Nic Nat was fantastic, and they smashed us in hit outs, but lost in clearances. So that either means that a) with a lesser ruckman we would have won by more; or b) Nic Nat wasnt actually that effective. I think it is probably a blend of the two.
Hewett was very clean overhead in the contest, but his skills by foot were dreadful. It could have been tired legs, but it was significantly worse than others on the park.
Heeney is hard done by to put in a game of that quality, and not be BoG. It took a guy to kick 8 and win it off his own boot to beat him. Definitely his most impactful game.
Hewett was very clean overhead in the contest, but his skills by foot were dreadful. It could have been tired legs, but it was significantly worse than others on the park.
Heeney is hard done by to put in a game of that quality, and not be BoG. It took a guy to kick 8 and win it off his own boot to beat him. Definitely his most impactful game.

Comment