JLT Round 2 v GWS Giants @BISP 7.40 pm Friday 3 March

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Meg
    Club Captain
    Site Admin
    • Aug 2011
    • 4828

    #91
    Originally posted by Sandrevan
    I recall he got 2 weeks for a sling tackle on Gary Ablett. I don't recall much else - did I miss something?
    That was 2010. Then in 2011 he got a two-match ban for another heavy sling tackle that concussed Carlton midfielder David Ellard.

    Comment

    • jren
      On the Rookie List
      • Dec 2007
      • 16

      #92
      Whether we like it or not , intimidation is part of the game . Refer to 2012 GF when Hawthorn pulverized us in the early stages.Every team needs some players with mongrel , because skill alone will not always get the job done .

      Comment

      • Meg
        Club Captain
        Site Admin
        • Aug 2011
        • 4828

        #93
        From today's MRP statement:

        'Contact between the Sydney Swans? Lance Franklin and the GWS Giants? Tim Taranto from the second quarter of Friday?s match was assessed. The ball was kicked forward by GWS? Heath Shaw, and then punched further down the ground in the air. Taranto was approaching the loose ball, with Franklin coming to the contest from his right and Shane Mumford approaching from down the ground. Mumford seeks to shepherd Franklin away from his teammate and Franklin then goes on to make contact with Taranto. It was the view of the panel that contact between Franklin and Taranto was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Franklin that could not be reasonably foreseen. No further action was taken.'

        Comment

        • Ludwig
          Veterans List
          • Apr 2007
          • 9359

          #94
          Originally posted by jren
          Whether we like it or not , intimidation is part of the game . Refer to 2012 GF when Hawthorn pulverized us in the early stages.Every team needs some players with mongrel , because skill alone will not always get the job done .
          Couldn't agree more. We may have lost Mummy, but thankfully we locked up Harry Cunningham until 2019.

          Comment

          • 56-14
            Warming the Bench
            • Dec 2015
            • 260

            #95
            Originally posted by Meg
            From today's MRP statement:

            'Contact between the Sydney Swans? Lance Franklin and the GWS Giants? Tim Taranto from the second quarter of Friday?s match was assessed. The ball was kicked forward by GWS? Heath Shaw, and then punched further down the ground in the air. Taranto was approaching the loose ball, with Franklin coming to the contest from his right and Shane Mumford approaching from down the ground. Mumford seeks to shepherd Franklin away from his teammate and Franklin then goes on to make contact with Taranto. It was the view of the panel that contact between Franklin and Taranto was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Franklin that could not be reasonably foreseen. No further action was taken.'
            Thanks Meg - been on tender hooks waiting the outcome.

            Didn't think Buddy would get a suspension - but you never know these days.

            Note that the MRP stated that the incident with Mummy shepherding wasn't a marking contest - the ball had been punched.

            Comment

            • Industrial Fan
              Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
              • Aug 2006
              • 3320

              #96
              Originally posted by jren
              Whether we like it or not , intimidation is part of the game . Refer to 2012 GF when Hawthorn pulverized us in the early stages.Every team needs some players with mongrel , because skill alone will not always get the job done .
              Every time I see Luke Hodge I see BLT eating him alive just in front of goal in the 2012 gf.

              We dished a bit out in that gf. Goodes in the 4th when he could only run in a straight line.

              Mummy is who he was when he played for us. Seems hypocritical to question his methods now.
              He ate more cheese, than time allowed

              Comment

              • jren
                On the Rookie List
                • Dec 2007
                • 16

                #97
                Oops, sorry, my mistake i meant to refer to the 2014 GF loss when the Hawks went the knuckle early leaving some players such as Hanners and Jetts bruised and battered.

                Comment

                • Untamed Snark
                  Senior Player
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 1375

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Sandrevan
                  Was Mummy a 'dirty' player when he played for us?

                  I recall he got 2 weeks for a sling tackle on Gary Ablett. I don't recall much else - did I miss something?
                  He's always been aggressive but it really seems to have taken off in the past few years.
                  Chillin' with the strange Quarks

                  Comment

                  • crackedactor
                    Regular in the Side
                    • May 2012
                    • 919

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Industrial Fan
                    Every time I see Luke Hodge I see BLT eating him alive just in front of goal in the 2012 gf.

