It's pretty obvious that some players are held to different standards than others. I can understand this in the context of a club B&F, but I reckon the Coaches' Association votes should be awarded on absolute, not relative, merit.
I thought Hayward had a good game, as did Melican. But can anyone really claim that they had more impact on the outcome than Buddy?
I thought Hayward had a good game, as did Melican. But can anyone really claim that they had more impact on the outcome than Buddy?


Comment