is: Aliir in for Tippett and Towers in for Marsh. But I do hope that they don't go down that path.
                        In regards to Cunningham, I've always seen him as a role player, rather than a future star, and he often plays his role well. But last week, his role was probably to shut down some of the run of the GWS half backline. Since that didn't happen, it's off to the NEAFL this week.
                        Naismith seems the logical choice as he's the better physical matchup for Max Gawn, who will be too tall for both Nanka and Sinclair and too agile for Nanka. Naismith would do most of the ruck work and Sinclair would do his usual job at forward and relief ruckman.

                        I've also been disappointed with Cunningham's season. He's quick and has good skills. His tackling has improved this year. But I can't understand why he's not getting more of the ball. I think one of Cunningham, McGlynn or McVeigh needed to get dropped and Harry is easiest one to make the call on. With wet conditions forecast, it's better to go with the more experienced players.

                        I'm hoping Hewett, Naismith and Aliir are the ones that play.

                        Hewett missed 2 games this year and we lost them both.

                        Comment

                        • dejavoodoo44
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 8637

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Ludwig
                          Naismith seems the logical choice as he's the better physical matchup for Max Gawn, who will be too tall for both Nanka and Sinclair and too agile for Nanka. Naismith would do most of the ruck work and Sinclair would do his usual job at forward and relief ruckman.

                          I've also been disappointed with Cunningham's season. He's quick and has good skills. His tackling has improved this year. But I can't understand why he's not getting more of the ball. I think one of Cunningham, McGlynn or McVeigh needed to get dropped and Harry is easiest one to make the call on. With wet conditions forecast, it's better to go with the more experienced players.

                          I'm hoping Hewett, Naismith and Aliir are the ones that play.

                          Hewett missed 2 games this year and we lost them both.
                          Yes, Hewett, Naismith and Aliir seem the logical choices, but I've been foiled by logic before.

                          Comment

                          • 707
                            Veterans List
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6204

                            #58
                            So all you guys are cutting Lloyd from the bench then?

                            Hewett will definitely start given his very good games so far, Lloyd won't be dropped so the only mystery remaining is Naismith or Naka for the second ruck duties.

                            Not surprised Cunningham given the chop, only wanting to make one voluntary change has saved McGlylnn who must be close to being dropped as well I'd reckon.

                            Comment

                            • longmile
                              Crumber
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 3366

                              #59
                              Originally posted by 707
                              Not surprised Cunningham given the chop, only wanting to make one voluntary change has saved McGlylnn who must be close to being dropped as well I'd reckon.
                              Probably waiting for Papley to return to match fitness

                              Comment

                              • dejavoodoo44
                                Veterans List
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 8637

                                #60
                                Originally posted by 707
                                So all you guys are cutting Lloyd from the bench then?

                                Hewett will definitely start given his very good games so far, Lloyd won't be dropped so the only mystery remaining is Naismith or Naka for the second ruck duties.

                                Not surprised Cunningham given the chop, only wanting to make one voluntary change has saved McGlylnn who must be close to being dropped as well I'd reckon.
                                Umm, no. In our scenario, the bench is Lloyd, Aliir, Hewett and Naismith. While the ones being removed from the provisional seven man bench are Towers, Nankervis and Leonardis.

                                Comment

                                Working...