#AFL Round 6 Weekly Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stevoswan
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2014
    • 8576

    #16
    I didn't expect Richmond to be traveling so well in their premiership defense but I think we are witnessing a mid to high level talent team that are gelling beautifully as their belief in themselves rises......a dangerous combination that reminds me of certain Swans teams of recent past. They will be prone to off days, as their loss to Adelaide suggests but they are becoming a formidable force.....albeit with a fairly soft fixture so far, softer than ours has been.

    Comment

    • dejavoodoo44
      Veterans List
      • Apr 2015
      • 8738

      #17
      Something from an AFL.com article on the Max Gawn/spectator incident:
      " "The patron in question from today's incident actually removed himself from the seating bowl," an Etihad Stadium spokesperson told AFL.com.au."
      WTF is a seating bowl!?? Are individual seats now seating bowls? Or instead of bays, do we now have seating bowls? Or is seating bowl now the innovative, proactive term for stadium. As in, "Yes, Derek, our administration has been instrumental in upgrading the MCG to a magnificent, state of the art, seating bowl; offering the consumer an unsurpassed match day experience."
      Grrrr! Language like that should be flushed down the seating bowl, located adjacent to the free-flowing, aqueous grime removal facility.

      Comment

      • Swansongster
        Senior Player
        • Sep 2008
        • 1264

        #18
        Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
        Something from an AFL.com article on the Max Gawn/spectator incident:
        " "The patron in question from today's incident actually removed himself from the seating bowl," an Etihad Stadium spokesperson told AFL.com.au."
        WTF is a seating bowl!?? Are individual seats now seating bowls? Or instead of bays, do we now have seating bowls? Or is seating bowl now the innovative, proactive term for stadium. As in, "Yes, Derek, our administration has been instrumental in upgrading the MCG to a magnificent, state of the art, seating bowl; offering the consumer an unsurpassed match day experience."
        Grrrr! Language like that should be flushed down the seating bowl, located adjacent to the free-flowing, aqueous grime removal facility.
        As opposed to the "concourse", I suppose.

        Comment

        • Swansongster
          Senior Player
          • Sep 2008
          • 1264

          #19
          Originally posted by neilfws
          Does anyone else feel that skills are down in general this year? I know it's very anecdotal, based on what games I see, but I seem to be thinking "plenty of intent let down by poor execution" in a lot of games. Cobwebs are normally shaken out by now, but almost feels like they aren't.
          I concur. I took a mate - down from Sydney - to Docklands yesterday for his first ever AFL game. It was a scrappy affair that never reached any great heights. Neither of these two teams will figure late in September based on that performance. Given, they were both the tired losers from ANZAC Day games, but I can't see either Dees or Bombers getting anywhere near the pre- and early-season hype that was heaped upon them.

          There was some good transition at stages but a lot of that was due to to poor forward pressure (from both teams). Lots of intercepts from misdirected kicks, handballs to no-one and dropped easy marks. I've seen better play at Port Melbourne games.

          The 36,000 crowd never really got into the game either. Old mate enjoyed it but I think I let him down taking him to that game. I literally nearly fell asleep at one stage.

          Comment

          • dejavoodoo44
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2015
            • 8738

            #20
            Originally posted by Swansongster
            As opposed to the "concourse", I suppose.
            Dunno. We can only guess as to what they meant. Which to me, is poor use of the language.
            Another similar bug bear of mine, is the occasional commentator still using the phrase "early doors", instead of early. Again, WTF is an early door?!

            Comment

            • Bloods05
              Senior Player
              • Oct 2008
              • 1641

              #21
              Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
              Dunno. We can only guess as to what they meant. Which to me, is poor use of the language.
              Another similar bug bear of mine, is the occasional commentator still using the phrase "early doors", instead of early. Again, WTF is an early door?!
              From Wikipedia: "[It] is a British slang phrase meaning those who arrive earlier than is customary, and was often associated with pub customers who wait for or arrive soon after evening opening, around 5:30 pm. Until the law was changed in 1988, pubs in England closed in the afternoon. Most are now open all day. It is also widely heard in British football circles, and was resuscitated in comments about football. The phrase originates in the practice of British theatres from around 1870 of allowing customers who paid a little extra to enter the theatre early and choose their own seats before the rush just before the performance started."

              Though what that has to do with early in a footy game escapes me.

              Comment

              • dejavoodoo44
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2015
                • 8738

                #22
                Originally posted by Bloods05
                From Wikipedia: "[It] is a British slang phrase meaning those who arrive earlier than is customary, and was often associated with pub customers who wait for or arrive soon after evening opening, around 5:30 pm. Until the law was changed in 1988, pubs in England closed in the afternoon. Most are now open all day. It is also widely heard in British football circles, and was resuscitated in comments about football. The phrase originates in the practice of British theatres from around 1870 of allowing customers who paid a little extra to enter the theatre early and choose their own seats before the rush just before the performance started."

