MRP - Parker and Nankervis

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neilfws
    Senior Player
    • Aug 2009
    • 1826

    #16
    All clear I think; the charges in this tweet + 2 more for Tunbridge from WC.

    AFL MRP & Tribunal on Twitter: "Eleven charges from round 21.

    L Plowman, S Docherty, R Mathieson, E Hipwood, B Keays, L Hodge, M Firrito, B Harvey all fined."

    Comment

    • Meg
      Go Swannies!
      Site Admin
      • Aug 2011
      • 4828

      #17
      Full words from MRP statement. Good, that's what it looked like to me at the time but I was beginning to doubt this would be the outcome.

      "Contact between the Sydney Swans? Toby Nankervis and St Kilda?s Sam Fisher from the third quarter of Saturday?s match was assessed. The ball was loose with Nankervis and Fisher running towards the contest from opposite directions. Fisher arrived at the ball momentarily before Nankervis and slapped the ball forward, past his opponent. Nankervis, who was committed to the contest, braced for contact with his arms crossed in front of him. High contact was made to the St Kilda player. It was the view of the panel that Nankervis? action was not a bumping motion and his actions were not reportable. No further action was taken."

      Comment

      • Meg
        Go Swannies!
        Site Admin
        • Aug 2011
        • 4828

        #18
        The MRP saved the AFL website some embarrassment as the passage of play in which the Nankervis collision occurred is listed at No. 2 on the "round 21's best moments" video! (The final seconds Nic Nat goal to win the match against GWS was (unsurprisingly) No. 1.)

        Comment

        • Meg
          Go Swannies!
          Site Admin
          • Aug 2011
          • 4828

          #19
          Parker fend-off is not mentioned in MRP statement.

          Comment

          • Meg
            Go Swannies!
            Site Admin
            • Aug 2011
            • 4828

            #20
            Originally posted by stevoswan
            Good. Sniper.....always has been, although it's a pity Mitchell got up.....
            Harvey fined - careless conduct, low impact to head.

            Comment

            • vleung1208
              On the Rookie List
              • Aug 2015
              • 23

              #21
              Brilliant. All clear!

              Comment

              • stevoswan
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2014
                • 8559

                #22
                Originally posted by erica
                From Patrick Keane ?@AFL on Twitter
                Toby Nankervis cleared contact SFisher. Panel said Nankervis braced for contact. Action was not a bumping motion and not reportable.
                That was my initial view of it when it happened, and replays confirmed that in my mind. He couldn't really avoid contact, but I must admit, it was a very effective 'bracing'! Reminded me of Mummy and I thought "mmmmmm, I like it!"

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8559

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Meg
                  Harvey fined - careless conduct, low impact to head.
                  Bummer! It's interesting, 'fine' worthy offences now include gut punches, jumper punches to the face (unless you're Tom Hawkins) and round arms to the head. Wow.....and they want to stamp out on field violence?! I'm glad they took a 'common sense' approach to Nanka's hit though.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16773

                    #24
                    My initial reaction, live, was that it was more of a collision between two big men, but the more you watch these things, the more you start to see them other ways. While I think that the MRP adjudication of Toby's actions is perfectly reasonable, I suspect there have been similar instances in past seasons (or possibly even this season) where such an action is deemed to constitute a bump and the player has been held accountable.

                    Comment

                    • Rod_
                      Senior Player
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 1179

                      #25
                      Barry Hall would have been suspended with a collision like Toby's .. Just saying! Pleased Toby is available for an interesting selection of talls this week

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8559

                        #26
                        Originally posted by liz
                        My initial reaction, live, was that it was more of a collision between two big men, but the more you watch these things, the more you start to see them other ways. While I think that the MRP adjudication of Toby's actions is perfectly reasonable, I suspect there have been similar instances in past seasons (or possibly even this season) where such an action is deemed to constitute a bump and the player has been held accountable.
                        Agree, the MRP has seemed to be heading in the direction of 'damage done' and not on the merits of the circumstances, and I was a bit worried when it was obvious Fischer was hurt, and the jaw was involved. Thankfully this time they looked sensibly at the circumstances......should be more of it!

                        Comment

                        • dejavoodoo44
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 8637

                          #27
                          Originally posted by stevoswan
                          Bummer! It's interesting, 'fine' worthy offences now include gut punches, jumper punches to the face (unless you're Tom Hawkins) and round arms to the head. Wow.....and they want to stamp out on field violence?! I'm glad they took a 'common sense' approach to Nanka's hit though.
                          Then again, I'm not sure if hitting Sam Mitchell should incur any punishment?

                          Comment

                          • stevoswan
                            Veterans List
                            • Sep 2014
                            • 8559

                            #28
                            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                            Then again, I'm not sure if hitting Sam Mitchell should incur any punishment?

                            Comment

                            • Hotpotato
                              Senior Player
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 2271

                              #29
                              Why are The Swans enjoying such a charmed existence at the moment .
                              It's unfamiliar territory .

                              Comment

                              • Meg
                                Go Swannies!
                                Site Admin
                                • Aug 2011
                                • 4828

                                #30
                                In principle the MRP no-charge decision on Nankervis is similar to that made by the then MRP in 2014 on Hannebery for his head-high collision with Hurley. In both cases the MRP is in effect saying the Swans player had no other option in the circumstances. Mind you, there was a bit of an uproar over the Hannebery decision so I expect the Nankervis decision won't be popular with some either!

                                Comment

                                Working...