-
My opinion is objective truth in its purest form -
Lisa's observations are on the money for this gameComment
-
SLIDING DOORS:
Even as I type, I realise this pointless, but humour me anyway. Imagine if Goodsey wasn't booed into retirement - his form at the end was still ok if you didn't want a match winner, just a handy contributor, who demanded a key defender. If he signed on for one more year, with the understanding he wouldn't likely play every week as the Club transitioned it's list. How handy might he be replacing Tippett as a tall forward to compliment Buddy? Pointless, I know. Was just musing.Comment
-
Season on the line now so there is no room for sentimentality but by the same token we can't unsettle the side by making too many changes. I Agee with what has been said and only Naismith has the height, leap and athleticism to go with Smith although this will only be his third game so that's a worry. Nankervis would have to be the one to make way because at least Sinclair has some value around the ground.
We must get Aliir into the side because Geelong are simply huge all over the ground, but the question is for whom. Laidlaw? That would possibly backfire given Laidlaw ' talent in the air.
Wracked my brain as to whom you replace and even thought that you could play him in the ruck instead of Naismith. Hmmmm
Sent from my SM-T805Y using TapatalkWe have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!Comment
-
I'm sticking to my earlier post - no change. If Tippett &/or Reid were fit, definitely in - but they are not.
This is a crunch game for us - which, unfortunately I think we'll lose. The only hope we have is a big-time/gutsy effort from all the players.
After this game, win or lose, re-assess their performance & act/axe accordingly, with the future in mind.Comment
-
IN : Papley
OUT : Towers... I can't get past his untimely duck.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
Completely agree. That Hawthorn game where he kicked 3 goals sealed the deal for me. A forward and only a forward. Since Towers has come into the team he has drifted alot to that spare man in defence role and become ineffectual. Due to team structures and balance, I don't believe you can play Towers and Rohan in the same team. Given a choice I would pick Rohan as he kicks more goals, applies more defensive pressure and seems to work well with Buddy.
Ins: Papley, Naismith, Allir
Outs: McGlynn, Nankervis, TowersComment
-
The ruck problem - can Sinclair and Nankervis compete / run with Smith, Rhys Stanley and Blicavs - I doubt it. If Naismith is more mobile than Nankervis why not give him a run.
A few on here have mentioned that McGlynn looks to be cooked - bring in Papley.
Heeny is not doing well as a midfielder so why not use him as the crumbing forward - working of Buddy. They seem to work well together.
Towers: I'd leave him in. Without Sam Reid we have no match up for Blicavs.
Defenders: if Laidler is not 100% he should be omitted. When fit, he's a pretty good player but he's ineffective if slightly off his game
Outs: McGlynn, Nankervis, Heeny
Ins: Papley, Naismith, Aliir
Mills or Jones into the midfield.
6 day turnaround, Geelong 2 weeks off, the game is at Geelong. I'm not confident about winning this game.Comment
-
-
Out: Dry weather
In: Wet weather
Simmonds Stadium has already advised patrons that the car parks at the ground will be closed on Friday night due to the anticipated inclement weather...Comment
-
That may actually be good news, as we have had plenty of practice (and success) in the wet this year.
I liked this, from Flying South, above:
Ins: Papley, Naismith, Allir
Outs: McGlynn, Nankervis, Towers
In my view, Towers might be able to play most teams and succeed but in the tough games against very good opponents, I don't trust him. I think of the 2014 grand final for example, and I imagine he would have in the band of players that were easily swept aside. We have lost of couple of games in due to a similar kind of softness this year, and we need to pick players who can be trusted to stand up. We know he isn't one. I think it's time to move on for good.
It feels like Ben McGlynn has hit that wall where he is perpetually a step behind, knows it, and is panicking about it, leading to bad decisions when he does get the ball. Again, we can't afford to carry players like that.Comment
-
I saw the post that Jordan Foote was upgraded to the senior list. I'm a bit surprised they upgraded anyone at this time, but I thought they would upgrade Newman before Foote. I think Jordan has played very well this year, particularly in the past month, but he's played almost exclusively in the midfield where we already have a lot of coverage. Maybe he will be the travelling emergency this week. He could conceivably fill that outside running midfielder played by Lloyd, or perhaps the spot vacated by Cunningham. Maybe Towers will get the chop for not covering Johannisen in that last play of the game. I'm not sure if it was his man.
Selection will be interesting this week.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 06:21 AM.
Comment