                Though what that has to do with early in a footy game escapes me.
                Ta, it makes even less sense now. Thankfully, the trend of using the term seems to be dying off. And it's use was always more popular in soccer, rather than AFL.
                Though it probably still leaves the question, why did a number of commentators feel the need, to use a phrase that had no relation to what they were describing?

                Comment

                • Bloods05
                  Senior Player
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 1641

                  #23
                  Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                  Ta, it makes even less sense now. Thankfully, the trend of using the term seems to be dying off. And it's use was always more popular in soccer, rather than AFL.
                  Though it probably still leaves the question, why did a number of commentators feel the need, to use a phrase that had no relation to what they were describing?
                  Maybe they think it makes them sound sophisticated or something? It's a time-honoured tradition among mediocre commentators; viz. Dermott Brereton, Dwayne Russell.

                  Comment

                  • dejavoodoo44
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 8738

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Bloods05
                    Maybe they think it makes them sound sophisticated or something? It's a time-honoured tradition among mediocre commentators; viz. Dermott Brereton, Dwayne Russell.
                    Yes, though they're probably not fooling too many people.

                    Comment

                    • stevoswan
                      Veterans List
                      • Sep 2014
                      • 8576

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Bloods05
                      Maybe they think it makes them sound sophisticated or something? It's a time-honoured tradition among mediocre commentators; viz. Dermott Brereton, Dwayne Russell.
                      Add to those, Luke Darcy.....Mr Cliche, Hamish McLachlin, Basil Zempilas......all knobs.

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8576

                        #26
                        We don't feature in the 'Mark of the Round' top three much.....this week, twice!

                        Mark Of The Year - Round 6

                        Heen's was typically gutsy, Howe of Collingwoods was typically flashy but for a classic 'hanger', Fox gets my vote......

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16795

                          #27
                          Originally posted by stevoswan
                          We don't feature in the 'Mark of the Round' top three much.....this week, twice!

                          Mark Of The Year - Round 6

                          Heen's was typically gutsy, Howe of Collingwoods was typically flashy but for a classic 'hanger', Fox gets my vote......
                          Fox's might have been the most "classic" hanger but it was probably the easiest of the three to complete. I expect Howe's will win the overall nomination this week, but it is great (and unusual) for the Swans to feature twice.

                          Comment

                          • Bill Posters
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Sep 2014
                            • 259

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Swansongster
                            I concur. I took a mate - down from Sydney - to Docklands yesterday for his first ever AFL game. It was a scrappy affair that never reached any great heights. Neither of these two teams will figure late in September based on that performance. Given, they were both the tired losers from ANZAC Day games, but I can't see either Dees or Bombers getting anywhere near the pre- and early-season hype that was heaped upon them.

                            There was some good transition at stages but a lot of that was due to to poor forward pressure (from both teams). Lots of intercepts from misdirected kicks, handballs to no-one and dropped easy marks. I've seen better play at Port Melbourne games.

                            The 36,000 crowd never really got into the game either. Old mate enjoyed it but I think I let him down taking him to that game. I literally nearly fell asleep at one stage.
                            Titus O'Reily had some great withering commentary on the state of football this year. Eg for this game:

                            "The first half was like both sides had thrown down the gauntlet to see who could destroy the hopes and dreams of their fans the most.@

                            Fittingly, both sides fumbled picking up that gauntlet for the entire first half until the Bombers emerged in the second half with it firmly in hand."

                            Reading his summaries leaves you with the feeling that about half the teams in this year's comp are total rubbish. Might be true.

                            Comment

                            • YvonneH
                              Senior Player
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 1141

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Bill Posters
                              Titus O'Reily had some great withering commentary on the state of football this year. Eg for this game:

                              "The first half was like both sides had thrown down the gauntlet to see who could destroy the hopes and dreams of their fans the most.@

                              Fittingly, both sides fumbled picking up that gauntlet for the entire first half until the Bombers emerged in the second half with it firmly in hand."

                              Reading his summaries leaves you with the feeling that about half the teams in this year's comp are total rubbish. Might be true.
                              But he is funny. Makes a change from the usual media doom and gloom.

                              Comment

                              • stevoswan
                                Veterans List
                                • Sep 2014
                                • 8576

                                #30
                                Sad news about Bomber Thompson......seems to have not handled the Essendon 'drugs' scandal fall out well at all. Charged today with drug trafficking offences. Real sad......

                                Comment

                                Working...