                    We dished a bit out in that gf. Goodes in the 4th when he could only run in a straight line.

                    Mummy is who he was when he played for us. Seems hypocritical to question his methods now.
                    Yes a little bit of mongrel probably got us over the line in 2012, so having a go at him now is hypocritical. Unfortunately we don't have any mongrel in our current team and without that we will never win a flag. Even look at last year with the Bulldogs and their sliding tackles, Its got to hurt your legs to have someone take your legs out whilst running for the ball. Of course if we do it in a match it will be a free kick plus a 50 mtr penalty against us, but that's the AFL policy rulings.

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      Originally posted by crackedactor
                      Yes a little bit of mongrel probably got us over the line in 2012, so having a go at him now is hypocritical. Unfortunately we don't have any mongrel in our current team and without that we will never win a flag. Even look at last year with the Bulldogs and their sliding tackles, Its got to hurt your legs to have someone take your legs out whilst running for the ball. Of course if we do it in a match it will be a free kick plus a 50 mtr penalty against us, but that's the AFL policy rulings.
                      Jones? Laidler? Franklin (occasionally)?
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • bloodspirit
                        Clubman
                        • Apr 2015
                        • 4448

                        Our players aim to be 'hard' and disciplined rather than to have 'mongrel'. And I think they succeed in that. Hard, to me, seems pretty much mongrel with added discipline and less spite and in-your-face attitude. Players like Heeney, Parker, Hanners, Mills, Joey and others are all hard even if you wouldn't say they have 'mongrel'.

                        I agree Jones probably has the most mongrel out of senior players but he's a relative lightweight so probably not qualified to be an 'enforcer' like Mummy. Nank had mongrel but he's gone now and deploying it for Wretchmond. Titch may not have had 'mongrel' exactly but we lost some hardness when he walked out too. Sinclair might have some mongrel in him but if we're lucky we won't see it because he won't be playing in the senior side. Buddy has a brilliant balance. I wouldn't call him an enforcer or even a mongrel but he does throw his weight around at opportune times and I really like that about him. It is a form or leadership and he has stood up in that way at times when the team has really needed it. I would say that possibly Papley has a bit of mongrel about him with his rabid attack on the ball and the man. Unfortunately he is a bit of a lightweight too - and nor is he playing for the time being. Ditto Leonardis.
                        All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16818

                          I think Buddy would love to be more of an enforcer - to throw his considerable weight around a bit more. But I reckon he's also under instruction from the coaches to keep it under control. His height and weight make it difficult for him to not to make high and fierce contact with an opponent if he chooses to bump (or even just shepherd). Combined with his high profile and the media obsession with him transgressing, that's a recipe for weeks on the sideline if not carefully controlled. Longmire doesn't want his best asset sitting out, watching games.

                          Comment

                          • bloodspirit
                            Clubman
                            • Apr 2015
                            • 4448

                            liz, there's just about nothing I can say that you don't say better.

                            I especially liked your last post on the Round 1 thread too about having players out and watching the fringe players get their chance. Totally agree with you as I almost always do.
                            All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                            Comment

                            • Mug Punter
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 3325

                              I know it may not have been possible to work things this way but I seriously think that we would have been better off keeping Nanka and trading Callum off somewhere, like maybe back home.

                              Having said that, he would still have been third string and it looks like he is number 2 at least at the Tigers so he may well have left anyway. I am more than happy with Tippo and Naismith as our two best rucks. And I really like the look of young Darcy Cameron, think with a couple of seasons under the Ruck Whisperer he could well become a very good ruckman once Tippett leaves at the end of 2018. Just love the pipeline we have now re our list, rucks are just not an issue now, nor is the defence (AJ Melican Newman and young Jack all potentially pushing). We have young Nick Blakey in 2018 as a KPF so as far I can tell we just start banking midfielders for at least two drafts

                              Comment

                              • Doctor J.
                                Senior Player
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 1310

                                Originally posted by bloodspirit
                                liz, there's just about nothing I can say that you don't say better.

                                I especially liked your last post on the Round 1 thread too about having players out and watching the fringe players get their chance. Totally agree with you as I almost always do.
                                Liz, relative or nom de plume?

                                Comment

                                Working...