Season Review: #4 Hanners

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RogueSwan
    McVeigh for Brownlow
    • Apr 2003
    • 4602

    Season Review: #4 Hanners

    A strong finish to the season from the hardened midfielder helped lead the Swans into another finals campaign.


    Hanners didn't seem to stand out this year as much as previous seasons, whether that be a different role or something else??
    His form did, like a lot of the team, seemed to improve as the team started winning, or should that be the other way round.
    As I have l mentioned elsewhere, I would like to see him outside the contest next season and using his "gut" running to his advantage.
    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017
  • sprite
    Regular in the Side
    • Jan 2003
    • 813

    #2
    I don't think he was fully fit this year.

    He kept going but didn't seem to have the impact.

    With the introduction of Papley, Heeney, Hewitt and others into the middle, his role changed a bit which probably affected his output as well.
    sprite

    Comment

    • ASSASSIN
      Pushing for Selection
      • Sep 2013
      • 85

      #3
      Dan Hannebery is slow, slow, slow. Not saying he isn't a good player over all, but when the top clubs all focus on foot speed (GWS-Tigers-Crows and last year W-bulldogs) many clubs are falling behind once the heat is on in the finals.

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        #4
        Hanners teased us in the early years by looking like he could be a dangerfeld/Martin/Kelly elite player, but never seems to have got there.

        8/10

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16786

          #5
          Originally posted by barry
          Hanners teased us in the early years by looking like he could be a dangerfeld/Martin/Kelly elite player, but never seems to have got there.

          8/10
          He's never had the explosiveness of a Dangerfield or Martin, or the classy footskills of a Kelly (I assume you're taking about Josh Kelly here, not PK. If you're talking about PK, his explosive pace was one of his best assets).

          Martin's just had one of the best seasons on record but it's taken him some time reaching his potential. At the start of this year he'd only made the AA team once (and that was in 2016 when he got lots of the ball but was far less damaging than in 2017) compared to Hannebery's thrice. Even Dangerfield's now tally of five AAs hardly blows Hanners out of the water, especially given he's a year older.

          I'm not suggesting that Hanners is capable of lifting his game to the level that Danger has (2016-17) or Martin (2017) given the previously noted lack of explosiveness (and he's a fair bit smaller than either of them too) but he's carved out a consistent and fairly well decorated career in his own right and I think most AFL players would be proud to achieve his level of performance.

          It's also worth pointing out that Martin was a pick 3 back in his day (and many would have taken him at pick 1) and Dangerfield was also a top 10 pick. I suggest their size and pace, both of which have contributed to them achieving the standards they now have, were significant reasons why they were drafted so high and Hanners was drafted at pick 30.

          Comment

          • Blood Fever
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 4051

            #6
            Originally posted by liz
            He's never had the explosiveness of a Dangerfield or Martin, or the classy footskills of a Kelly (I assume you're taking about Josh Kelly here, not PK. If you're talking about PK, his explosive pace was one of his best assets).

            Martin's just had one of the best seasons on record but it's taken him some time reaching his potential. At the start of this year he'd only made the AA team once (and that was in 2016 when he got lots of the ball but was far less damaging than in 2017) compared to Hannebery's thrice. Even Dangerfield's now tally of five AAs hardly blows Hanners out of the water, especially given he's a year older.

            I'm not suggesting that Hanners is capable of lifting his game to the level that Danger has (2016-17) or Martin (2017) given the previously noted lack of explosiveness (and he's a fair bit smaller than either of them too) but he's carved out a consistent and fairly well decorated career in his own right and I think most AFL players would be proud to achieve his level of performance.

            It's also worth pointing out that Martin was a pick 3 back in his day (and many would have taken him at pick 1) and Dangerfield was also a top 10 pick. I suggest their size and pace, both of which have contributed to them achieving the standards they now have, were significant reasons why they were drafted so high and Hanners was drafted at pick 30.
            Had a great career with us. Outstanding player who does not have the power or size of Martin or Dangerfield. Courageous to a fault, especially for his weight. Premiership player who could easily have a Norm Smith medal to his name.

            Comment

            • MattW
              Veterans List
              • May 2011
              • 4231

              #7
              Our best in the abject denouement and spoke with typical honesty after the game. Big game player, strong mind. Hope he's fully fit next year.

              Comment

              • 111431
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2010
                • 699

                #8
                Originally posted by MattW
                Our best in the abject denouement and spoke with typical honesty after the game. Big game player, strong mind. Hope he's fully fit next year.
                I think he was playing injured for most of the yr - he had little acceleration and his left foot kicking lacked any great penetration

                Comment

                • RogueSwan
                  McVeigh for Brownlow
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 4602

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ASSASSIN
                  Dan Hannebery is slow, slow, slow. Not saying he isn't a good player over all, but when the top clubs all focus on foot speed (GWS-Tigers-Crows and last year W-bulldogs) many clubs are falling behind once the heat is on in the finals.
                  He may not be fast (although he is by hand and foot) but his foot speed is consistent over a whole game. He seems to be able to just run and run.
                  "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                  Comment

                  • dimelb
                    pr. dim-melb; m not f
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 6889

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 111431
                    I think he was playing injured for most of the yr - he had little acceleration and his left foot kicking lacked any great penetration
                    I thought the same. Hope that means an even better year in 2018.
                    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                    Comment

                    • Swansongster
                      Senior Player
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 1264

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Blood Fever
                      Had a great career with us. Outstanding player who does not have the power or size of Martin or Dangerfield. Courageous to a fault, especially for his weight. Premiership player who could easily have a Norm Smith medal to his name.
                      He was BOG on GF day 2012 (IMHO). Robbed.

                      Comment

                      • RogueSwan
                        McVeigh for Brownlow
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 4602

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Swansongster
                        He was BOG on GF day 2012 (IMHO). Robbed.
                        And if he didn't get it AJ should have.
                        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                        Comment

                        • Industrial Fan
                          Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 3318

                          #13
                          On the bright side, at least it didn't go to Judd in 2012.

                          Big game player that seemed to be coming good towards the end of the season. No doubt he was injured.

                          I think we have a lot to look forward to in 2018. Hanners, Parker and Kennedy well down on their 2016 output more or less across the board and none of that trio are over the hill.
                          He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                          Comment

                          • dimelb
                            pr. dim-melb; m not f
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 6889

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RogueSwan
                            And if he didn't get it AJ should have.
                            Mrs d and I watched the 2012 GF last night and were even more impressed with Alex's game. We are now looking forward to a solid pre-season for him and seeing what emerges.
                            He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                            Comment

                            Working...