Changes for Round 2 v Western Bulldogs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Cat
    On the veteran's list
    • Apr 2006
    • 2347

    Just looked at the video on the Swans website where players describe their greatest fear. Virtually all snakes, spiders and sharks except Dean Towers. His greatest fear is "being dropped by Horse". Perhaps helps to explain his tentativeness and indecision!
    Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

    Comment

    • Markwebbos
      Veterans List
      • Jul 2016
      • 7186

      Originally posted by The Big Cat
      Just looked at the video on the Swans website where players describe their greatest fear. Virtually all snakes, spiders and sharks except Dean Towers. His greatest fear is "being dropped by Horse". Perhaps helps to explain his tentativeness and indecision!
      You'd think he play better than that in that case. I think his greatest fear is putting his head over the ball

      Comment

      • Nico
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 11328

        Originally posted by crackedactor
        It surprising that with Talia's experience, that he was not chosen. Must be still in the bad books. Anyhow it may be like us in the first game in 2006. We got slammed by Port Adelaide in the first game and the rumour when around that players shared a drink or two with some ex players the night before. Hopefully the Bulldogs will do the same.
        Could be that Talia's pre season work and game performances have not been up to scratch, or maybe they have worked out that he is no good.
        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

        Comment

        • Nico
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 11328

          Originally posted by Markwebbos
          You'd think he play better than that in that case. I think his greatest fear is putting his head over the ball
          You can add HC to that list. In Horse's words...hard fierce footy this week....Harry. I'd like to see that.
          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

          Comment

          • wolftone57
            Veterans List
            • Aug 2008
            • 5835

            Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
            I agree at a surface level it looks like we could be in for a bath with those matchups in the backline

            But I suspect horse is forcing our players into a corner on this one.......he is issuing a challenge to see where we are at re the core of being a blood

            He is forcing our guys to win the contests, and win the tackles .......if we do we have the mobility to breakaway and leave their talls in our wake with our smaller backline

            But the opportunity cost is if we fail to win the ball and they get to kick to open targets one on one we are stuffed

            It's quite clever in a way...no one can hide from the contests otherwise we are gooone !!!

            Plan B though is I am sure we will be playing massive players around the ball ie the swans medium defenders will be pushing up and creating massive congestion and or flooding back in numbers..... when u think about it what other option do we have?

            With the amount of players we have out for this game we can't take them on one on one.......we have to jam the ball at either end of the ground ie where we can play high pressure contested ball with millions of bodies around the ball in a smaller space

            I think horse has chosen the right bodies to execute this strategy...still would have preferred AA in there though

            And paps and heeney and Rampe and Robbo and macca and Rohan and and and and and.......


            AG I'm more worried that the Dogs will just kick the high ball in and their talls will just clean up on smaller opponents. I can remember a match where we had a huge advantage in height and we used it to kill them off. I can't see us winning with such a huge disadvantage in height in the back half. I have followed Aussie Rules since I was a 4 yo and now I am 60. I have never seen a back half giving away this much height. Sure Leo & Craig Bolton gave away a bit but not generally 10-20cm. Laidler will be giving away 16cm on the resting ruck if he gets him. Mills is in an even worse position being 2cm shorter than Laids (even though 2cm is only about 8/10ths of an inch) but it does matter slightly when you take into account reach (arms are slightly longer).

            Quite frankly I'm less worried about the young players coming in than I am about the lack of height and the fact our mids are having trouble winning the clearances and stoppages. If we lose the clearances and stoppages against the Dogs like we did against Port we will get murdered. Our forward line didn't work badly against Port it was the lack of service and crap delivery that killed off any chance. Add to that the fact that we took the ball around the same side of the ground and were so predictable that Port just set up for it and congested the flank and pocket we didn't try anything else. The mids tactics on forward entry were crap. This is a coaching problem not a player problem. The players only do as they are instructed.

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              Originally posted by Nico
              You can add HC to that list. In Horse's words...hard fierce footy this week....Harry. I'd like to see that.
              Nah, don't buy this. I saw Harry stick his head over the ball as recently as last week - I was watching deliberately. I know he hasn't done it at times but I hope to see some more of this.
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • bloodspirit
                Clubman
                • Apr 2015
                • 4448

                Originally posted by Vonsteinman
                Or maybe having (very closely) watched him play, train, recover, develop, prepare and build fitness over a number of years, there is a decision that he is not yet ready to be thrown in for a full hit out of senior AFL. So they've decided to manage his game time again in the twos and will select him when they are confident that he's ready?

                Either that or one of the more plausible theories that Horse doesn't know what he's doing or is deliberately selecting an inferior side against the team that beat them in the GF....
                Like. ????
                All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                Comment

                • aardvark
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5685

                  Originally posted by Vonsteinman
                  Or maybe having (very closely) watched him play, train, recover, develop, prepare and build fitness over a number of years, there is a decision that he is not yet ready to be thrown in for a full hit out of senior AFL. So they've decided to manage his game time again in the twos and will select him when they are confident that he's ready?
                  Completely ruined an excellent conspiracy theory there Vonn.

                  Comment

                  Working...