Changes for Rnd 18 V St Kilda

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aardvark
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2010
    • 5685

    Changes for Rnd 18 V St Kilda

    Out Reid, Robbo
    In. Dawson, Aliir
  • CureTheSane
    Carpe Noctem
    • Jan 2003
    • 5032

    #2
    Out: Reid, Robbo, Smith
    In: Sinclair, Cunningham, Allir
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

    Comment

    • barry
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 8499

      #3
      The only changes will be those that are forced.
      So, maybe
      Out: Reid
      In: Sinclair?

      Comment

      • iigrover
        Warming the Bench
        • Sep 2005
        • 245

        #4
        IN: Pride
        OUT: Hate

        Comment

        • Mug Punter
          On the Rookie List
          • Nov 2009
          • 3325

          #5
          Assuming Reid is out I'd just bring in Dawson and play Gary at FF.

          If Gary is out as well then we have some issues, I guess you bring in Sinkers. If this is the case then it would represent the first time I'd be wishing we had Xav on the list....

          With a bit of luck it's just Sammy and he's back before the finals

          No injuries and it's Dawson in for Robbo

          Comment

          • 707
            Veterans List
            • Aug 2009
            • 6204

            #6
            Dawson IN, must be given a run after a string of outstanding NEAFL games. Brings a difference to the forward line and kicks long and straight!

            Comment

            • Blood Fever
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 4043

              #7
              Originally posted by barry
              The only changes will be those that are forced.
              So, maybe
              Out: Reid
              In: Sinclair?

              In: Allir

              Out: Reid(inj)

              Dawson unlucky but need an extra tall for balance. It would have been Tippett but body let him down again. If not Allir, would be Sinclair but Allir is much better when the ball hits the deck.

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16755

                #8
                Not sure why we need an extra tall in, not against the Saints. If the coaches weren't keen to do so against the giant Giants (before Cameron's withdrawal) I don't see that they will against the Saints. They have Bruce and Riewoldt, and presumably they'll stick with Battle next week. A bit like Richmond (though not quite as pronounced), the Saints' forward line relies a fair bit on its fleet of quick and short/medium players - the likes of Lonie, Billings, Gresham, Long and Sinclair.

                Comment

                • AB Swannie
                  Senior Player
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 1579

                  #9
                  Out: Reid (inj), Robinson
                  In: Dawson, Hayward

                  Comment

                  • Club 80
                    Suspended by the MRP
                    • Apr 2017
                    • 149

                    #10
                    Outs - Reid, Hannas, Robinson

                    Ins - Aliir, Dawson, Heywood

                    Reid looked very hampered and you don't take chances with the Reid boys and soft tissue injuries. Bring in Aliir to give a contest up forward and help in the ruck.

                    It was mentioned in another thread that Hannas potentially had OP. If that's the case then it's time for some time off and he can be back to impact the finals.

                    I'm looking for an excuse to get Dawson into the seniors and Robinson is that excuse. Dawson is a similar size to Robinson but I think he would offer the team more attacking capability.

                    Comment

                    • Billericay
                      Regular in the Side
                      • May 2013
                      • 712

                      #11
                      I'm not sure why everyone is calling for Robinson's head? Didn't he play on Wilson who only had it 8 times?

                      If Reid is unable to play next week then I can see 3 candidates to replace him as a forward: Sinclair, Hayward, Dawson. Hayward's got more runs on the board but not in that role. Sinclair can't really mark the ball, so perhaps it's time to give Dawson a go. Can he play that role. Could Towers, given he's been rucking?

                      Comment

                      • Jeynez
                        Warming the Bench
                        • May 2013
                        • 223

                        #12
                        Surely Sinclair in for Reid for team balance. Allows Rohan to take the third best tall defender (which we can hopefully exploit), and will allow Buddy to get more 1v1 situations

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16755

                          #13
                          I'd be very surprised to see Hayward back next week. He landed very heavily taking a mark just before the quarter time siren in the NEAFL game. When he stood up, he was hobbling so badly I didn't think he was going to be able to take his kick. He did, and remarkably converted it with aplomb (from nearly 50m, on an angle). But as Ugg has reported, he did very little in the second quarter and sat out the second half.

                          The coaches aren't going to bring such a young, inexperienced player into the side until they are sure he's 100% right to play. You might take a chance with a key, senior experienced player who might not be fully fit, but not with an 18yo.

                          Comment

                          • AB Swannie
                            Senior Player
                            • Mar 2017
                            • 1579

                            #14
                            Originally posted by liz
                            I'd be very surprised to see Hayward back next week. He landed very heavily taking a mark just before the quarter time siren in the NEAFL game. When he stood up, he was hobbling so badly I didn't think he was going to be able to take his kick. He did, and remarkably converted it with aplomb (from nearly 50m, on an angle). But as Ugg has reported, he did very little in the second quarter and sat out the second half.

                            The coaches aren't going to bring such a young, inexperienced player into the side until they are sure he's 100% right to play. You might take a chance with a key, senior experienced player who might not be fully fit, but not with an 18yo.
                            Thanks for the info Liz. I didn't realise this was the reason he sat out the second half. Aliir may be a big chance then.

                            Comment

                            • ugg
                              Can you feel it?
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 15967

                              #15
                              I doubt that Aliir will come in as a forward. Besides being able to kick goals one thing you do have to do as a forward at AFLlevel is stick to the structures that have been set in place by the coaches. I don't think Aliir has played enough as a forward for the Swans for him to be able to slot in

                              When XR was brought in last year, co incidentally for Round 18 last year, he had spent a good 6-7 games playing as a permanent forward (and kicking lots of goals). Aliir has only spent parts of games as a forward.
                              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                              Reserves WIKI -
                              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                              Comment

                              Working...