Players names on jumpers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YvonneH
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2011
    • 1141

    Players names on jumpers

    In season 2014 the AFL deemed fit to have the players names on the back of their jumpers.
    What is your take on this? Could have been a problem for some, like LRT, and just recently the new Sam Powell-Pepper.
    If I remember correctly it was only for the one season.
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16763

    #2
    I think they did it just for one match.

    Comment

    • barry
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 8499

      #3
      I hope they dropped it for sensible reasons (ie players too far away for crowd/tv to read) rather than a BS "tradition" reason.

      Comment

      • swansrob
        Senior Player
        • May 2009
        • 1265

        #4
        Originally posted by liz
        I think they did it just for one match.
        Yep, it was just one game. I'm pretty sure LRT was recalled for that game simply because his was the only name the league saw fit to abbreviate and instead of his surname, he simply had LRT on the back of his gurnesey

        Comment

        • The Big Cat
          On the veteran's list
          • Apr 2006
          • 2355

          #5
          Originally posted by barry
          I hope they dropped it for sensible reasons (ie players too far away for crowd/tv to read) rather than a BS "tradition" reason.
          No need to have the American BS names on the jumpers. Numbers are sufficient, surely. A decent supporter would know each player without even a number.
          Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

          Comment

          • royboy42
            Senior Player
            • Apr 2006
            • 2077

            #6
            Why is it BS to have names on jumpers? Seems a reasonable thing to me. Clubs may prefer to have the space used to produce revenue, but that's the only possible argument against the suggestion.
            And American BS?? Ever looked at 50 and 20 over cricket, internationally btw, and not an American team in sight.
            As far as tradition is concerned..home teams used to wear black shorts and away teams white..only two reserves and once used they stayed on etc etc ...every game used to be sat arvo...no night games..one captain per team...etc etc...

            Comment

            • barry
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 8499

              #7
              Soccer players have names on their backs too. A most un-american sport.

              The traditionalists in AFL give me the @@@@s. Move on, you are holding the game back.

              Comment

              • aardvark
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2010
                • 5685

                #8
                Originally posted by royboy42
                As far as tradition is concerned..home teams used to wear black shorts and away teams white..only two reserves and once used they stayed on etc etc ...every game used to be sat arvo...no night games..one captain per team...etc etc...
                and Sydney was South Melbourne.

                Comment

                • CureTheSane
                  Carpe Noctem
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 5032

                  #9
                  I like the idea of names on the jumpers.

                  Helps new fans watching the game to know who is who (on TV at least - which is all the AFL really cares about these days anyway)
                  Also allows them to understand who commentators are talking about etc.
                  Just because America does it doesn't make it a bad idea.

                  Also, I don't see why it's an issue anyway. Are we really too traditionally precious not to allow a few letters on the back of a jumper?
                  The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                  Comment

                  • DaveyCaper
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 47

                    #10
                    As somewhat of an "outsider", I think it is a no-brainer.

                    The pluses are that if you have someone new to the game, it may help them identify with the players more because they would better know who each guy is. As well, jumpers with names on the back could be a great source of revenue for AFL teams as you can charge more than a jumper with no name. I really do not see a downside with names.

                    Comment

                    • tasswan
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 334

                      #11
                      At least the commentators might then get the player's names correct

                      Comment

                      • 56-14
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Dec 2015
                        • 260

                        #12
                        Originally posted by The Big Cat
                        No need to have the American BS names on the jumpers. Numbers are sufficient, surely. A decent supporter would know each player without even a number.
                        Fully agree.
                        Would laugh if I saw - 23 - Franklin.
                        Newbies might ask "what number is Buddy?"

                        Comment

                        • neilfws
                          Senior Player
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 1822

                          #13
                          Originally posted by barry
                          I hope they dropped it for sensible reasons (ie players too far away for crowd/tv to read) rather than a BS "tradition" reason.
                          Indeed those were the reasons: No names on jumpers, just numbers, says AFL - AFL.com.au

                          I was at the SCG for the round 5 2014 game and my recollection is that names were generally not easy to read. I don't much care one way or the other but if it adds little or nothing, why bother.

                          Comment

                          • barry
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 8499

                            #14
                            Seems lack of sleeves is the major blocker for names on jumpers.

                            It it time to introduce the sleeve, or is the tank-top design steeped in tradition and another sacred cow not to be slaughtered ?

                            BTW, when did the tank-top first become common place ?
                            Answer seems to be widespread adoption in 1960's. Sleeveless designs came and went depending on club for many years before that.

                            Comment

                            • YvonneH
                              Senior Player
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 1141

                              #15
                              I think the sleeveless jumper makes it easier to mark overhead.

                              Comment

                              Working...